Is pakistan threat to the world

[prince V]

Pakistan has uranium in large quantity and with help of china they are making nuclear weapons. They sell uranium in large quantity to north korea for sake of money and indirectly supporting terrorism.
They sponsor suicide bombers and various other terror groups.

[Hazir]

I just want to add that on top selling nuclear weaponry to the highest bidder Pakistan hid Osama Bin Laden and it is generally considered to be a terrorists haven state.
Many regions in Pakistan are under no control by any law or government. It is a fundamentalist Islamic state, of course they will support and sponsor terrorism against infidels.
From what I learned government of Pakistan is influenced by radical Islamists. This country is a ticking bomb waiting to explode.

Pakistan was so amazing in the 60. and 70. what happened?

https://www.scoopwhoop.com/Images-From-Pakistans-Past/#.n8irbjm1s

[zokora]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

[Sithara007]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

[prince V]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

There are countries more dangerous than pakistan doesnt mean pakistan is not. Your words indirectly convey that you also believe pakistan is terror prone country

[prince V]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

Not at all.If a country should be said as Rogue nation for having nuclear weapons,then definitely US deserves to be called as a rogue nation.US has largest number of nuclear weapons and its a great threat to world peace,always threatening smaller countries.

Read question carefully its by sponsoring terrorism and not by having nuclear weapon  eventhough nuclear weapon is anothet factor

[bryant.coleman]

Pakistan is a major sponsor of terrorism, just like Saudi Arabia and Qatar. They terrorize the minorities (Hindus, Christians, Kalash.etc) living within Pakistan and they also export terror to the neighboring nations such as India and Afghanistan. The Taliban of Afghanistan still receive a lot of support (in terms of arms and money) from the Pakistani government.

[digaran]

I don't know if anyone knows this or not? there are a bunch of people living on high horses thinking they're superior and center of the universe, they feel entitled to owning the whole world, anyone outside their country is a burden, cancer, unneeded.
It doesn't matter who you are or where you are or what you say, it's all about them, what they want and what they feel and think is right.

Sounds familiar? yes that is exactly all the nations and countries, that's why there is chaos, so many wars and conflicts and pretty much how our world works right now, as long as we feel that way, as long as we don't see each other as equal, as long as we don't respect human lives this is what we get.

A world full of hatred, disrespect, discrimination, rule of the jungle, and we actually don't care because we're animals, love and compassion empathy are the things that makes human to be human, to be God's favorite and unique creation, take them from us and then comes the flood, why would a God want such ungrateful, despicable living things?

[xypos]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Why do you think that Iran is more dangerous than Pakistan, can you give me some reasons please? I have never thought that someone may consider Iran as a threat to other, big and developed countries.
But i have to agree, North Korea is probably more dangerous than the previously mentioned country. Indeed, Pakistan has really huge amount of uranium resources, but they are not so stupid to start a nuclear war without any reason.

I would not be so sure about North Korea, they are the threat to the peace on our planet, because they are totally not afraid of launching their nuclear rockets on some independent country.

I hope that everybody knows what is going to happen when anyone will launch nukes aimed in different country?
An apocalypse.

[bryant.coleman]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Why do you think that Iran is more dangerous than Pakistan, can you give me some reasons please? I have never thought that someone may consider Iran as a threat to other, big and developed countries.
But i have to agree, North Korea is probably more dangerous than the previously mentioned country. Indeed, Pakistan has really huge amount of uranium resources, but they are not so stupid to start a nuclear war without any reason.

I would not be so sure about North Korea, they are the threat to the peace on our planet, because they are totally not afraid of launching their nuclear rockets on some independent country.

I hope that everybody knows what is going to happen when anyone will launch nukes aimed in different country?
An apocalypse.

Even North Korea is not as dangerous as Pakistan. I will explain. North Korea is unlikley to transfer their nuclear technology (which they developed themselves) to any third party. On the other hand, Pakistanis are likely to transfer both the technology and warheads to third party groups such as the Al Qaeda and the ISIS, as well as to nations such as Saudi Arabia.

[Lieldoryn]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Why do you think that Iran is more dangerous than Pakistan, can you give me some reasons please? I have never thought that someone may consider Iran as a threat to other, big and developed countries.
But i have to agree, North Korea is probably more dangerous than the previously mentioned country. Indeed, Pakistan has really huge amount of uranium resources, but they are not so stupid to start a nuclear war without any reason.

I would not be so sure about North Korea, they are the threat to the peace on our planet, because they are totally not afraid of launching their nuclear rockets on some independent country.

I hope that everybody knows what is going to happen when anyone will launch nukes aimed in different country?
An apocalypse.

Even North Korea is not as dangerous as Pakistan. I will explain. North Korea is unlikley to transfer their nuclear technology (which they developed themselves) to any third party. On the other hand, Pakistanis are likely to transfer both the technology and warheads to third party groups such as the Al Qaeda and the ISIS, as well as to nations such as Saudi Arabia.

I think Pakistan is not as dangerous as North Korea because they have no means of delivery of nuclear warheads long range. Don't bring terrorists a nuclear bomb in the bag across the border.. once the Americans feel the danger with them will be the same as with Kim.

[Podgor]

I'm not sure, it should be getting better there due to the internet and overall developement.

[joebrook]

Pakistan is a dangerous state and the threat is not posed by their leaders or citizens but rather due to the fact that it can fall easily to extremist and since they have nuclear weaponry, these can be used against anyone but mainly Israel and western countries in particular.

[gabmen]

Pakistan is a dangerous state and the threat is not posed by their leaders or citizens but rather due to the fact that it can fall easily to extremist and since they have nuclear weaponry, these can be used against anyone but mainly Israel and western countries in particular.

Scary thing though because that may already be happening at thia time or soon. Imagine ISIS having access to nuclear capability. It won't take them a second thought to use it against their so called "western invaders". Scary to think about it but the threat can be very real

[Diablo.me]

A Muslim country with nuclear weapons is certainly a threat.

[Sithara007]

A Muslim country with nuclear weapons is certainly a threat.

Pakistan is the only Muslim nation with nuclear weapons right now. And these people are likely to use them against their regional rivals (India, Afghanistan.etc) in the near future.

[Rizqi]

I agree with that statement, but first look at which country possesses the weapon, and whether it has been said to threaten if there is no concrete evidence, for now it is getting ready

[ekoice]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

Not at all.If a country should be said as Rogue nation for having nuclear weapons,then definitely US deserves to be called as a rogue nation.US has largest number of nuclear weapons and its a great threat to world peace,always threatening smaller countries.

Read question carefully its by sponsoring terrorism and not by having nuclear weapon  eventhough nuclear weapon is anothet factor

I would like to remember you who supported and gave weapons to bin laden to fight against Russia.Its the same country which points other smaller countries as a threat to world peace.

[Mometaskers]

Any nuclear armed country has the potential to be global threat. Even those without nukes would, if they adapt a belligerent approach to foreign policy. Remember, none of the Axis powers were nuclear during WWII.

I believe the real threat is if the government is controlled by warmongers and at the same time is not accountable to the people (though having a fundamentalist populace is a threat as well). Public outrage was one of the reasons America lost the Vietnam War. The Tet Offensive, though not successful militarily, definitely swayed public opinion against the war.

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

Not to mention Pakistan actually receive American aid. After the raid on Osama's compound many has started to think the Pakistan is not doing its fair share to fight terrorism. After all, no terrorism, less aid money.

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

Not at all.If a country should be said as Rogue nation for having nuclear weapons,then definitely US deserves to be called as a rogue nation.US has largest number of nuclear weapons and its a great threat to world peace,always threatening smaller countries.

Read question carefully its by sponsoring terrorism and not by having nuclear weapon  eventhough nuclear weapon is anothet factor

I would like to remember you who supported and gave weapons to bin laden to fight against Russia.Its the same country which points other smaller countries as a threat to world peace.

Did you just assume his nationality?   I would just like to ask, would you rather have allowed Russia to invade Afghanistan? Oh well, it's not like it would have worked well for Russia if they succeeded anyway. It was not called "graveyard of empires" for nothing.

[stompix]

there are more dangerous countries such as North Korea and Iran. I like Pakistan

Pakistan is as dangerous as North Korea. Both are rogue nations, and they are dangerous because they have nuclear weapons. IMO, we should be more worried about Pakistan, as they enjoy good international relations unlike the DPRK.

Lols , so we should be worried about nations that "enjoy good international relations ".
Is this reverse politics?

We should be worried about people that have friends , not about people that are threatening everybody in the world with a nuclear war.
Probably the biggest logic fail I've seen in the politics section.