First of all, thank you for giving the theory a good read.
Let me get this straight... Your plan is to take "all the assets of Wall Street and half the tax revenues of U.S social service programs", and redistribute them among... Let's see, 22 million tokens, and you're giving 1,000 to each participant...
There is no reason or intention for the distribution to be equal. In fact, the first person to respond received 100,000 coins. I would expect the last person to respond near the end game would be lucky to receive a small fraction of one coin. Those who act at the beginning obviously need more incentive than those who act at the very end.
You want to take $25,000,000,000,000 from "all the assets of Wall Street and half the tax revenues of U.S social service programs" - and give it to 22,000 people? That's your idea of heaven on earth? Thank goodness it's impossible, otherwise you might bring about the apocalypse. You claim to want to free the country from "unholy institutions", but the cement of this plan just looks like it wants to increase the number of billionaires in the United States from 565 to 22,000.
And you still want to make this transaction, and mandate it with a constitutional amendment that you plan to pass using a "decentralized political power" with 22,000 participants, which is completely impossible. Step 1 of any constitutional amendment - 2/3 majority in the house of representatives. The representative from the least populated congressional district in the entire country was elected with 130,000 votes. So, even if all users of this coin lived in that district, they would not be able to elect a single congressman to say yes to your amendment. And since it is such a ridiculous amendment, it will most likely not get any yes votes, unless some high-up politician wants to destroy their career.
With some receiving less than even one coin, there is no limiting factor resulting from the number of coins. Your recitation of part of the U.S. Constitution is true but your idea that it takes votes to pass legislation is very wrong. The U.S is a republic, not a democracy. Consider the term Whip as in Majority Whip or Minority Whip. The idea is that the Whip drives lawmakers to vote for legislation in the same way that a cowboy drives a herd of cattle. What does this have to do with voters? The answer to that question has much more to do with how the Itsunholy coin will work than your voter based theory of passing legislation.
But let's say, somehow, you get the amendment ratified. Now, the 6,000 or so listings that make up "Wall Street" must be dissolved, and all their assets seized. The 401ks, IRAs, investments, and employers of millions of people just got wiped out, completely gone. Many ISPs and water companies shut down, disconnecting the world and making cities more like Flint in terms of drinking water. The economy enters a depression unlike any other because all of the money is gone. People will probably rise up against the government, which no longer has enough money to do anything about it. The US dollar is no longer considered to be of any value - the credibility of the currency was just completely ruined. And the new elite you created won't be able to protect their non-monetary assets, so they will be broke in a few months when the masses finish raiding them. So all the wealth in the country was redistributed, not just the wealth of Wall Street. Lots of people will probably die over a combined lack of insurance, materials, equipment, and labor. Heaven on earth.
I think that this would be a good plot for a science fiction book. But right now, you are just injecting people with false hopes. Maybe this is a scam, though I don't see how you could possibly gain from this. The system as it is now has no value or potential whatsoever, even to a scammer.
The hard assets will all still exist, they'll just be under new ownership. As to your reference to intangible assets, there are many financial experts who would argue that your world of 401ks, IRA etc are just a Ponzi scheme that will not survive much longer anyway. When these fail they'll be seen as a tool for the super rich to steal from everybody else.
You act as if it would be the end of the world if we had to trade using crypto instead of the dollar. We'll be fine. You're selling the genius of humanity short. Just like there will be replacements to the dollar, probably much superior, there will be superior solutions with your other issues as well. Mankind will be much smarter. The world is like a big brain and each of us is a brain cell. The use of violence to control communication is like hitting the world brain in the head with a hammer. By definition, the use of violence to control communication interferes with communication between the "brain cells." For example, can you imagine how much smarter America would be if the main stream media was wiped off the map?
As for your references to the new elite, I figure the number of coin holders needed with way more cushion than I should need to pass the constitutional amendment is two million, that's my goal, not 22,000. Certainly some of the two million would be a new elite but who cares as long as society is greatly improved. You talk as if the world's productive capacity is fixed and it's all about how we divvy up the pie. I would say the real issue is who owns and controls the pie making. If the right people own it, the world will have plenty of pie.
Finally, in light of your thoughtful analysis I'm surprised you cannot see how I can get rich from this? A one in million shot at $25 trillion is worth $25 million, at least that's how much any smart poker player would pay. According to my projection of needing two million people, two coinholders bring me to that one millionth of the way there point. Two hundred coinholders brings me 1/10000 of the way there. That's makes the expected value of the coin horde $2.5 billion.
The really cool thing about his is if you're a U.S. resident, you can receive coins (the current airdrop is at $500 million) at zero risk with ten minutes of effort arranging delivery. Don't get me wrong, I love discussing this but the theory of unholiness could take years for you to sort out. How the coin can force political action is more boring detail than the average reader can bare. In the meantime the airdrop shrinks in size. What are you afraid of? Grab your coins now and figure the rest out later when they're trading on an exchange and you have a pile of money in exchange for ten minutes and you're looking at the potential of millions more. I'm confident this all will be much easier and fun to digest then.
