Here it is! The perfect scaling solution! Segwit SF followed by 2mb HF.

[25hashcoin]

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014399.html


We need the Segwit softfork 1st. Then we increase blocksize. This is it. This is the end and the beginning right here.

[1715502102]

1715502102

[1715502102]

1715502102

[franky1]

before you sniff more glue.
do you understand the cludge of doing it soft. and then the decludge to undo the soft to finally go hard.

do you understand the tech, the code. all the math manipulation

or are you just reading reddit and following the most +1 comment you can find

[Minecache]

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014399.html


We need the Segwit softfork 1st. Then we increase blocksize. This is it. This is the end and the beginning right here.

BTC at new ATH.

[Viscount]

Now only POW can save bitcoin if UASF fails, since last solid miners backed down 

[BillyBobZorton]

Doing segwith as a hard fork will KEEP THE COVERT ASICBOOST SCAM RUNNING. This is the only reason why Jihad is pushing to do it with hardfork.

Via softfork, the covert ASICBOOST scam dies forever.

The game theory is clear. Don't let any paid shill confuse you. If they don't do it as a softfork this is a fucking scam, specially if they are stupid enough to ignore 95%+ of the network (Core software) and instead hire some idiots to do the code and then ask people to run that node. What a mess.

If this gets done, it must be SF segwit first, and as an official Core release. Everything else will just keep making UASF go higher.