I was really liking this when I was reading and the more I read the less I liked it. So, if I understand, and I am not sure I do. You will use our money to invest so the risk is 100% ours - then, we will get some undefined return on successful projects and lose all of our investment on others. Like you said some projects win and some lose. Except you are guaranteed to never lose. When your share of the profits is high enough and your selection process of choosing startups improves, you will cut us out and move forward alone.
RF is just the legal background to raise fund in crypto. What matter for you are the startups.
A minimum return is guaranteed no matter if the startup make profit, that's part of the contract. They have to pay a % per year and having tokens grant you those payments.
Nothing will be cut, we will continue to raise fund if money is needed but having capital may allow RF to take more risk on its own.
I think I have it, unless investment is split among a lot of projects. That would diversify our risk as we would have the potential to lose on some and gain on some.
Would you be interesting in investing in a portfolio instead of startups separately ?
Do you think it is better ?
We already mitigate the risk a lot by selecting startups for you. I don't think splitting among all projects automatically is necessary.
It's probably better to give investors the choice. You may not like all startups.
