STOP PARENTAL CONTROLLING, COCK-BLOCKING AND NITPICKING NEW MEMBERS

[DevDevine69]

Seriously...
Just cause someone is new, doesn't mean they are a scammer, spammer or incompetent idiot.
Mind your business and stop white knighting just to be relevant. Thanks

[1714965787]

1714965787

[1714965787]

1714965787

[Panda Trump]

Seriously...
Just cause someone is new, doesn't mean they are a scammer, spammer or incompetent idiot.
Mind your business and stop white knighting just to be relevant. Thanks

I see you got negative feedback because you didn't want to use escrow? That paired with you being new is quite a giant chance on you being a scammer... He only wanted to warn others.

If you aren't a scammer, why wouldn't you want to use escrow?

[DevDevine69]

Actually I never didn't want to use escrow. I never even engaged in a transaction.
I actually advocated the use of escrow and wouldn't transact without it.
Unfortunately, some members are basically trolling with irrelevant and incorrect feedback and comments...
Which is why I posted this.

Now, because some white knight snitch fag wanted to think he was coming to the rescue, I have
"Warning: trade with extreme caution" next to my name so I have to create another account.

I'm going to fuck with his trust now...

[Panda Trump]

Actually I never didn't want to use escrow. I never even engaged in a transaction.
I actually advocated the use of escrow and wouldn't transact without it.
Unfortunately, some members are basically trolling with irrelevant and incorrect feedback and comments...
Which is why I posted this.

Now, because some white knight snitch fag wanted to think he was coming to the rescue, I have
"Warning: trade with extreme caution" next to my name so I have to create another account.

I'm going to fuck with his trust now...

Yeah I've seen this crap too... The problem is that you're not giving him trusted feedback, so he won't have the "trade with extreme caution" under his name 

[hilariousandco]

Lol. How old are you, 12? You were trying to sell raffle tickets using autobuy links. Sure, you're legit. You're just annoyed that you're not going to be able to scam people now.

[actmyname]

Actually I never didn't want to use escrow. I never even engaged in a transaction.
I actually advocated the use of escrow and wouldn't transact without it.
Unfortunately, some members are basically trolling with irrelevant and incorrect feedback and comments...
Which is why I posted this.

Now, because some white knight snitch fag wanted to think he was coming to the rescue, I have
"Warning: trade with extreme caution" next to my name so I have to create another account.

I'm going to fuck with his trust now...

Nice to see that you're now redirecting people who click on the reference to this random site:

Code:

http://www.mynetspendcard.com/?uref=4888759037

DO NOT OPEN

But at least your feedback comments are pretty relevant... to yourself.

"Guy has no life. Just sits on this website creating fake irrelevant feedback [...] because he's convinced himself he's actually doing something meaningful."

[Pearls Before Swine]

OP, you're throwing an internet temper tantrum.  Hilariousandco saw in you what we see all the time here, which is newbies trying to do deals that look scammy.  And yes, people on this forum are quick to give negative trust and for good reason.  New accounts seeking to do deals with Paypal, no escrow, trying to rush things, etc., are usually by scammers, of which there are more than you can count.  So your best bet is to appeal to hilarious to remove the feedback after some time, or create a new account and just be a member of the community and learn its rules.

[Quickseller]

Lol. How old are you, 12? You were trying to sell raffle tickets using autobuy links. Sure, you're legit. You're just annoyed that you're not going to be able to scam people now.

I am not disagreeing with the rating in this case (I actually agree that it is appropriate), however do you think you could use reference links and a slightly greater level of detail in the negative ratings that you leave?

Doing so will make it a lot easier to evaluate if the person is actually a scammer, and to evaluate if you are in the wrong or not when these types of threads pop up.

[Lauda]

Mind your business and stop white knighting just to be relevant. Thanks

You join someone else's forum, and then you tell the people assigned by them to mind their own business. Do you even realize the absurdity of this? By:
1) Posting this ridicuous thread.
2) Spamming hilariousandco with false retaliatory ratings.

You have proven his claim to be true. I have also added you a negative rating.
Side note: People do really dig their own holes with these threads.

[awesome31312]

OP may be a scammer, but he has a point. Let's not turn Bitcointalk into one those forums where anybody who has an unpopular opinion gets group attacked by white knights. By white knights, I am of course talking about the people who rushed to this post to defend the moderators, simply because they were moderators. This happens because on a subconscious level, these users want to identify with the "people in charge". Just look up Milgram's experiment to understand what I'm talking about. We want to expand and encourage discussion here, not suppress it. Not pointing fingers at anybody, just telling you guys to chill out. It's just a website.

Also, this thread is coming off like a complaint about the forum [meta], rather than reputation related.

[Lauda]

By white knights, I am of course talking about the people who rushed to this post to defend the moderators, simply because they were moderators.

There were 5 people who posted here besides hilariousandco:
Panda Trump
actmyname
Pearls Before Swine
Quickseller
Lauda

What you are claiming does not seem to be the case with any of these people. Are you sure that you aren't just writing nonsense because of that Yobbit signature? The rating on OP is well deserved; case closed.

We want to expand and encourage discussion here, not suppress it. Not pointing fingers at anybody, just telling you guys to chill out. It's just a website.

Yes, by spamming the shit out of genuine members with commentary bullshit where 99% of the posts are spam.

[awesome31312]

u sure that you aren't just writing nonsense because of that Yobbit signature? The rating on OP is well deserved; case closed.

Nobody argued against whether or not the rating on the OP is well deserved. Your cliche, shrewd, dismissive Ad Hominem wording that refers to my participation in a signature campaign, while simultaneously attempting to use that point to try and somehow claim that it makes my post any less valid will not have the intended effect on me, because it is not only irrelevant, but overdone.

Additionally, of the list of people that you cited, it does not matter who the people are, they rushed and defended the moderators, when in fact, nobody here except for the moderators and the OP themselves would be able to discuss this issue. They have context on the issue, we do not. Therefore, to be favoring one guy over the other would clearly be taking sides. Let's be objective here.
)

PS: You writing "Case closed" means that we have concluded this, I will not be responding to any posts you make regarding this matter.

[Lauda]

Your cliche, shrewd, dismissive Ad Hominem..

This has nothing to do with ad hominem. Don't use things that are above the scope of your capabilities.

Additionally, of the list of people that you cited, it does not matter who the people are, they rushed and defended the moderators, when in fact, nobody here except for the moderators and the OP themselves would be able to discuss this issue.

Bullshit. I have no intent to defend hilariousandco. If anything I am going to strongly criticize him due to various issues.

They have context on the issue, we do not.

I don't need context for this case; this thread is enough. OP has clearly proven himself to not be trustworthy based upon the actions that followed

Let's be objective here.

Sure; go back to spamming posting (albeit somewhere else) for the scam exchange.

[Spoetnik]

I find this funny the complainer is accusing a FEMALE of white knighting and Cock Blocking.  

Hey NOOBS guess what ?

You do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
And that is simply because of the context of the situation.
There is a reason there is 1 million + accounts here.
Scammers hammer this place hard 24/7.

We *SHOULD* assume noobs are scammers FIRST !

It's up to you noob showing up to be on your best behavior and prove us wrong.
Not the other way around.

PM'ing people sketchy hidden ponzi links & shit ?
Uhh no.. i don't think so sketchy as broken English scammers.
If it was up to me i'd do far more than neg your dumb fucking ass's.

You noob idiots out there are predators.. plain & simple.
So go fuck yourself whiny fucking bitches.  

[Patatas]

OP may be a scammer, but he has a point. Let's not turn Bitcointalk into one those forums where anybody who has an unpopular opinion gets group attacked by white knights.

lol did you buy that hero member account ? If not,you wouldn't be saying bullshit in the first place.Secondly,I'never come across a plausible condition where any newbie is attacked by a group of people.Mostly,no one gives a shit about newbies.

By white knights, I am of course talking about the people who rushed to this post to defend the moderators, simply because they were moderators. This happens because on a subconscious level, these users want to identify with the "people in charge".

We get it,you've read a page or two about psychology and bitcointalk is where you're spewing out the irrelevant stuff.

PS. : I'm not defending any moderators.

[JeromeTash]

----

There is nothing like paranoia here. Those Legendary members you accuse of not minding their business have seen almost all types of scammers and suspicious users, so they try to put warnings. If you are someone legitimate, then prove that you are legitimate, and you will be trusted.

If you don't like scammers being pointed out, then there is something wrong with you. You might as well look for forums where scammers are free to post anything without any intervention.