alabamafan1
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:25:24 PM |
|
If anyone is afraid they won't get their winnings I'll offer 80% the prize in cash equivalent.
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:23:07 PM |
|
Name: vendetahome Posts: 107 Activity: 107
With last 15 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 5 BTC
You may participate if you have less than 100 posts, but you must have 100 posts or more by December 20th 2013 or you will not be eligible.
Looks like Scrat has some cleanup to do.
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:26:43 PM |
|
Name: terman45x Posts: 106 Activity: 106
With last 7 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 1 BTC
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:29:35 PM |
|
Name: poewerden Posts: 105 Activity: 105 Position: Full Member
With last 7 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 1 BTC
LOL, and the fake accounts keep on rolling.
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:31:07 PM |
|
Name: vendetahome Posts: 107 Activity: 107
With last 15 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 5 BTC
You may participate if you have less than 100 posts, but you must have 100 posts or more by December 20th 2013 or you will not be eligible.
Looks like Scrat has some cleanup to do.
Nope, I had to delete few posts after 1. Jan, The scrat approved the final list of participants and I had over 100 posts. I delete some messages from time to time...
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:34:56 PM |
|
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
No, your wrong, I checked the final list of 175 participants made on 31 Dec and everyone had signature and 100 posts or more...
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:43:22 PM |
|
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
No, your wrong, I checked the final list of 175 participants made on 31 Dec and everyone had signature and 100 posts or more... Aha, and all of a sudden since 1st of Jan you deleted 8 messages? Yep I especially like how your fake account was rolling them posts in "Let's Count to 21 Million with Images" thread, along with every other fake account I mentioned previously.
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:47:55 PM |
|
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
No, your wrong, I checked the final list of 175 participants made on 31 Dec and everyone had signature and 100 posts or more... Aha, and all of a sudden since 1st of Jan you deleted 8 messages? Yep Maybe some messages was deleted by moderators, I remember I deleted few BTW we could say with this logic those who removed their signature are disqualified as well (like you) because we cannot be sure anymore when they changed the signature
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:57:43 PM |
|
My verify is easy. (Not that I even care about that.) All we have to do is ask yangwaohttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191176.480How he counted that list. At least unlike all the fake accounts on here I don't make redundant posts in Newbies forums to get to 100 posts. lol If you read my posts I actually contribute to the BTC community.
|
|
|
|
notserp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:04:13 PM |
|
Name: poewerden Posts: 105 Activity: 105 Position: Full Member
With last 7 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 1 BTC
LOL, and the fake accounts keep on rolling.
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:08:48 PM |
|
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good
I was checking the 175 list on 31.Dec, and everyone had signature and over 100 posts. I would complain otherwise, because it would increase my chances
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:10:46 PM |
|
Name: poewerden Posts: 105 Activity: 105 Position: Full Member
With last 7 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 1 BTC
LOL, and the fake accounts keep on rolling.
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good Actually all the stuff can be checked. There is a LOG for everything. Like what IP a user is connected from, was their post deleted.. etc... Not my first forum I've been running. Just depends on how clean Scrat wants to make this.
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:16:48 PM |
|
Actually all the stuff can be checked. There is a LOG for everything. Like what IP a user is connected from, was their post deleted.. etc... Not my first forum I've been running. Just depends on how clean Scrat wants to make this. Seems fair, you can let admin check my post count on 20 Dec-31 Dec and when the messages from last year were deleted (if he has logs when and what message was deleted)
|
|
|
|
johnmatrix
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:18:53 PM |
|
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good
I was checking the 175 list on 31.Dec, and everyone had signature and over 100 posts. I would complain otherwise, because it would increase my chances I was checking your history and it seems like its game over for you, no matter if you made only spam on off topic and newbies but you dint had 100 post on january 1.. and if the mods deleted some post of you is another evidence of spamming, next time dont forget about making the neccesary post on all of your accounts, or even better, dont try to cheat/abuse promotions again.
|
|
|
|
Namworld
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:25:59 PM |
|
"You may participate if you have less than 100 posts, but you must have 100 posts or more by December 20th 2013 or you will not be eligible."
Not January 1st. When the final list was being reviewed, I'm pretty sure everyone had 100 posts. Doesn't matter if some have been deleted afterward.
I went over the final list before January 1st and everyone had 100 posts or more at the time. I am pretty sure the list is accurate.
No rules against duplicate accounts either. Not possible to prove/disprove duplicates anyway. So the list of eligible accounts should be final. I don't think that will change.
As for Scrat, he showed up for a short time on IRC. He's had flu complication, pneumonia. I haven't heard from him in a while. If he doesn't show up soon, John K. isn't around often but he still comes to the forum. He can distribute winnings and I'm sure he can be trusted.
I'm confident every winner will receive their winnings.
|
|
|
|
johnmatrix
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:29:31 PM |
|
"You may participate if you have less than 100 posts, but you must have 100 posts or more by December 20th 2013 or you will not be eligible."
Not January 1st. When the final list was being reviewed, I'm pretty sure everyone had 100 posts. Doesn't matter if some have been deleted afterward.
I went over the final list before January 1st and everyone had 100 posts or more at the time. I am pretty sure the list is accurate.
No rules against duplicate accounts either. Not possible to prove/disprove duplicates anyway. So the list of eligible accounts should be final. I don't think that will change.
As for Scrat, he showed up for a short time on IRC. He's had flu complication, pneumonia. I haven't heard from him in a while. If he doesn't show up soon, John K. isn't around often but he still comes to the forum. He can distribute winnings and I'm sure he can be trusted.
I'm confident every winner will receive their winnings.
As zurg said, john k himself can verify if that "deleted post" even exist, because yangwao made that list like 10 days late or more.
|
|
|
|
vendetahome
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:29:40 PM |
|
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good
I was checking the 175 list on 31.Dec, and everyone had signature and over 100 posts. I would complain otherwise, because it would increase my chances I was checking your history and it seems like its game over for you, no matter if you made only spam on off topic and newbies but you dint had 100 post on january 1.. and if the mods deleted some post of you is another evidence of spamming, next time dont forget about making the neccesary post on all of your accounts. So how about the signatures, how you prove all 175 participants had coinroll signature on 31.dec when you dont believe yangwao list confirmed by Scrat. Remember Scrat pruned all users on 31.Dec in the raffle thread and keept only those 175 meeting raffle rules...
|
|
|
|
Namworld
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:34:28 PM |
|
"You may participate if you have less than 100 posts, but you must have 100 posts or more by December 20th 2013 or you will not be eligible."
Not January 1st. When the final list was being reviewed, I'm pretty sure everyone had 100 posts. Doesn't matter if some have been deleted afterward.
I went over the final list before January 1st and everyone had 100 posts or more at the time. I am pretty sure the list is accurate.
No rules against duplicate accounts either. Not possible to prove/disprove duplicates anyway. So the list of eligible accounts should be final. I don't think that will change.
As for Scrat, he showed up for a short time on IRC. He's had flu complication, pneumonia. I haven't heard from him in a while. If he doesn't show up soon, John K. isn't around often but he still comes to the forum. He can distribute winnings and I'm sure he can be trusted.
I'm confident every winner will receive their winnings.
As zurg said, john k himself can verify if that "deleted post" even exist, because yangwao made that list like 10 days late or more. All non-eligible accounts where deleted from the thread long before yangwao made that list. Only Scrat could delete posts in that thread. I checked it shortly afterward and as far as I recall, it looked right.
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:38:49 PM Last edit: January 18, 2014, 12:04:03 AM by zurg |
|
Well, rules are rules and nothing in them say anything about duplicate of fake accounts. I just think this raffle is on a fast pace to become a classic example on how not to run one without "proper" rules. All good though, there is always Karma. My list of Fake accounts in the winner circle: (It's not that hard to figure out why) 66. imamanandyou 169. vendetahome 136. hope4me36. datguyian 5. Amph 90. clearcrystal 108. jerelimZ 122. stromma4419. pvtbrutus 72. CoinDiver 57. adworker1. uvwvj 27. yurimir 157. pokerFace2150. johnmatrix 161. kolesozw28. AquaMan 30. teste 91. nerFohanzo 103. hellfrozenow131. AFox 59. over1977v 80. terman45x 84. poewerden69. Unluckyduck 128. xephireusMMX 7. miner2020 100. zeraTunerse54. testconpastas2 173. zeta129. bigtimespaghetti
|
|
|
|
notserp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 18, 2014, 12:09:58 AM |
|
Name: poewerden Posts: 105 Activity: 105 Position: Full Member
With last 7 posts in 2014.
DISQUALIFIED 1 BTC
LOL, and the fake accounts keep on rolling.
Looks like whoever was behind it didn't really read the rules or forgot the number of posts they are supposed to have by when.
yeah they was late with the list they prob didnt check too good Actually all the stuff can be checked. There is a LOG for everything. Like what IP a user is connected from, was their post deleted.. etc... Not my first forum I've been running. Just depends on how clean Scrat wants to make this. i hope they check everything again, usually one of the main rules in any give away is one entry per person
|
|
|
|
|