So Lauda is Theymos

[kiklo]

So I removed all of the negative trust on everyone linked to Lauda,

Because Theymos has rigged the trust system so their shit paints my name red and it hides all of their red marks,

So I removed it as their was no point.

Even went and created a new screen name , so Lauda makes it a point to even leave that screen names negative trust .

Here is Lauda's Trust that Theymos aka Lauda has set hidden





See All of that Red Negative Remarks, if that was you or me, it would count against us and show that Do not Trade Message.

But with Lauda aka Theymos, none of the negative shows up because they tweaked the trust settings so they always have zero negative , you have to look at the untrusted feedbacks , which they are the asshats controlling the settings.


 

[1714830217]

1714830217

[unamis76]

This isn't Bitcoin Discussion and should be moved to Meta. If you find that default trust ratings do not represent who you trust, you can tweak them.

[kiklo]

This isn't Bitcoin Discussion and should be moved to Meta. If you find that default trust ratings do not represent who you trust, you can tweak them.

You can tweak what you see, but others see the false ratings Lauda aka theymos includes but they hide their negative ratings.


 

FYI:
Mods work for lauda, they will hide this topic soon like they do with everything else on this corrupt forum.

[Viscount]

This is unacceptable, you should lodge a complaint to your BTU president.

[kiklo]

This is unacceptable, you should lodge a complaint to your BTU president.

See this under your screen name
   -2: -1 / +0
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
That is what Lauda did to me, not funny is it.

I will remove yours as soon as you post you saw it.
It was just to make a point.

 

[Viscount]

only you can see how you rate someone because you are undependable, I can not

[Lauda]

only you can see how you rate someone because you are undependable, I can not

Your trust rating is fine. Kiklo changed their own trust list to think that their ratings actually matter, i.e. showing signs of delusions. Your trust rating is fine:


Why two threads? Good luck proving this.

[kiklo]

only you can see how you rate someone because you are undependable, I can not

It looked like this , and others can see it.



 


FYI:
Lauda was blocked.  

Actually Lauda , you are Theymos so the burden of proof is on you.

[Lauda]

only you can see how you rate someone because you are undependable, I can not

It looked like this , and others can see it.

Which is an outright lie or you're delusional. You are not trustworthy, therefore nobody added you into DT, therefore your ratings have 0 effect.

[kiklo]

only you can see how you rate someone because you are undependable, I can not

It looked like this , and others can see it.

Which is an outright lie or you're delusional. You are not trustworthy, therefore nobody added you into DT, therefore your ratings have 0 effect.

It was a screen print dumb ass.


 

[Lauda]

It was a screen print dumb ass.

Completely irrelevant. You're the only one who sees it like that as you've manipulated your own trust settings. Your trust ratings are completely worthless to anyone else.

[kiklo]

It was a screen print dumb ass.

Completely irrelevant. You're the only one who sees it like that as you've manipulated your own trust settings. Your trust ratings are completely worthless to anyone else.

But you Theymos manipulate the trust to show red to other for your propaganda tactics.   


 

[actmyname]

Lauda was blocked. 

Why do you senselessly block someone when you're going to read what they say anyway? If you were trying to send a message, this is not the right way of doing it.

But you Theymos manipulate the trust to show red to other for your propaganda tactics.   

But then why don't I have a trust rating of -128 with all the negative feedback sent to me?

[kiklo]

Lauda was blocked.  

Why do you senselessly block someone when you're going to read what they say anyway? If you were trying to send a message, this is not the right way of doing it.

But you Theymos manipulate the trust to show red to other for your propaganda tactics.  

But then why don't I have a trust rating of -128 with all the negative feedback sent to me?

Yours is rigged like Lauda'  everything is placed in Untrusted feedback which is not counted.

But Lauda's shows up in my trusted feedback, so the red shows up when others view my screen name.
But mine and everyone negative feedback to his goes to untrusted.

Which is bullshit.


 

FYI:
Lauda aka theymos is part of this shit
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5kjqy3/bitcointalkorg_staff_are_now_leaving_users/

[yahoo62278]

You're showing how ignorant you are with threads like this. Our ratings(mine, Lauda, and many others) show up on everyones public posts because we are in Default Trust. Since the forum doesn't moderate scams or scammers, it's kind of like we moderate them. You can view who all is in this list pretty easily. If you need shown how, just ask.

Anyone else who leaves someone a rating is shown on the users trust but its not shown on their posts under trust because a user who left the rating is not on Default Trust. Doesn't mean the rating isn't still there or anything. People just pay more attention to a DT rating as we are considered a little more trustworthy

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account?   There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works.  Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

[Avirunes]

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account?   There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works.  Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

This guy never had any interest to know better. You can check his posts . He was right from the start interested in altcoins and was particularly supporting one: zeitcoin(altcoin).

Doesn't surprises me btw. Seems like Lauda got someone to play with.

[Lauda]

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account?   There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. 

This is another fine example of why the current ranking system is very deceiving and often leads to a fake sense of security and scams. In our case, kiklo is anything but "legendary". He/she/it does not even know the basics of the trust system.

Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

We can't all be intelligent and educated beings, can we now? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

He was right from the start interested in altcoins and was particularly supporting one: zeitcoin(altcoin).

Which would then indicate that they have had at least one previous account?

Doesn't surprises me btw. Seems like Lauda got someone to play with.

Didn't you mean to say, *theymos got someone to play with*?

[Quickseller]

They are not the same.

[Zepher]

Kiklo, if you genuinely think that Lauda = theymos, then you really are delusional. These little temper tantrums you are having repeatedly are not doing you any favours. Just accept what has happened and move on. You are acting like you have become obsessed with Lauda at this point. Christ man, grow up.