Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 03:40:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-06-07] Will Bitcoin ETF Ever Be Accepted by US Regulators?  (Read 3109 times)
elite3000 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1073
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 08, 2017, 02:10:28 PM
 #1

One of the biggest questions most Bitcoin enthusiasts would have about the cryptocurrency is whether or not Bitcoin exchange traded funds will be regulated by the US or other authorities abroad.

While Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have already gained a lot of attraction from investors all over the world, many institutions such as government agencies, banks and other entities have yet to accept the digital currency.

According to Ryan Radloff, head of investor relations at XBT Provider, it is really just a stalemate between banks and regulators, wherein banks will only start accepting the cryptocurrencies when the regulators do. Though this is the case for most countries, there are several countries such as Sweden whose Nasdaq has already included cryptocurrencies in their public exchange.

Bitcoin status in the US

Bitcoin’s status and classification as per the US regulators have still not been decided as of yet. The SEC has not made any comment in classifying Bitcoin yet and it seems like it will not happen anytime soon.

The SEC has already rejected two entities that aim to provide Bitcoin ETFs to potential investors. From the legal side, it seems as though Bitcoin is not doing very well due to this hurdle.

According to Radloff, it doesn’t look like Bitcoin will be accepted anytime soon following the two rejections that the SEC made, though this may all change in the future if the SEC becomes convinced by the cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin in other countries

Although the US is very stern with their decision on the Bitcoin issue, there are other countries that seem to be more open to the cryptocurrency. Other countries such as Sweden, Switzerland, Japan and Italy have accepted Bitcoin in their public exchange and already have regulations regarding it. Radloff also stated that in the future, he is expecting more countries to accept cryptocurrencies.

Notably, there are exchange-traded Bitcoin products in Europe, but they aren't ETFs, they are exchange-traded notes, which are similar to ETFs but carry different risks. However, European investors and regulators are more accustomed to ETNs, said Radloff.

The COINXBE and COINXBT ETNs are listed on the Nasdaq Nordic. Another ETN-style Bitcoin product was recently delisted from the Gibraltar Stock Exchange.

Nick Cowan, managing director of the latter exchange, said he's expecting two similar Bitcoin products to be listed soon, as well as a third based on a basket of several cryptocurrencies.

Convincing the US

While the market is still relatively new, it has already gotten a lot of attention from investors who have drawn a lot of data from it. However, the only problem would be the government regulations and licenses. A report by the University of Cambridge’s Center for Alternative Finance stated that 46 percent of exchanges are not government regulated. This means that the other 54 percent are not operating with licenses.

While it may be difficult to convince US regulators to accept the digital currency, it is still possible as the US is looking for transparency and stability before they consider allowing it. The reason is that it involves a lot of money and it is quite a risk on their end.

Nevertheless, it would seem as though the US will not be one of the next countries to accept the cryptocurrency. However, it will only be a matter of time before this event happens. When the US sees a lot of other countries doing it, they will most likely join in the fray.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/will-bitcoin-etf-ever-be-accepted-by-us-regulators
1715614813
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715614813

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715614813
Reply with quote  #2

1715614813
Report to moderator
1715614813
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715614813

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715614813
Reply with quote  #2

1715614813
Report to moderator
1715614813
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715614813

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715614813
Reply with quote  #2

1715614813
Report to moderator
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715614813
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715614813

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715614813
Reply with quote  #2

1715614813
Report to moderator
1715614813
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715614813

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715614813
Reply with quote  #2

1715614813
Report to moderator
1Referee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427


View Profile
June 08, 2017, 03:00:47 PM
 #2

If the SEC remains holding on to Bitcoin's unregulated market nature, which was the main reason they rejected both ETF's, nothing will change in the coming years. The SX ETF had a proper insurance policy set up, that would protect the ETF holdings up to $125M, but even that wasn't enough. Regarding the SEC review, it's taking unnecessarily long to be honest - not sure if that's a positive or negative sign, but I find it somewhat suspicious.
Kemarit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1353



View Profile
June 08, 2017, 04:31:00 PM
 #3

If the SEC remains holding on to Bitcoin's unregulated market nature, which was the main reason they rejected both ETF's, nothing will change in the coming years. The SX ETF had a proper insurance policy set up, that would protect the ETF holdings up to $125M, but even that wasn't enough. Regarding the SEC review, it's taking unnecessarily long to be honest - not sure if that's a positive or negative sign, but I find it somewhat suspicious.

Exactly. I don't think the SEC will approved any bitcoin ETF for that matter. The price of bitcoin is so volatile and SEC jurisdiction is to protect the investors. How can they protect them from bitcoin price if their is a swing here and there. So for me, its more likely to reject the second review. And as far as the long review, for me it just points out that a rejection is imminent. I think we just have to live without any Coin ETF. I want it to be regulated but I'm 100% that it will not.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
June 08, 2017, 06:30:46 PM
 #4

come back in a decade and maybe it'll be different. but we can see by the performance of gbtc how hungry people are for stuff like this.

what's the deal with investing in foreign created vehicles?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!