Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

I would like to apologize publicly here, I didn't want to use AI to make posts and to reach my campaign number, I follow football a lot and I know what to talk about, unfortunately I tried to translate some posts I had made from Italian to English (which is not my language and I have difficulty with it), I only did it to try to translate the posts but then he added something else by modifying the content, I apologize to you again for what happened, I hope may you understand and forgive my gesture, thank you.

[Alone055]

I would like to apologize publicly here

It's good that you have realized your mistake and are apologetic.

No, wait, what??

I didn't want to use AI to make posts and to reach my campaign number, I follow football a lot and I know what to talk about, unfortunately I tried to translate some posts I had made from Italian to English (which is not my language and I have difficulty with it), I only did it to try to translate the posts but then he added something else by modifying the content,

Bro, that's a lie. You might know about football, and I wouldn't say anything about that because I don't have too much time to read through all your posts only to find out if you are actually knowledgeable about the sport or not, but what you said about your intentions and the way of using AI for your posts in not true.

First of all, an AI model would never use this sentence when you ask it to translate a text:

"As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available."

ChatGPT uses such sentences when asked to generate something, like making a prediction, analyzing, or sharing an opinion.

Secondly, an AI model works on algorithms, so there is no chance that it would add something extra in a text that you have asked to be translated, it will only go through the data it has and will match and find the translation for you, that's it.

I apologize to you again for what happened, I hope may you understand and forgive my gesture, thank you.

Asking for forgiveness while not actually admitting things properly or being actually sorry doesn't make any sense. It would have been better if you could admit that you used an AI model to generate posts and then post them as your own and you wouldn't do that in the future so that the community could see if you can live up to your words or not.

[Rikafip]

I follow football a lot and I know what to talk about

Yet just yesterday you wrote that Messi is still at PSG and there's not a person who follows football a lot that doesn't know he left them more than a year ago. Unfortunately for you, ChatGPT (or whichever AI tool you used) doesn't have an up to date data. Or maybe you indeed follow football (and that wouldn't be a surprise since you are Italian), but you were too lazy to actually proofread what AI wrote for you.

I only did it to try to translate the posts but then he added something else by modifying the content

Another lie. Its pretty obvious from that first reported post that you asked ChatGPT for an opinion\analysis, and not just to translate the post.

So yeah, that's a pretty bad apology that will only make your situation even worse.

[Lucius]

...I only did it to try to translate the posts but then he added something else by modifying the content, I apologize to you again for what happened, I hope may you understand and forgive my gesture, thank you.

If you're playing with fire, expect to get burned - especially if you don't know what you're doing (which is obviously the case with you). If you wanted to translate something, then you use something simple like Google translator, and not translate with the help of AI. Therefore, your explanation is quite bad, especially if we take into account what @Rikafip noticed - if you follow football seriously, you would know where such a famous player plays.

[Rikafip]

especially if we take into account what @Rikafip noticed - if you follow football seriously, you would know where such a famous player plays.

It was @Alone055 who noticed it first, not me.

If you wanted to translate something, then you use something simple like Google translator, and not translate with the help of AI.

I know that translation wasn't the (main) reason why he used AI tool, but from my experience, ChatGPT does a much better job at it than Google Translate.

[lovesmayfamilis]

especially if we take into account what @Rikafip noticed - if you follow football seriously, you would know where such a famous player plays.

It was @Alone055 who noticed it first, not me.

If you wanted to translate something, then you use something simple like Google translator, and not translate with the help of AI.

I know that translation wasn't the (main) reason why he used AI tool, but from my experience, ChatGPT does a much better job at it than Google Translate.

If you look at the translation of the merits that Sg4j1n3ll0 made, then he has a very clear picture of the prevalence of favorites. I checked these accounts; they also use the AI tool to post in the sports section, all belong to the Italian local section, and even communicate with each other, quoting. It is difficult to believe in such coincidences. I have not checked them for other coincidences, but such interaction suggests that all three (or more) are controlled by one person Sg4j1n3ll0.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.680

[Rikafip]

If you look at the translation of the merits that Sg4j1n3ll0 made, then he has a very clear picture of the prevalence of favorites. I checked these accounts; they also use the AI tool to post in the sports section, all belong to the Italian local section, and even communicate with each other, quoting. It is difficult to believe in such coincidences. I have not checked them for other coincidences, but such interaction suggests that all three (or more) are controlled by one person Sg4j1n3ll0.

While exchanging merit between local board members is quite common and its happenning probably on all local boards, their posting style indeed looks somewhat similar but its very hard to make any definitive conclusion based solely on that. Members of Italian board could probably check it out better to see whether there are any more similarities in their posting style.

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...

[lovesmayfamilis]

I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...

Quite a strange coincidence, isn't it? Why is it in the Italian section, and with those accounts you exchanged merits, that so many posts were found that were written by an AI tool?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64605694#msg64605694
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64605893#msg64605893

I would say more: anyone who doubts that all the accounts found belong to one person can follow how these accounts quote other people's posts. I am sure they will find a lot of matches.
It is very easy to get merits in the Italian section, so I think what was intended for convenience is used as an abuse of alternative accounts.

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...

Quite a strange coincidence, isn't it? Why is it in the Italian section, and with those accounts you exchanged merits, that so many posts were found that were written by an AI tool?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64605694#msg64605694
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64605893#msg64605893

I would say more: anyone who doubts that all the accounts found belong to one person can follow how these accounts quote other people's posts. I am sure they will find a lot of matches.
It is very easy to get merits in the Italian section, so I think what was intended for convenience is used as an abuse of alternative accounts.

I have nothing to do with those accounts, I have my credibility, I put my face on it, users who are in the top 3 in the forum know me and others who are very important know me as a person and I know that I am a very reliable guy, regarding the posts made with AI I am already paying the penalty, I will make my skills available to counter the phenomenon of the use of AI in the forum, this is all my effort that I can put into making the forum and bitcoin a place and a better resource, I really believe in the forum and I will make sure it is a better place, I recognize that I made a mistake and I will put all my effort into repairing the damage...

EDIT: we all make mistakes, you too have made mistakes in the past but you were given the opportunity to make amends, so let he who is without sin cast the first stone...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141782.0
Now, I don't understand why you're attacking me so much, if you do it to gain respect from the community or get extra merit, I don't see it as a very correct thing.
Having said that, I'll make it up to you


doing a couple of searches and tests with your tool I came to the conclusion that the translations done (which I did with chatgpt are 100% fake) which is something that should not happen given that it is only a translation and not plagiarism:

I wrote this post this morning (HAND) and analyzing it with the service https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector gives 99.7% fake which is impossible.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5511975.msg64608811#msg64608811



now, translating it into English with chatgpt:



the percentage of fakes has dropped, which seems a bit strange to me, don't you think?



I would say that the trusts that were inflicted on me are totally wrong, I repeat, I paid for the mistake even though I had specified that I only used AI tools to translate, you accused me unfairly, taking it for granted that your tools are the absolute truth, and that's not the case!

(the test also works in reverse) meaning that posts translated from Italian into English become 100% fake, so your tests are not reliable!

[Alone055]

doing a couple of searches and tests with your tool I came to the conclusion that the translations done (which I did with chatgpt are 100% fake) which is something that should not happen given that it is only a translation and not plagiarism:

I wrote this post this morning (HAND) and analyzing it with the service https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector gives 99.7% fake which is impossible.

But you already accepted your mistake here:

I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...

And here:

I have nothing to do with those accounts, I have my credibility, I put my face on it, users who are in the top 3 in the forum know me and others who are very important know me as a person and I know that I am a very reliable guy, regarding the posts made with AI I am already paying the penalty, I will make my skills available to counter the phenomenon of the use of AI in the forum, this is all my effort that I can put into making the forum and bitcoin a place and a better resource, I really believe in the forum and I will make sure it is a better place, I recognize that I made a mistake and I will put all my effort into repairing the damage...

So what's the point of trying to prove yourself right when you have already admitted it? You should have moved on and tried to prove that you have changed for others to see, and maybe you could ask for removal of your neutral tag after some time when you have improved, it wouldn't be a big deal at all.

But since you have started this, let me clear a few things for you.

I would say that the trusts that were inflicted on me are totally wrong, I repeat, I paid for the mistake even though I had specified that I only used AI tools to translate, you accused me unfairly, taking it for granted that your tools are the absolute truth, and that's not the case!

The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:

It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.

The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.

And for this one:

Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.

You have admitted it here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?

(the test also works in reverse) meaning that posts translated from Italian into English become 100% fake, so your tests are not reliable!

The test that you did to prove a point isn't proving anything because you checked the Italian text and it was detected as AI-generated but when you did the same with the translation, it didn't say it is AI-generated. So based on that fact, the posts that you were translating all this time shouldn't have been detected as AI-generated because they were in English and not in Italian.

I would also like to ask you a question. It seems that all these posts you are writing in this thread aren't translated ones but you are writing them yourself, so I can't help but wonder, if you can write this much in English, why do you need to first write your posts in Italian and then translate them to English when you can simply write them in English yourself?

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

doing a couple of searches and tests with your tool I came to the conclusion that the translations done (which I did with chatgpt are 100% fake) which is something that should not happen given that it is only a translation and not plagiarism:

I wrote this post this morning (HAND) and analyzing it with the service https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector gives 99.7% fake which is impossible.

But you already accepted your mistake here:

I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...

And here:

I have nothing to do with those accounts, I have my credibility, I put my face on it, users who are in the top 3 in the forum know me and others who are very important know me as a person and I know that I am a very reliable guy, regarding the posts made with AI I am already paying the penalty, I will make my skills available to counter the phenomenon of the use of AI in the forum, this is all my effort that I can put into making the forum and bitcoin a place and a better resource, I really believe in the forum and I will make sure it is a better place, I recognize that I made a mistake and I will put all my effort into repairing the damage...

So what's the point of trying to prove yourself right when you have already admitted it? You should have moved on and tried to prove that you have changed for others to see, and maybe you could ask for removal of your neutral tag after some time when you have improved, it wouldn't be a big deal at all.

But since you have started this, let me clear a few things for you.

I would say that the trusts that were inflicted on me are totally wrong, I repeat, I paid for the mistake even though I had specified that I only used AI tools to translate, you accused me unfairly, taking it for granted that your tools are the absolute truth, and that's not the case!

The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:

It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.

The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.

And for this one:

Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.

You have admitted it here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?

(the test also works in reverse) meaning that posts translated from Italian into English become 100% fake, so your tests are not reliable!

The test that you did to prove a point isn't proving anything because you checked the Italian text and it was detected as AI-generated but when you did the same with the translation, it didn't say it is AI-generated. So based on that fact, the posts that you were translating all this time shouldn't have been detected as AI-generated because they were in English and not in Italian.

I would also like to ask you a question. It seems that all these posts you are writing in this thread aren't translated ones but you are writing them yourself, so I can't help but wonder, if you can write this much in English, why do you need to first write your posts in Italian and then translate them to English when you can simply write them in English yourself?

the fact is this, I have never admitted that I wrote those posts with AI, it's you who are saying this, the fact that that is written is not reliable proof, I TRANSLATED those posts, so the whole story where I say that I admitted my mistakes were only due to the fact that I used AI to translate them and I was in a hurry when I copied the post because I thought what I had written was correct (if this could be an error) I take it fact, the truth is that your tools are not reliable because many of your posts are also written with ai

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333828.msg56890166#msg56890166



I'm sorry but your accounts also appear to be AI addicted.

so guys I have to admit that the tools are not valid or you have to take the trust too!

[Alone055]

the fact is this, I have never admitted that I wrote those posts with AI, it's you who are saying this, the fact that that is written is not reliable proof, I TRANSLATED those posts, so the whole story where I say that I admitted my mistakes were only due to the fact that I used AI to translate them and I was in a hurry when I copied the post because I thought what I had written was correct (if this could be an error) I take it fact, the truth is that your tools are not reliable because many of your posts are also written with ai

--
--
--

I'm sorry but your accounts also appear to be AI addicted.

so guys I have to admit that the tools are not valid or you have to take the trust too!

Okay, for the sake of the argument, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by accepting that the tools aren't working properly and they are detecting every English post as an AI-generated content. How do you explain this:

The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:

It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.

The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.

And for this one:

Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.

You have admitted it here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

the fact is this, I have never admitted that I wrote those posts with AI, it's you who are saying this, the fact that that is written is not reliable proof, I TRANSLATED those posts, so the whole story where I say that I admitted my mistakes were only due to the fact that I used AI to translate them and I was in a hurry when I copied the post because I thought what I had written was correct (if this could be an error) I take it fact, the truth is that your tools are not reliable because many of your posts are also written with ai

--
--
--

I'm sorry but your accounts also appear to be AI addicted.

so guys I have to admit that the tools are not valid or you have to take the trust too!

Okay, for the sake of the argument, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by accepting that the tools aren't working properly and they are detecting every English post as an AI-generated content. How do you explain this:

The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:

It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.

The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.

And for this one:

Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.

You have admitted it here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?

I'll tell you again that I wrote those posts personally, I translated them using chatgpt which modified the sentences by mistake, I was in a hurry and didn't check everything here... I wrote the posts myself, your tools don't work , I made the mistake of not double-checking whether chatgpt had omitted the text, unfortunately I didn't double-check the translation and the damage was done!
using AI as a translation tool is not the same as using AI to write posts, so if your analysis tools can be imperfect even artificial intelligence can go crazy, and that's what happened!
so I kindly ask you to change your position on the trusts you have unfairly stuck on me!

[Alone055]

I'll tell you again that I wrote those posts personally, I translated them using chatgpt which modified the sentences by mistake, I was in a hurry and didn't check everything here... I wrote the posts myself, your tools don't work , I made the mistake of not double-checking whether chatgpt had omitted the text, unfortunately I didn't double-check the translation and the damage was done!
using AI as a translation tool is not the same as using AI to write posts, so if your analysis tools can be imperfect even artificial intelligence can go crazy, and that's what happened!
so I kindly ask you to change your position on the trusts you have unfairly stuck on me!

Bro, you might think this way but we are not a bunch of fools who know nothing about the things we talk about. An AI model doesn't modify the sentences by mistake, if you ask it to translate a text, it only does that, it won't go ahead and add extra lines in the translation for you. I know AI is still not perfect to this day, it is being improved over time, but I know for sure that this isn't what an AI model, especially ChatGPT, would do because I do use the model myself, not for writing posts but for other purposes.

The tags you have received are rightly given and they are neutral tags, they are not red tags, so you don't need to be worried about that. You made a mistake, you admitted it, now you need to work on improving yourself as a member of this forum and prove that you have changed. Once you do that, you can request those who have left those tags to revise or remove them which is the right way to go from this point onwards. If you keep insisting and trying to prove something that isn't true, you will only get yourself in more trouble.

So I advise you to do what's right instead of enforcing something that isn't true.

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

I'll tell you again that I wrote those posts personally, I translated them using chatgpt which modified the sentences by mistake, I was in a hurry and didn't check everything here... I wrote the posts myself, your tools don't work , I made the mistake of not double-checking whether chatgpt had omitted the text, unfortunately I didn't double-check the translation and the damage was done!
using AI as a translation tool is not the same as using AI to write posts, so if your analysis tools can be imperfect even artificial intelligence can go crazy, and that's what happened!
so I kindly ask you to change your position on the trusts you have unfairly stuck on me!

Bro, you might think this way but we are not a bunch of fools who know nothing about the things we talk about. An AI model doesn't modify the sentences by mistake, if you ask it to translate a text, it only does that, it won't go ahead and add extra lines in the translation for you. I know AI is still not perfect to this day, it is being improved over time, but I know for sure that this isn't what an AI model, especially ChatGPT, would do because I do use the model myself, not for writing posts but for other purposes.

The tags you have received are rightly given and they are neutral tags, they are not red tags, so you don't need to be worried about that. You made a mistake, you admitted it, now you need to work on improving yourself as a member of this forum and prove that you have changed. Once you do that, you can request those who have left those tags to revise or remove them which is the right way to go from this point onwards. If you keep insisting and trying to prove something that isn't true, you will only get yourself in more trouble.

So I advise you to do what's right instead of enforcing something that isn't true.

I'm sorry but why don't the others reply to me anymore? why do you interfere? I, like other users, have demonstrated that your tools are totally ineffective and are not at all reliable. I am not trying to prove anything that is not the truth. You risk ruining accounts for assumptions made with the help of your tools. that prove nothing, those two users who stained the profile with these trusts, assuming that I used the AI ​​to create posts, when I tell you that I used it as a tool to translate it's not right, you don't you do it because you are interested in making the forum a cleaner place, you only do it because this way you can write other posts and be able to exchange other merits without anyone noticing, the truth is that with your tools you stain the reputation of innocent people, that being said I will also have to give a neutral trust to the other users who report so that everyone can know about the situation, I consider myself innocent for that action I committed, I used chatgpt as translation tools as I would have done with google translate, due to an oversight there it was those posts that were modified unintentionally, so I'm not guilty, the fact is that if I pay, those who make false reports to get credit will also pay, having said that I apologized and I don't deserve this treatment!

[Alone055]

I'm sorry but why don't the others reply to me anymore? why do you interfere?

It's their wish. I hope you know and understand that this is a public forum. We tend to believe in freedom of speech, so you can't ask anyone not to express their opinion or take part in a discussion whether it's an investigation, a general discussion, an accusation, or anything, as long as it is publicly available, the whole public has the right to express their opinion.

I, like other users, have demonstrated that your tools are totally ineffective and are not at all reliable. I am not trying to prove anything that is not the truth. You risk ruining accounts for assumptions made with the help of your tools. that prove nothing,

I have already told you a couple of times. Even if you are right and the tools don't work, which is not how it actually is, your posts contain sentences that are only found in texts that are "generated" by AI and not "translated".

those two users who stained the profile with these trusts, assuming that I used the AI ​​to create posts, when I tell you that I used it as a tool to translate it's not right, you don't you do it because you are interested in making the forum a cleaner place, you only do it because this way you can write other posts and be able to exchange other merits without anyone noticing,

You are not telling the truth, that's why. If you could actually prove that you didn't do it, maybe you could have those tags removed. Facts are against you, and you keep repeating the same things instead of addressing the facts that I keep asking you to explain.

the truth is that with your tools you stain the reputation of innocent people, that being said I will also have to give a neutral trust to the other users who report so that everyone can know about the situation, I consider myself innocent for that action I committed, I used chatgpt as translation tools as I would have done with google translate, due to an oversight there it was those posts that were modified unintentionally, so I'm not guilty, the fact is that if I pay, those who make false reports to get credit will also pay, having said that I apologized and I don't deserve this treatment!

You can do whatever you want, it's a free forum and you have the right to express your opinion, now it depends on others whether they find your opinion reasonable or not.

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

I'm sorry but why don't the others reply to me anymore? why do you interfere?

It's their wish. I hope you know and understand that this is a public forum. We tend to believe in freedom of speech, so you can't ask anyone not to express their opinion or take part in a discussion whether it's an investigation, a general discussion, an accusation, or anything, as long as it is publicly available, the whole public has the right to express their opinion.

I, like other users, have demonstrated that your tools are totally ineffective and are not at all reliable. I am not trying to prove anything that is not the truth. You risk ruining accounts for assumptions made with the help of your tools. that prove nothing,

I have already told you a couple of times. Even if you are right and the tools don't work, which is not how it actually is, your posts contain sentences that are only found in texts that are "generated" by AI and not "translated".

those two users who stained the profile with these trusts, assuming that I used the AI ​​to create posts, when I tell you that I used it as a tool to translate it's not right, you don't you do it because you are interested in making the forum a cleaner place, you only do it because this way you can write other posts and be able to exchange other merits without anyone noticing,

You are not telling the truth, that's why. If you could actually prove that you didn't do it, maybe you could have those tags removed. Facts are against you, and you keep repeating the same things instead of addressing the facts that I keep asking you to explain.

the truth is that with your tools you stain the reputation of innocent people, that being said I will also have to give a neutral trust to the other users who report so that everyone can know about the situation, I consider myself innocent for that action I committed, I used chatgpt as translation tools as I would have done with google translate, due to an oversight there it was those posts that were modified unintentionally, so I'm not guilty, the fact is that if I pay, those who make false reports to get credit will also pay, having said that I apologized and I don't deserve this treatment!

You can do whatever you want, it's a free forum and you have the right to express your opinion, now it depends on others whether they find your opinion reasonable or not.

I translated my post several times this is the result....

as you can see from this photo, I managed to recreate the error and apparently the AI ​​was wrong:



you can say what you want but being tools like the ones you use they can make mistakes or not be correct!

when I speak, I speak with full knowledge of the facts, these tools can MAKE WRONG!

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

AI-generated post

User: Sg4j1n3ll0

ChatGPT:

It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.

(archive)

please remove your trust that you placed as @lovesmayfamilis did, I and other users have demonstrated that the tools are imperfect and can do a lot of damage to accounts if not used sparingly, so please remove your trust and try to be reasonable...

[morvillz7z]

please remove your trust that you placed as @lovesmayfamilis did, I and other users have demonstrated that the tools are imperfect and can do a lot of damage to accounts if not used sparingly, so please remove your trust and try to be reasonable...

This will be my first and last reply here. I stand by my tag and will not remove it. I am 100% certain that you have been using AI to generate (not translate) the majority of your posts on the Gambling board since September 16th of this year.

If you don't want my tag to appear under default trust, please start a thread in "Reputation" and state your case. Ask people to distrust me, you need roughly 10/15/20 "~". I promise i won't get mad at anyone who thinks i've abused my power.

I don't need tools to determine whether a text is AI-generated or not. It's fucking obvious. You can never get rid of that metallic taste of language that is so redundant, overly generalizing, and frequently lacking a personal touch...a text only AI can produce.


You went from this (posts and style that also reflect/match the activity on your local board):

juric will replace de rossi but it has to be a very quick and quick thing because the substitute has to manage a good team that is not managing to play well in the championship and de rossi knew how to convey a lot so the substitute has an important job to do for me I've never liked him but let's see what he can do, he also has a certain Dybala on his side so...

he made a good change and rightly so, it couldn't have been done better than this other than changing the team and revolutionizing everything including the coach, so the club has decided to hire a winning coach who is proving to be up to the task at least for now , and I must say that I really like how he is behaving so yes Juvenrtus is going in the right direction

in fact now that there is a lot in command of the team we are seeing that all the redundant players who come to take too much money are leaving and it is more than normal when you have a competent coach like him, for Allegri he had his fixations and chose players also based on luck in my opinion now the wind has changed and all this money is no longer spent!

to this absolute dogshit crap:

You are absolutely correct that unpredictability is a common feature in football and on any given week, a smaller team might defeat a large team and disrupt betting predictions. However, current form, mindset, and home advantage often play significant roles in determining the outcome of a match, which is why I agree with your predictions.

The victory of A.C. Milan over Inter Milan has indeed given the team a confidence boost that they will likely carry into their match against Lecce. On the other hand, Inter Milan will probably do their best to bounce back by beating Udinese and closing the gap with their rivals.

As you've mentioned, Napoli and AS Roma undoubtedly want to keep their momentum going this season. It seems that both teams have found a rhythm with their new coaches that they are eager to maintain. However, we can only wait and see how these matches will actually play out.

You make a valid point regarding AC Milan and their recent performances. Their inconsistency in the Italian League and UCL, paired with their troubling defeat against Liverpool can indeed impact the mentality of their players. Leverkusen's triumph against Feyenoord has likely boosted their confidence significantly, crucial heading into a fixture with a team of AC Milan's caliber.
Considering Milan's subpar performance in the UCL last season, Leverkusen may have this advantage. However, football is an unpredictable sport and with proper adjustments, Milan has the potential to put a lot on the line for Leverkusen. A lot rides on how both teams will come out on the field and manage the game. But indeed, the home ground advantage can play an integral part for Leverkusen.

It's indeed unfortunate to see a team like Brazil, that used to dominate the field with its glorious play, is now struggling to maintain the standards. A change in management, a competent coach like Abel Ferreira, who has already displayed his prowess by bagging several titles, could indeed bring a directional change for the team. Yet, it's not just about the coach but the collective team performance which makes the real difference. The heart of every player makes the team; missing it clearly shows in their performance. It's high time that they pull themselves together and learn from their mistakes because facing other South American opponents isn't going to be a walk in the park. Their agility and readiness to pounce on any opportunity is really commendable and a learning lesson for the Brazilian side. They need to revamp their strategies and approach swiftly before it's too late.

You make a fair point about the difference in working routine at a club versus at a national team. It's true that Tite has spent many years coaching the Brazilian national team, which could potentially make him more prepared for the demands of the national team than someone who has only worked at a club level. Your argument about his poor performance at the club not meaning certain failure at a national level is plausible.

But there are also valid concerns raised by the previous poster. Even if we accept that Tite could perform better than he did at his club if given the opportunity to return to the national team, there is no guarantee of this. His recent failure may signal that he is not currently in his optimal form and could translate to a poor performance at the national level too.

You suggested the possibility of hiring a high-level European coach. That's an interesting idea - however, bringing in someone unfamiliar with the culture and style of football in Brazil could also pose its own risks. Likewise, it may not be

Your insight is quite interesting. Indeed, the underdog teams should never be underestimated. Como's examples of beating stronger teams like Atalanta and Verona demonstrate that with determination and good strategy, smaller teams can also prevail in unexpected circumstances.

The upcoming match against Napoli will indeed be a tough one for Como considering Napoli's strong performance this season under Conte. However, given Como's recent track record, we cannot rule out a possible surprise. Regardless, as you mentioned, the fact that they have shown the determination and the will to stay in the Serie A is commendable.

One thing to note is that in football, anything can happen on match day. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how Como prepares for this match and how they plan to challenge the comparatively stronger team of Napoli. They might surprise us once again.

and my favorite one, that level of verbose not even a native speaker can reach:

people's perspectives on the condition of a country largely depend on their individual circumstances and requirements. Sure, American politics has its share of problems, but so does every other country. The fact that the United States remains an attractive destination for many, despite its issues, signifies the relative privilege and opportunities it continues to provide.

Comparative advantages or disadvantages notwithstanding, it's essential for the citizenry not to be complacent and continue striving for improvements and changes that promote the greater good, rather than solely focusing on selfish interests. Greed certainly plays a part in politics, but so does the capacity for empathy, ideals of justice, and the strive for a better society. It's a balance that needs to be carefully struck and maintained.