World War 3

[Sithara007]

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

[chixka000]

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

Wrong as well russian nuclear weapons are somehow useless at all because US has more anti nuclear weapons and nope it is not true that russia has more nuclear weapons than Us they are actually just the same

[Sithara007]

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

Wrong as well russian nuclear weapons are somehow useless at all because US has more anti nuclear weapons and nope it is not true that russia has more nuclear weapons than Us they are actually just the same

If the Russian weapons were actually useless, then NATO could have invaded that country many decades back. And regarding the number of nukes in the possession of each country, check this:

[criptix]

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

Want to know another fact majority of russias nukes are more then 50 years old and need to be renewed. But sadly russia has no $$ for that.

[Okurkabinladin]

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

[criptix]

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Edit

Islamic terrorism just bought 460 billion $ worth of US hightech weapons.
They can wage war through the whole century now.

[Okurkabinladin]

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Yes, communism is absolutely vile ideology - and Russians unlike corrupted european governments actually publicly denounced and dismantled it   current system of the country is far closer to pre-communist Tsarist system, mixing nationalism and religion of forefathers.

Mecca of communism today is in Brussels, not in Moscow... to my shock.

[criptix]

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Yes, communism is absolutely vile ideology - and Russians unlike corrupted european governments actually publicly denounced and dismantled it  current system of the country is far closer to pre-communist Tsarist system, mixing nationalism and religion of forefathers.

Mecca of communism today is in Brussels, not in Moscow... to my shock.

I was talking about the udssr. Todays russia is an oligarchy.

@brüssel

Socialism != communism

[Proton2233]

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

[Wayan_Pedjeng]

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

[Lecsor]

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

[planfox]

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

[Katsudu]

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

And how much it became known from the media Donald Trump another aircraft carrier sent to the North Korean region and it seems to me that this will not be with the enchanting movement of the Allied army including NATO. It seems to me that under certain circumstances, China and Russia will not support the presidents of North Korea. Perhaps the people of North Korea really need to be given the freedom to see the world and not what the authorities say to them.

[kimtaekayo]

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

Oligarchs are everywhere and this war will be funded by them.
If you are familiar with the Rothschild.

[Lieldoryn]

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

Oligarchs are everywhere and this war will be funded by them.
If you are familiar with the Rothschild.

No, the oligarchs are unable to Finance that which is contrary to the interests of the state. When Rothschild was concentrated in his hands the entire oil industry of America and began to influence the policy of his business was split into smaller companies which could have a significant impact. So do in countries where the government is not about shady schemes with the oligarchs.

[Sithara007]

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

A conflict involving North Korea will not deteriorate in to a world war. If a war happens, then they will be on their own. No one will come to their rescue, including China and Russia.

[bartolo]

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

I think superpowers accumulate atomic bombs as an element of dissuasion, not really to use them. Nowadays the scenario of a nuclear war seems unlikely because it would take the world to the apocalypse. Even when anti-missile shields have been developed, it would only take 1% to fail for a global disaster to occur. Current atomic bombs are much more powerful than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The one of Hiroshima was of 15 kilotones, the one of Nagasaki of 21 kilotones. Today there is Castle Bravo of 15,000 kilotones and the Tsar Bomb of 50000 kilotons. In this graph you can see the comparison based on the nuclear fungus that these bombs produce.

[Sithara007]

I think superpowers accumulate atomic bombs as an element of dissuasion, not really to use them. Nowadays the scenario of a nuclear war seems unlikely because it would take the world to the apocalypse. Even when anti-missile shields have been developed, it would only take 1% to fail for a global disaster to occur. Current atomic bombs are much more powerful than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The one of Hiroshima was of 15 kilotones, the one of Nagasaki of 21 kilotones. Today there is Castle Bravo of 15,000 kilotones and the Tsar Bomb of 50000 kilotons. In this graph you can see the comparison based on the nuclear fungus that these bombs produce.

You are right about the potency of the modern nuclear weapons. For example, Tsar Bomba is having a blast radius of around 35 km. Probably, anyone living within the 100 km to 200km radius of the epicenter has very little chance of survival.

[Gelap]

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

This is ridiculous! England is not even a super-power. Their armed forces are not even capable of defeating third world nations such as Nigeria or Pakistan. Even if they are having the nukes, what will they do with them? They don't have any ICBMs.

Yes, that England should win must happen a miracle. The presence of nuclear weapons is not an indicator of strength.

Yes I really agree with you

Nuclear weapons are not all of them

There are many more technological weapons.
The English country can not make world war 3 only by nuclear only.

[Xenrise]

This is very devastating to us, people. The best thing for us to evade this is to pray hard. This kind of cases should not be tolerated. During world war 2 I've heard the story of my grandmother almost everyday the only food they ate is only a bread. And I dont want everyone to suffer it. Its so hard we should imagine the outcome of this before going to war, every leader should mind these things-> treasure(economy), people, and their lands.