hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
 |
June 05, 2017, 05:25:42 PM |
|
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mchu168
|
|
June 05, 2017, 05:37:20 PM |
|
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't. No, I did not send it because he opened a scam accusation. I was PM'ing him before that saying I was on my way home, but he opened one anyways. If you noticed, I didn't send it instantly after he opened the accusation either. Please do not be like the OP here and jump to crazy conclusions like these. I am not a PayPal scammer, if I am, prove it? My account is not hacked, if it is, prove it? There are absolutely no red flags. You are jumping a long way into these conclusions. I can call a trusted exchanger such as "sardasa" a PayPal scammer because he is able to chargeback at a later date. I can call a random member "hacked" and leave him a negative trust until he signs a message. But is that what anyone in their right mind does? Absolutely not. It's completely unfair to call me any names without a single piece of evidence. I am honestly shocked to see a member like myself have orange trust, it really is shocking that someone so respectable would do such a thing. |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
June 05, 2017, 05:40:13 PM |
|
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
|
mchu168
|
|
June 05, 2017, 05:43:41 PM |
|
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
This is a complete joke. I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence?  Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user. |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
June 05, 2017, 05:48:14 PM |
|
This is a complete joke. I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence? Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user. You are playing on the presumption of innocence, but this isn't a court of law. In cases like these, the burden of proof is on the accused and not the accuser (although the opposing situation is also not uncommon). You can open countless threads, but that won't help you [1]. Without the proof that you're the original owner of this account, you are only going to dig your own hole.
[1] - There are over a dozen threads about me, and zero in which the accusers have made a valid case. Good luck.  |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
June 05, 2017, 07:39:35 PM |
|
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
This is a complete joke. I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence? Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user. There's quite enough evidence against you to arouse suspicion. The fact that you haven't posted since 2015 and then come back trying to do trades straight away and can't prove the account is yours is good enough for the feedback as a warning. If you can prove otherwise then people will remove the feedback but it really doesn't look good for you. You have an address posted here: Hope this helps! If this works for you, I would gladly accept a belated Christmas present from you.  1vYG6NVr9nGqqyRL78jQXKLHqPcVX5NKS Can you sign a message from it? |
|
|
|
|
mchu168
|
|
June 05, 2017, 08:55:23 PM |
|
I am almost 100% positive that this account is compromised. Unless proven otherwise, I will not be removing my rating (regardless of the validity of this accusation). Do not PM me again unless you have conclusive proof of being the same user as the one in 2014.
This is a complete joke. I will be opening a thread shortly. How can you be almost 100% positive, with absolutely zero evidence? Lauda, corrupting the user-base like a poison, user by user. There's quite enough evidence against you to arouse suspicion. The fact that you haven't posted since 2015 and then come back trying to do trades straight away and can't prove the account is yours is good enough for the feedback as a warning. If you can prove otherwise then people will remove the feedback but it really doesn't look good for you. You have an address posted here: Hope this helps! If this works for you, I would gladly accept a belated Christmas present from you. 1vYG6NVr9nGqqyRL78jQXKLHqPcVX5NKS Can you sign a message from it? That address is not a part of my wallet it must have been a single-off deposit address for a website |
|
|
|
|
|
warningsigns
|
|
June 05, 2017, 10:16:04 PM |
|
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't. No, I did not send it because he opened a scam accusation. I was PM'ing him before that saying I was on my way home, but he opened one anyways. If you noticed, I didn't send it instantly after he opened the accusation either. Please do not be like the OP here and jump to crazy conclusions like these. I am not a PayPal scammer, if I am, prove it? My account is not hacked, if it is, prove it? There are absolutely no red flags. You are jumping a long way into these conclusions. I can call a trusted exchanger such as "sardasa" a PayPal scammer because he is able to chargeback at a later date. I can call a random member "hacked" and leave him a negative trust until he signs a message. But is that what anyone in their right mind does? Absolutely not. It's completely unfair to call me any names without a single piece of evidence. I am honestly shocked to see a member like myself have orange trust, it really is shocking that someone so respectable would do such a thing. Sign that freaking message or another red tag from me. |
|
|
|
|
mchu168
|
|
June 05, 2017, 10:23:43 PM |
|
I was sent the 0.2 Bitcoin first, without escrow. What kind of scammer would send the PayPal, when they have already received the BTC? I returned 0.5 BTC to a user after a trade failed to go through as well, and these amounts are among the smaller amounts I've been trusted with.
One that is wanting to scam more via the same methods or do a chargeback at a later date which you have plenty of time to initiate. You also only sent it after he opened a scam accusation against you. There's enough red flags here for me to warrant the negative feedback but I'll happily remove it if you can provide reasonable proof that this is your account, but it looks to me like it very likely isn't. No, I did not send it because he opened a scam accusation. I was PM'ing him before that saying I was on my way home, but he opened one anyways. If you noticed, I didn't send it instantly after he opened the accusation either. Please do not be like the OP here and jump to crazy conclusions like these. I am not a PayPal scammer, if I am, prove it? My account is not hacked, if it is, prove it? There are absolutely no red flags. You are jumping a long way into these conclusions. I can call a trusted exchanger such as "sardasa" a PayPal scammer because he is able to chargeback at a later date. I can call a random member "hacked" and leave him a negative trust until he signs a message. But is that what anyone in their right mind does? Absolutely not. It's completely unfair to call me any names without a single piece of evidence. I am honestly shocked to see a member like myself have orange trust, it really is shocking that someone so respectable would do such a thing. Sign that freaking message or another red tag from me. Your red tag means nothing, you come on here every day to give red tags that do nothing. Wonder why you're trying to police the forum when you don't get paid, or even give insightful comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
