portotoi
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 101
Blockchain with a Purpose
|
|
October 06, 2017, 07:53:48 AM |
|
I retry my Bitcoin Wallet Address,
Error : Sorry, No Balance on Snapshot - Block 463604 ! Please try again...
What does that mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Vigens
|
|
October 06, 2017, 08:00:46 AM |
|
I retry my Bitcoin Wallet Address,
Error : Sorry, No Balance on Snapshot - Block 463604 ! Please try again...
What does that mean?
It means that during the snapshot in April, you had no btc on that wallet.
|
|
|
|
bit247
Member
Offline
Activity: 123
Merit: 10
bitcoin.org
|
|
October 06, 2017, 09:19:16 AM |
|
don't be crazy this site advertising bitsend on the footer as wellbitcore.cc/claim.php
|
BTCitcoin: 35DtMsEK1g1xVMKh4V7beAyguiU9qcHwtF || ETH: Hacked
|
|
|
jkminkov
|
|
October 06, 2017, 09:21:05 AM |
|
why its not a fork? BTC hardfork will produce BGOLD. Its all over the news.
Too many projects parasitize on bitcoin and his fork. And all of them looks scammy. The number of bitcoin hard forks is starting to get a little ridiculous. That being said, I have been saying for a while that Bitcoin isn't the end all to be all and it is far easier to create anew than to constantly battle inevitable changes. It almost reminds me the continual fight in congress to increase the debt ceiling. It keeps coming up and to me this is the same with cryptocurrency and scaling. That is why bitcore is so nice because there will be no scaling issues for the forseeable future since it can currently handle 22.2 billion transactions per year. bitcore has built in tx fee, which may become a problem when price rises, I don't see a problem why you can't send 0 fee transactions with those empty blocks...
|
.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
|
|
|
AnTaVi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 10
|
|
October 06, 2017, 11:51:45 AM |
|
Great project, bought some coins.
|
|
|
|
Kryptowerk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1401
Disobey.
|
|
October 06, 2017, 04:51:23 PM Last edit: October 06, 2017, 05:10:25 PM by Kryptowerk |
|
Hello. I use a translator. I need help. I have a Ledger Nano. I can not sign my Bitcoin messages. He tells me. ('your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0' / 0xb11e ')). I do not know what to do. Thank you for your help...
Bonjour. J'utilise un traducteur. J'ai besoin d'aide. J'ai un Ledger Nano. Je ne peux pas signer mes messages Bitcoin. Il me dit. ((your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0'/0xb11e')). Je ne sais plus quoi faire. Merci pour votre aide...
There is nothing you can do. Except writing to the Ledger support and expressing your frustration. I have the same problem using this "old" ledger. I am not a dev, but implementing a signing function shouldn't take thaaat much effort. Pretty unhappy with the fact that they are not supporting this verison of Ledger anymore, I mean it is only a few years old. It's one of the reasons I prefere Trezor, my confidence in them supporting older products is higher. For those not beeing able to claim their BTX from the last snapshot, bear in mind a new snapshot will be taken on 30th of October! Just make sure for your Bitcoin to be in control of your private keys and/or have a working function to sign a message. If you are not sure if your wallet supports this, just google "walletXYZ sign message". The one I know support signing are: Ledger Nano S, Trezor, Electrum. I think blockchain.info does support signing, too, but not 100% sure, and there are several others for sure. Si tu parles seulement francais, c'est la forum pour toi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=13.0 : )
|
|
|
|
Bombardier
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:11:28 PM |
|
Hi, I also use trezor but i don't see signing option like i see it when i want to send dash or bitcoin cash .
|
|
|
|
CryptoRobert
|
|
October 06, 2017, 05:13:31 PM |
|
Hello. I use a translator. I need help. I have a Ledger Nano. I can not sign my Bitcoin messages. He tells me. ('your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0' / 0xb11e ')). I do not know what to do. Thank you for your help...
Bonjour. J'utilise un traducteur. J'ai besoin d'aide. J'ai un Ledger Nano. Je ne peux pas signer mes messages Bitcoin. Il me dit. ((your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0'/0xb11e')). Je ne sais plus quoi faire. Merci pour votre aide...
There is nothing you can do. Except writing to the Ledger support and expressing your frustration. I have the same problem using this "old" ledger. I am not a dev, but implementing a signing function shouldn't take thaaat much effort. Pretty unhappy with the fact that they are not supporting this verison of Ledger anymore, I mean it is only a few years old. It's one of the reasons I prefere Trezor, my confidence in them supporting older products is higher. For those not beeing able to claim their BTX from the last snapshot, bear in mind a new snapshot will be taken on 30th of October! Just make sure for your Bitcoin to be in control of your private keys and/or have a working function to sign a message. If you are not sure if your wallet supports this, just google "walletXYZ sign message". The one I know support signing are: Ledger Nano S, Trezor, Electrum. I think blockchain.info does support signing, too, but not 100% sure, and there are several others for sure. Si tu parles seulement francais, c'est la forum pour toi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=13.0 : )Is there anyone else who has experienced problems with Ledger Nano? By the way, any chance that Ledger and Trezor would one day support Bitcore?
|
|
|
|
e6ug
|
|
October 06, 2017, 10:08:17 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JK47XdeCrypT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 07, 2017, 08:14:49 AM |
|
I believe you should be able to import your private key into another BTC wallet and sign there, like Exodus, Ledger Nano S, Trezor, etc.
|
|
|
|
torrentco
|
|
October 07, 2017, 08:55:14 AM |
|
what was the pump like 3 weeks ago. i mean what was the reason it pumped like crazy. i am glad i got out of 20 k sat. may go in again if falls below 10k. it is very much like to go below 10k sat in october.
|
|
|
|
Kryptowerk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1401
Disobey.
|
|
October 07, 2017, 11:01:42 AM |
|
what was the pump like 3 weeks ago. i mean what was the reason it pumped like crazy. i am glad i got out of 20 k sat. may go in again if falls below 10k. it is very much like to go below 10k sat in october.
Wasn't one of the reasons the annoucement of the big airdrop? Not sure, I'm more interested in the longer perspective, not following every spike. Imo it only needs one or two whales buying in with 25+ BTC and the prices can rise quickly. Probably what happend back then. These sudden pumps aren't too healthy, because usually some people will "take profits" causing a temporary dump again. I prefere the steady holding/slow rise we are experiencing for a few weeks right now. Seems much more healthy. Personally I expect a steady growth over the long run, especially when all the bitcoin-hard fork hype is over and people slowly start looking for more stable options with longevity in mind. Time will tell, hodl will win. Just my personal opinion. ;>
|
|
|
|
beginneraf
|
|
October 07, 2017, 02:10:31 PM |
|
Hello. I use a translator. I need help. I have a Ledger Nano. I can not sign my Bitcoin messages. He tells me. ('your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0' / 0xb11e ')). I do not know what to do. Thank you for your help...
Bonjour. J'utilise un traducteur. J'ai besoin d'aide. J'ai un Ledger Nano. Je ne peux pas signer mes messages Bitcoin. Il me dit. ((your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0'/0xb11e')). Je ne sais plus quoi faire. Merci pour votre aide...
There is nothing you can do. Except writing to the Ledger support and expressing your frustration. I have the same problem using this "old" ledger. I am not a dev, but implementing a signing function shouldn't take thaaat much effort. Pretty unhappy with the fact that they are not supporting this verison of Ledger anymore, I mean it is only a few years old. It's one of the reasons I prefere Trezor, my confidence in them supporting older products is higher. For those not beeing able to claim their BTX from the last snapshot, bear in mind a new snapshot will be taken on 30th of October! Just make sure for your Bitcoin to be in control of your private keys and/or have a working function to sign a message. If you are not sure if your wallet supports this, just google "walletXYZ sign message". The one I know support signing are: Ledger Nano S, Trezor, Electrum. I think blockchain.info does support signing, too, but not 100% sure, and there are several others for sure. Si tu parles seulement francais, c'est la forum pour toi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=13.0 : )blockchain.info does support signing feature as well. I was able to create a wallet a few weeks ago and it also has this option to import a wallet address.
|
|
|
|
beginneraf
|
|
October 07, 2017, 02:28:28 PM |
|
what was the pump like 3 weeks ago. i mean what was the reason it pumped like crazy. i am glad i got out of 20 k sat. may go in again if falls below 10k. it is very much like to go below 10k sat in october.
Wasn't one of the reasons the annoucement of the big airdrop? Not sure, I'm more interested in the longer perspective, not following every spike. Imo it only needs one or two whales buying in with 25+ BTC and the prices can rise quickly. Probably what happend back then. These sudden pumps aren't too healthy, because usually some people will "take profits" causing a temporary dump again. I prefere the steady holding/slow rise we are experiencing for a few weeks right now. Seems much more healthy. Personally I expect a steady growth over the long run, especially when all the bitcoin-hard fork hype is over and people slowly start looking for more stable options with longevity in mind. Time will tell, hodl will win. Just my personal opinion. ;> I actually bought some at 144K and 150K sat just this past week. but it's ok. I'm actually after for the 3% weekly airdrop. Not bad after all
|
|
|
|
beginneraf
|
|
October 07, 2017, 03:19:11 PM |
|
By the way, just a question. I've read an article that after Nov2, you will no longer be able to receive the 3% weekly airdrop to your wallet unless you'd be able to register your BTX address on the online registration on the Bitcore website at the start of October. I've been visiting their website ever since this 1st week and I still do not see the online registration. Does anyone know why? Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
Anthony1985
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 251
Tic.eth
|
|
October 07, 2017, 05:28:08 PM |
|
Anyone willing to help me to claim the Bitcore?
I'm on ledger nano and can't sign a message, already tried to import the seed on a electrum, but when I try to sign the message the electrum wallet crashes. Anything I could do?
|
|
|
|
hous26
|
|
October 07, 2017, 05:30:47 PM |
|
Is the registration for Post-October airdrops available yet?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Anthony1985
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 251
Tic.eth
|
|
October 07, 2017, 06:17:55 PM |
|
Hello. I use a translator. I need help. I have a Ledger Nano. I can not sign my Bitcoin messages. He tells me. ('your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0' / 0xb11e ')). I do not know what to do. Thank you for your help...
Bonjour. J'utilise un traducteur. J'ai besoin d'aide. J'ai un Ledger Nano. Je ne peux pas signer mes messages Bitcoin. Il me dit. ((your device can only use a derivation path starting by 0'/0xb11e')). Je ne sais plus quoi faire. Merci pour votre aide...
Did you figure out how to do it? Seems like we got the same problem. I can't sign a message from my Ledger Nano, so I can't claim the bitcode. I tried importing my wallet on a Electrum but it doesn't work, when I sign a message the wallet crashes. I wonder to know if with a Ledger S would work, like importing the private key there and then sign the message.
|
|
|
|
|
beginneraf
|
|
October 07, 2017, 07:26:56 PM |
|
thanks for the link. Which group would they be active more?
|
|
|
|
|