Do you prefer 100% or 150% Welcome bonus ?

[swogerino]

Normally I prefer the higher bonus, the higher the better. The problem is I have yet to find a casino which doesn't have roll over requirements for these bonuses. They give you 100% welcome bonus but they force you to play slots or to have a 5x that amount roll over in all the games of the casino. With mathematical probability more than 80% of the times you will not benefit from these bonuses.

I have tried 5 bitcoin casinos and in 4 of them I have lost all this bonus and only one I have came out victorious. Statistical data are by me.

[darkangel11]

There are no dumb questions they say...
Everyone will choose 150%, because it's a bigger bonus. What would you choose if somebody would offer you $10 or $15 for free? Come on, what is this topic even about?
Normally bonuses are just to attract those, who don't know how they work. Most people will never make enough bets to qualify for the bonus.

You are not getting the picture here.

What if the waiger is requirement is far more easy with 100% bonus compare to 150% bonus? What will you choose then? For example, it's like earning $10 for 1 week compare to $20 for 3 weeks. Looks like you don't have any idea about waiger requirement for those bonus to be able to withdraw. Of course 150% is higher than 100% but I doubt many will choose that bonus requirement if the waiger requirement is difficult to achieved compare to the requirements of getting the 100%.

1. The question wasn't about the requirements but the bonus. If we are asked to choose between 100 and 150 we will always choose the latter.
2. You're purposely not making it proportional to prove your point. The question should be whether I'd choose $10 for 1 week or $15 for 1,5 weeks. In that case I'd still go with the bigger bonus.

[jtipt]

Do you prefer 100% or 150% Welcome bonus on the casinos ?

Seen this before, most of the deposit bonus comes with a ton of terms and conditions and how you can withdraw them and in 90% cases, you wouldn't be able to withdraw the bonus at all. Also, i have seen that a lot of scam casinos promote these deposit bonus to make players deposit in their casinos. So no thanks, I wouldn't take either of the bonus.

[sana54210]

Do you prefer 100% or 150% Welcome bonus on the casinos ?

I love claiming bonuses when they don't effect my initial deposit amounts like in duckdice.io right now.But if the bonus is something where my main bonus is also locked and needs wager to withdraw then I would never claim such bonuses.

One such site I can recall is BitCasino.io quite a bogus system there, the chat agents too don't know much and all they know is to apology if something is wrong.

[molsewid]

Do you prefer 100% or 150% Welcome bonus on the casinos ?

It will depends how website give me both are good atleast they're giving bonuses 100% welcome bonus can give me lot to free play their other games but much better if they will give us 150% much bigger and much more better <3 orayt.

[wuvdoll]

I try to completely ignore any bonus because i don't like to get stucked with just a bonus balance after losing for few rounds which i can't withdraw without meeting wagering requirement they have.

Exactly so do I. I have been betting since 2 years now and one thing I learn is never take a bonus on your deposit at least not on horrible sites like bitcasino.io because they just block our initial deposit too. I love to claim NO DEPOSIT BONUSES instead because they even if have big wager requirements, I am not risking anything from my own pocket and hence no issues.

[gabmen]

I'm not really a fan of bonuses but if given a choice, well why settle with the lower bonus if you can have a higher one? Though of course there are disclaimers first and you have to read through the regulations before you claim there bonuses. Usually the smaller the bonus the more legitimate they are than high percentage bonuses

[dunfida]

I'm not really a fan of bonuses but if given a choice, well why settle with the lower bonus if you can have a higher one? Though of course there are disclaimers first and you have to read through the regulations before you claim there bonuses. Usually the smaller the bonus the more legitimate they are than high percentage bonuses

Higher percentage bonuses can be also a legit one and we can see it on some casinos or gambling sites which they do offer high bonuses but the main problem here is the requirement which supposed to be high also which makes harder for us players or gamblers to reach out the required rollover that's is why I don't really care on bonuses at all if this bonus would be free without any strings attached then why not? Who doesn't love free things?

[bajing]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

[Red-Apple]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

not necessarily. it will all depend on the site you are gambling at. some of them have very strict and sometimes unreal rules that gives the players 0 chance of taking anything out and some have more relaxed rules.
in other words a casino may offer 150% bonus and still have better rules than other casino with 100% bonus.

[Supercrypt]

Normally I prefer the higher bonus, the higher the better. The problem is I have yet to find a casino which doesn't have roll over requirements for these bonuses. They give you 100% welcome bonus but they force you to play slots or to have a 5x that amount roll over in all the games of the casino. With mathematical probability more than 80% of the times you will not benefit from these bonuses.

I have tried 5 bitcoin casinos and in 4 of them I have lost all this bonus and only one I have came out victorious. Statistical data are by me.

You need to understand from the casinos viewpoint too, if they give you 150% bonus and being it a BTC casino you don't have to give any ID proofs then nothing stops you from making 1 million accounts and juicing the casino out of funds.

A site like bet365 offers big bonus without any big wager needs because they verify the user and know they are actually crediting only once.

[Winner]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

You might be right in a real life situation though the question didn't state that the Casino has a limitation on how the give out the Casino bonus. If the 100 % Casino bonus applied to your account and another group of people deposited the same amount of money also placed the same bets as you then received a Casino bonus of 150 % you  wouldn’t feel mad about it?
Maybe you want the Casino to just thrive with them trying to hold their money, I don’t know.

[lite]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

No i would choose neither. whether a casino provides a 100% or 200% bonus there always be some rollover requirements which btw would be x40+(standard rollover requirement of a casino).
i have tried many times to complete the rollover and there was only one time i got ~60% of deposited money.

[aTriz]

I think that most of the people would obviously choose the 150% deposit bonus instead of 100%, because that just gives us more money to wager.
In such a scenario, there is a higher chance of surviving a long streak of losses. It is clear that big part of the people participating in hypotetical survey would choose the higher percentage.

Still, such a bonus gives a lot, but the house edge does not change. It is also important how big is it, because more than 3% is already a lot.
That is why I prefer bonus which basically erases house edge for few hours. That is more interesting, and gives me more opportunities, than having 100% or 150% deposit bonus.

[marlboroza]

Do you prefer 100% or 150% Welcome bonus on the casinos ?

Well if i had to choose i would choose 150% - logically because it is bigger.

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

No i would choose neither. whether a casino provides a 100% or 200% bonus there always be some rollover requirements which btw would be x40+(standard rollover requirement of a casino).
i have tried many times to complete the rollover and there was only one time i got ~60% of deposited money.

Hm but some casinos changed rules about bonus and if you win something before using bonus money you can withdraw winnings(with losing bonus of course)..

[michnelli6]

Never ever use bonus if you dont want to be in touble with support

You will not be in trouble with the support but you will have trouble on how you are going to complete the things that you need in fulfill before being eligible for the bonus. I will prefer 100% bonus, for sure the requirements for it isn't that big unlike with 150%.

You are right, the wagering need is quite logical as the casino wants you to test the site with those funds. But some casinos are taking undue advantage of this by giving users lucrative offers and actually locking their balance.

I think any site that offers such casinos should make a bold line and say how much wager is required.

[marlboroza]

Normally I prefer the higher bonus, the higher the better. The problem is I have yet to find a casino which doesn't have roll over requirements for these bonuses. They give you 100% welcome bonus but they force you to play slots or to have a 5x that amount roll over in all the games of the casino. With mathematical probability more than 80% of the times you will not benefit from these bonuses.

I have tried 5 bitcoin casinos and in 4 of them I have lost all this bonus and only one I have came out victorious. Statistical data are by me.

They don't force you to do anything, it's only your choice to use bonuses and follow the wagering rules about them, after all they are not charity organization. As you said you lost 4/5 times, why do you keep using those bonuses anyway? Isn't it better to gamble with your money and take your winnings after you win something?

[batang_bitcoin]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

If all of the gamblers will choose 100% then why there are some gamblers here are choosing to get the 150% welcome bonus? I would love to choose that bonus too but I know it is not going to be an easy thing to do that. If the conditions that they are going to give me is not that high then I will still go with 150%.

[iluvbitcoins]

All gambler would choose 100% because the smaller the bonuses are taken of course you need to pass small turnover too. but all it's back to your personality.

If all of the gamblers will choose 100% then why there are some gamblers here are choosing to get the 150% welcome bonus? I would love to choose that bonus too but I know it is not going to be an easy thing to do that. If the conditions that they are going to give me is not that high then I will still go with 150%.

Nothing is stated in the OP about rollover
Amount bonus doesn't impact rollover amount

Therefore, I believe everyone would pick the 150% bonus

[HongKong]

 Tough question. Since the amount of the two bonuses have no other requirements against each other that allows the person to get the payment. It seems like there is something else going on with this question because the casino that is giving away the bonus does not know how much they are trying to give away. I think that the modest gambler or the adrenaline gamblers would choose the smaller amount because that would mean that they would make the money within no time anyhow so they don't really need that extra cash.
I would pick the larger amount.