minerjones (OP)
Mantis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 3596
|
|
May 28, 2017, 11:44:47 PM Last edit: January 28, 2021, 05:34:20 PM by minerjones |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Hox
|
|
May 28, 2017, 11:49:48 PM Last edit: May 29, 2017, 12:06:47 AM by Hox |
|
Very cool, I'd love set #23.
edit: wait maybe I want set #22 (which includes coin#23??)
|
|
|
|
digicoinuser
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1072
|
|
May 28, 2017, 11:57:24 PM |
|
Thanks Hox, This project was a long time in the works and we're glad to release it today.
|
|
|
|
teeGUMES
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1253
Merit: 1203
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:07:58 AM |
|
I'll take set 6
|
|
|
|
Hox
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:08:55 AM |
|
I'm a bit confused with the numbering, the set # and the coin #'s are different?
The # printed with the public key is the coin# not set#? If so I would like set #22.
|
|
|
|
wheelz1200
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 1406
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:11:47 AM |
|
I want a set how does this work? Hox if you dont want set #23 i will take it
|
|
|
|
|
digicoinuser
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1072
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:14:36 AM |
|
I'm a bit confused with the numbering, the set # and the coin #'s are different?
The # printed with the public key is the coin# not set#? If so I would like set #22.
No problem and yes, the numbering is a little different than usual since set #1 contains coin #2, #35, & #68. Coin #1 is standalone and is not included in one of the 3-Coin sets. The table that MJ has provided shows the numbering for the 3 sets of 33 coins which make up the last 99/100 of the Ravenbit Podified Series. If you have any further questions please feel free to ask away!
|
|
|
|
teeGUMES
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1253
Merit: 1203
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:19:13 AM |
|
Hey MJ I love the hologram but it does look a lot like the honeycomb pattern of a peeled Cas coin. Is there a distinct difference when peeled.
|
|
|
|
buckrogers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2728
Merit: 1181
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:21:10 AM |
|
set # 2 please.
thanks!
|
Well I'm dr. spock I'm here to rock y'all
|
|
|
radiocoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2017, 12:38:16 AM |
|
i would like to get a single coin the copper would be preferable
|
|
|
|
JUPITYR
Member
Offline
Activity: 464
Merit: 74
|
|
May 29, 2017, 01:26:36 AM |
|
Put me down for a single bronze coin please. If there is a #77, I'd take that. Otherwise, the number is not that big a deal.
|
|
|
|
Lutpin
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
|
|
May 29, 2017, 01:29:43 AM Last edit: May 29, 2017, 01:55:39 AM by Lutpin |
|
Gimme set #3
Sorry i didnt know coin #23 wasnt in set #23
Trying to steal Deffy's numbers? Negs incoming!
|
| | | | ███████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ | | | |
▄████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ██ ██████ ▄██████████▄ ████████████████████▀ ██ ████████ ▄████▀ ▀████▄ ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ████ ████ ████▀ ▀██▀ ████ ██ ████ ████ ▄███▀ ████ ██ ████ ████ ███▀ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ████ ████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ████ ████ ███▄ ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ████████████████████ ▀████ ████ ██ ██████████████████████ ▀████▄ ▄██▄ ████ ██ ████ ████ ▀████▄ ▄████▀ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ████ ████ ▀██████████▀ ████████████████████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀ | | |
|
|
|
wheelz1200
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 1406
|
|
May 29, 2017, 01:31:57 AM |
|
Sorry i didnt know coin #23 wasnt in set #23 give me the lowest set available, sorry for being a pita
|
|
|
|
elianite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1377
Merit: 1134
The Cryptonumist
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:00:29 AM |
|
#94 bronze please!
|
New book: BLOCKLAND: 21 Stories of Bitcoin, Blockchain, and Cryptocurrency www.cryptonumist.com/blocklandAuthor of Encyclopedia of Physical Bitcoins and Crypto-Currencies. View a free sample and Buy the book at https://cryptonumist.comTo prevent hacks, DO NOT send me BTC above $300 value before first emailing coins@cryptonumist.com to confirm. Beware of scammers on Telegram/Instagram etc.
|
|
|
greenplastic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1809
Merit: 1136
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:21:16 AM |
|
Congrats on this Cryptopods morph/creation!
#8 Coin Set, w/4 3D Logos (1 of each color)
PM sent. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
BandanaPanda
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 1
|
|
May 29, 2017, 03:03:03 AM |
|
I'm sorry if this sounds dumb but what do you mean by "Pod-ify"?
|
|
|
|
BandanaPanda
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 1
|
|
May 29, 2017, 03:25:15 AM |
|
Ok, now I've got it. Thank you
|
|
|
|
digicoinuser
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1072
|
|
May 29, 2017, 03:30:27 AM |
|
I'm sorry if this sounds dumb but what do you mean by "Pod-ify"?
Not a dumb question at all, I don't believe it was mentioned anywhere with a full explanation. For our first series Ravenbit coins were "Podified"/"Pod-ify" where we: 1. removed the original hologram from the coin 2. destroyed the original public/private key labels 3. finally replaced the public/private key labels with our own generated keys and replaced the hologram with our own "sticker" As MJ mentioned, we "Pod-ify" the coin when we assemble it ourselves using our branding and securely generated keys. The #1 Satoshi coin was DIY and didn't require the original hologram removed, although we believe destroying an already created coin is not required for "Podification".
|
|
|
|
Hox
|
|
May 29, 2017, 03:45:23 AM |
|
2. destroyed the original public/private key labels
Damn, I would have been interested in buying these. Any chance you tested these private keys before you destroyed them? I don't know if anyone has ever peeled any of the Ravenbit assembled coins and actually proved the private keys match the public.
|
|
|
|
|