Is this State important to uncovering Satoshi

[andrei56]

Satoshi is global, because we are all Satoshi now.   .... The hunt for Satoshi should stop, because there is nothing to be gained to identify him

or her or them.   Yes, you would solve a mystery, but you will be the villain in the story. Bitcoin fanatics will hunt you down and kick the shit

out of you, if something happens to the real Satoshi. { arrested, murdered, abducted assaulted ....} Bad things might happen to Satoshi, once

his real identity is revealed.  

Those that are hunting satoshi do so in an effort to become famous themselves, they say that the one that finds satoshi will win a Pulitzer and to be honest I think they are right, so this is not about solving a mystery or anything like that this is about money and fame.

[Seansky]

Those that are hunting satoshi do so in an effort to become famous themselves, they say that the one that fins satoshi will win a Pulitzer and to be honest I think they are right, so this is not about solving a mystery or anything like that this is about money and fame.

If that's the case they are better off not finding satoshi at all because if all had known his/her/they're real identity, it will not just remove his/her/they're privacy but also it will put the real satoshi to harm's way. They don't care about satoshi though so I think it's better off if satoshi will be anonymous forever, the important thing for me is that he brought bitcoin to us, a crypto currency to use on online transactions and a way to pay others online.

[squatz1]

Satoshi is a satoshi that will probably continue to be a mystery in bitcoin
I do not think it is necessary to disclose...

Well you do have to give it to some people on this forum, curiosity is going to get the best of you on something like this which is so mysterious to the point that we HAVE ZERO information about the person that wrote all the code to this wonderful thing that's now turned into a Multi-BILLION dollar currency. Not saying it's gotten tons of people to accept it like Satoshi probably wanted, but we've gone ways since the creation of Bitcoin with innovation from people who accept Bitcoin and such.

Though, just leave Satoshi be and let him live his life. He'll always be keeping tabs on all of us though, so we do know that at least.

[khufuking]

What would finding Satoshi or one of his friends achieve for our Bitcoin community? Absolutely nothing. The identity of satoshi is irrelevant.

He obviously no longer wants to be a part of the project and prefers his privacy, I guess people just refuse to understand this.

Hmm I really doubt that is true about the part (he is no longer wants to be part of the project ) . On the other hand hi is definitely want to stay

anonymous . I think staying anonymous is not just good for him but for the whole project too .

[andrei56]

Those that are hunting satoshi do so in an effort to become famous themselves, they say that the one that fins satoshi will win a Pulitzer and to be honest I think they are right, so this is not about solving a mystery or anything like that this is about money and fame.

If that's the case they are better off not finding satoshi at all because if all had known his/her/they're real identity, it will not just remove his/her/they're privacy but also it will put the real satoshi to harm's way. They don't care about satoshi though so I think it's better off if satoshi will be anonymous forever, the important thing for me is that he brought bitcoin to us, a crypto currency to use on online transactions and a way to pay others online.

That is what I think as well, since they do not care about the well being of satoshi and the possible consequences in his life like the lose of anonymity and even penal charges, but I think satoshi did a good enough job at hiding from anyone that may try to find him.

[DOGE12321]

From where did Nebraska come from? How did you conclude he lives in Nebraska? Even I could say any state in America, but it doesn't prove that Satoshi Nakamoto resides there. You have no evidence.

Look at this logically. An unknown genius came up with the philosophy of decentralisation, created an entire currency's code, stuffed into the hand of the early developers and went off the scene. He or she hasn't come back for nearly a decade, even after Bitcoin's recent price hype. I think that says something. Maybe we shouldn't focus on finding Nakamoto's identity, but rather on the further development of Bitcoin.