http://www.uasfpool.comHistory repeats. So called users show they want do rather the miners business and fall back to pool -> centralization with all its problems giving up their user's power to the single pool operator?
1. It's well known that UASF needs
some miner support, otherwise it would end up being impractical.
2. This doesn't mean that there would be "pool centralisation", because anyone could move over to another pool which allows them to mine for UASF (e.g. Slushpool).
WTF should be better with this than that what we have now?
This is a small pool. If there were 50 pools like Kanopool, Bitcoin would not be centralised, and this is many times smaller than that to the extent that it's basically irrelevant.
Is it all about greed and power and divide and conquer?
No. You can't just decide to not have any pools considering that there's only a block every ~10 minutes. This pool is not greedy - yet.