World War 3

[craked5]

We the British always talk to our friends and cousins from around the world on what action should be taken before we ever go in..

But if we go in YOU HAVE DONE SOMETHING WRONG..

Suuuuuuuuuuuure

British is well known for not at all trying to wage war all around the world.

The British Empire? Man they had it coming! Those damn indigenes who were clearly threatening UK!

[Alexzap]

First i would like to say that World War III will happen in future, and there is no doubt about that. And second, well i think at first countries will not use nuclear weapon, because they know devastating power of it and consequences. But as war would go on and one side would start losing, well in that moment nuclear weapon will be used. That is only one option so...

Why do you think so? It has long been an informational and economic war. It is also an element of a third world war. Syria, Korea, Georgia, Ukraine. How many more must be international conflicts to understand that the war was going. Just its phase is not as active as we used to know from history.

[Okurkabinladin]

In case you missed it, we are already experiencing World War 3, but of course it's slightly different than the bombings and casualties of the previous 2.

It's called NWO, and the big Generals (IMF, banks and big corporations) have under their economic and financial dictatorship the majority of the population, and under their possession almost every natural resources on the planet.

Presidents, goverments and politicians in general are just the pawns. Civilians are the victims. By the way, Europe is under islamic occupation right now...

NWO, while absolutely real is merely description of status quo. Not an act of war, sir.

There was global competition for resources long before First World War, but for apocalyptic sects nobody called it "war" back then.

I would point you to the work of Clausewitz for what total war means. Nations and or empires turn into rabid dogs to tear "the others" to shreds or die in an attempt. We are not there yet.

[squatz1]

Well I wouldn't call these countries stupid for using nukes, I think the only people who are going to end up nukes is just going to start the chain of a full nuking World War where the entire world is just destroyed by people just firing these at each-other. I know some people say that WW2 was the "War to end all wars" but this will be that one if it comes up, and it'll also end human civilization as we know it.

We would already be fighting the ww3 if Hillary had win.

+1 to that, the news companies were coming out with stories that if Clinton won the defense contractors would've seen a boost in work and stock price. So, I guess she'd have to be pouring money into them.

I believe the ww3 will not being allowed to use nukes, that will destroy the world and ruined the entire ecosystem.

Yeah bud in war no one cares about what you're "Not allowed" to do, the rules kinda change. In better words, there are no rules even if some countries try to set the "Rules of War"

[Alexzap]

I do think that this current sluggish world war worse because it can last forever. The manifestations of Islamic terrorism is also an element of war. We don't know who to direct them. Maybe the guiding hand of terrorists in Europe is also located in Europe.

[Immobilising]

In case you missed it, we are already experiencing World War 3, but of course it's slightly different than the bombings and casualties of the previous 2.

It's called NWO, and the big Generals (IMF, banks and big corporations) have under their economic and financial dictatorship the majority of the population, and under their possession almost every natural resources on the planet.

Presidents, goverments and politicians in general are just the pawns. Civilians are the victims. By the way, Europe is under islamic occupation right now...

I wouldn't call it a world war, if you can call it something already. Can't deny there's a lot going on in the world though and pretty sure things are going to escalate somewhere really soon. Also hacking and other 'virtual warfare' is playing a big role right now and in the future.

[darklus123]

England only shows off as they cannot use nukes. You know the international rule which is with the consent of all big nations, who ever uses nuclear weapons ,that country will be eradicated from earth after doing so. It is not in the interest of anyone to use nuclear weapons. World war 3 seems not far ahead though with all these clowns leading extremely developed countries with Trump being the most stupid president of US of all time.

I cant agree with you with regards to that. Of course they know the consequences of a nuclear war. Yet they still make nuclears which is obviously be going to be detonated when they are threaten. They know how scary it is that is why they are willing to use it to defend their land

[Marcus_2017]

In case you missed it, we are already experiencing World War 3, but of course it's slightly different than the bombings and casualties of the previous 2.

It's called NWO, and the big Generals (IMF, banks and big corporations) have under their economic and financial dictatorship the majority of the population, and under their possession almost every natural resources on the planet.

Presidents, goverments and politicians in general are just the pawns. Civilians are the victims. By the way, Europe is under islamic occupation right now...

I wouldn't call it a world war, if you can call it something already. Can't deny there's a lot going on in the world though and pretty sure things are going to escalate somewhere really soon. Also hacking and other 'virtual warfare' is playing a big role right now and in the future.

From what you acknowledge or not that the war is already underway, nothing will change. In this war every day people die. You can like the ostrich to hide its head in the sand, but this does not mean that people will stop dying in this war.

[iamTom123]

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

This is ridiculous! England is not even a super-power. Their armed forces are not even capable of defeating third world nations such as Nigeria or Pakistan. Even if they are having the nukes, what will they do with them? They don't have any ICBMs.

You got a good analysis. England or Great Britain for that matter is no more a superpower economically and militarily...in World War2 yes it was powerful but after that great war its power fade fast and is now reduced into an insignificant regional player. Look at its navy now and how weak it is compared to other countries like Russia and China. If there would be a global war right now, Britain may not be able to contribute much in a coalition of the willing to defeat the enemies.

[Barrymore]

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

This is ridiculous! England is not even a super-power. Their armed forces are not even capable of defeating third world nations such as Nigeria or Pakistan. Even if they are having the nukes, what will they do with them? They don't have any ICBMs.

You got a good analysis. England or Great Britain for that matter is no more a superpower economically and militarily...in World War2 yes it was powerful but after that great war its power fade fast and is now reduced into an insignificant regional player. Look at its navy now and how weak it is compared to other countries like Russia and China. If there would be a global war right now, Britain may not be able to contribute much in a coalition of the willing to defeat the enemies.

Have you seen what the Russian Navy? All vehicles built over 20 years ago. The flagship of the Russian Navy "Admiral Kuznetsov" laugh the whole world during his trip in the tugs to the coast of Syria.

[Sithara007]

I do think that this current sluggish world war worse because it can last forever. The manifestations of Islamic terrorism is also an element of war. We don't know who to direct them. Maybe the guiding hand of terrorists in Europe is also located in Europe.

The real threat to World War comes from Islamic terrorists. The ISIS and its leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi can get the nuclear weapons from Pakistan (where many members of the government sympathize with the Islamists). They can also get the short-range ballistic missiles from Yemen or the DPRK.

[Alexzap]

I do think that this current sluggish world war worse because it can last forever. The manifestations of Islamic terrorism is also an element of war. We don't know who to direct them. Maybe the guiding hand of terrorists in Europe is also located in Europe.

The real threat to World War comes from Islamic terrorists. The ISIS and its leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi can get the nuclear weapons from Pakistan (where many members of the government sympathize with the Islamists). They can also get the short-range ballistic missiles from Yemen or the DPRK.

Pakistan can be a threat only to India, but India also has something to say, and so there will never be used for nuclear weapons. Russia is more a threat than Pakistan. At the same time Russian never also will not use nuclear weapons. From the Russians comes the phantom menace. They are cowardly destroy the country from within through bribery of corrupt officials.

[JGoRed]

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

I don't think that countries (other than N Korea) would use nukes in todays day and age, mostly because nuking just means you'll be nuked (and then everybody loses).

[chixka000]

Conflict with regards to north korea and Us are getting worse. Yesterday Uss vinson are now heading to the land of singapore and will be staying their until they received another call from trump. This action is for the last nuclear test lunch of north korea.

[Alexzap]

Conflict with regards to north korea and Us are getting worse. Yesterday Uss vinson are now heading to the land of singapore and will be staying their until they received another call from trump. This action is for the last nuclear test lunch of north korea.

Americans use against North Korea tactics anacondas. They gradually squeeze the Kim regime into a powerful embrace. The more Kim is trying to move the more Americans squeeze hug. At the first attempt Kim to attack it will be destroyed. I think he understands and will soon give up.

[LostWords]

It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?

[yugo23]

It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?

Lol
If there is a WW3 btc is the last of your concern xD
You should be more concerned about NOT DYING

Money is useless in times of war. All that count is food and shelter.

[Mometaskers]

There's a price to pay for using nukes since someone would aslo likely nuke you back... back to the stone age. I doubt anyone from NATO would just go out and nuke without notice since other members would have to be consulted and negotiated with. China also unlikely since, you know, exports. There's no benefit to killing your customers. Russia, I'm not sure but they can just stick to conventional warfare + guerrilla tactic like they did in Crimea.

Now, North Korea, that's a whole different scenario. They pretty much survived without foreign interaction anyway so they have less incentives in keeping relationships. They would still probably not just push a button though, daddy China would not be pleased.

I believe the ww3 will not being allowed to use nukes, that will destroy the world and ruined the entire ecosystem.

Never underestimate human capacity for stupidity.

[LostWords]

It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?

Lol
If there is a WW3 btc is the last of your concern xD
You should be more concerned about NOT DYING

Money is useless in times of war. All that count is food and shelter.

I believe that in a war between China/Russia vs United States, Europe won't be that much in trouble. The Netherlands even less. I have seen a map where you could see that Europe wouldn't directly be in danger in case of Nukes. Ofcourse, the aftermath of the bombing will also be terrible for 'us' but more in a way of; electricity, health problems and such. I believe that should be temprorary then but I must say I haven't read enough on this matter to know what I am talking about .

[kpcian]

I don't believe that world war 3 will happen very soon, but I certainly want to say that if world war 3 happen then it will lead huge destruction by nuclear weapons. recent activities of USA and other countries are just to be meant of showing their arrogance.