Jamalaezaz, worst campaign manager ever

[ParmaBTC]

me and Parma we would like to get our  translating bounty  soon

this is Jamal

[1715127967]

1715127967

[1715127967]

1715127967

[1715127967]

1715127967

[1715127967]

1715127967

[BitcoinMarshal]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair

[zahra4577]

I was also the participant of OneGram and I have also not got payment but I think Jamal has done his job and any delay in payment is because of Onegram team.There were 3 managers and they made it clear in op itself that there is no escrow for funds.Unfortunatly here is no one from OneGram team to clesrify things

[jamalaezaz]

me and Parma we would like to get our  translating bounty  soon

this is Jamal

I've stated that countless time that whenever someone reply to me he must quote my previous message. I am getting hundred of messages at a day and I can't remember previous messages.

Anyway. Devide sent me a message "Italian Translation" and I replied "No thanks" I thought he's asking for a translation job on another project I am managing.. that was a misunderstanding happened because he didn't quoted my previous reply..

Anyway . I've just replied him and clarified the issue.. I was not the one who paid TaaS bounties and you knew that from the day one..

[ankit10]

me and Parma we would like to get our  translating bounty  soon

this is Jamal

hahahaha you should mention the topic

[Mpamaegbu]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay, onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

The way this is going, it's already putting a stain on the image of Onegram as an Islamic coin whether the fault is from Jamal or from the company. Whichever way, I guess that caveat on the first page of the Onegram campaign of not using an escrow is a pointer to what is happening now. None of them from that company wanted to take responsibility from the beginning if things went wrong as it is now. Jamal should have had the funds escrowed or held them himself just the way Yahoo does. So, Jamal should share in the blame. It's partly his fault.

[ParmaBTC]

me and Parma we would like to get our  translating bounty  soon

this is Jamal

I've stated that countless time that whenever someone reply to me he must quote my previous message. I am getting hundred of messages at a day and I can't remember previous messages.

Anyway. Devide sent me a message "Italian Translation" and I replied "No thanks" I thought he's asking for a translation job on another project I am managing.. that was a misunderstanding happened because he didn't quoted my previous reply..

Anyway . I've just replied him and clarified the issue.. I was not the one who paid TaaS bounties and you knew that from the day one..

davide was asking for bounty payment, wich one? italian translation, he knows very well who Davide is and wich ANN he translated. he done the same when we created a telegram chat wit him and dimitri (taas).
Jamal is an impostor , he made some traps and cheats. he done very bad work with taas . when issue solved you'll know how

[sweetdesirez]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

The way this is going, it's already putting a stain on the image of Onegram as an Islamic coin whether the fault is from Jamal or from the company. Whichever way, I guess that caveat on the first page of the Onegram campaign of not using an escrow is a pointer to what is happening now. None of them from that company wanted to take responsibility from the beginning if things went wrong as it is now. Jamal should have had the funds escrowed or held them himself just the way Yahoo does. So, Jamal should share in the blame. It's partly his fault.

I can't understand what Islam has to do with this onegram coin. The coin has nothing to do with Islam or nor is it Islamic in any way, they claimed the coin is Sharia compliant, which many muslims will differ too. Just by someone claiming something to be sharia compliant does not make it Islamic in any way  
Tomorrow if I slap someone in the name of the president of America, will the president be blamed for it or I am the cunt   to be held responsible?

[mattermaster]

I guess you (OP) is one of OneGram's participants? You didn't get any payment until now and you using new account to criticize him?
Oh well, you joined in a risky campaign without any escrow

Declaimer:, There is no Escrow in this Program.
Bounty managers have no control of any kind of funds and payments. all bounties will be paid directly From Project leads/core team. so bounty manager's should not be called responsible for any payment and funds.

There are 2 other managers besides jamal, what happened with them?

They turned off. Only I am here trying to fix things and listening users blaming me ...

So, what actually are you trying to clarify?  Has onegram refused to pay you for your campaign observation?
These recurr verbalizing questions should be plainly answered so that campaign participants would omit blaming you.

[ParmaBTC]

Guys do  you know jamal ?
NO? neither i, im SURE i don't! i never worked with him i none one of my Bitcointalk project !!!
but he claims the contrary

but the layer, cheater and robbery says something that he can't prove

MY BEST FRIEND?          




Do you know TAAS TEAM who is your "trusted"  campaign manager?  

This is only the beginning of the trap, stay tuned other coming

[DaMut]

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

[Al Pacino Jr]

Jamal run with 25k of monaco bounty.

25% will be used for other bounties & contests.

[bitcoinvestor]

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. "
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same

[jamalaezaz]

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. "
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same

Already answered this in Monaco thread:

there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.

only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and  BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)

[bitcoinvestor]

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. "
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same

Already answered this in Monaco thread:

there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.

only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and  BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)

If you say that your strategy is the best, Why there always crowd at the end of the campaign, many participants complaining. My article also rejected at the end of the payment date. You make participants waiting. At the beginning of the first week you can reject or disqualify participants. I just give suggestion. I don't follow any campaign of your managing anymore but I feel dissapointed seeing your act. If you reject at the first week so the participants will stop campaigning, no problem after that. I know your strategy to make more participants but don't want to pay more.

[malcovixeffect]

Sigh..
A lot of problem happened,and he's really a trouble maker.
His campaign always ended with questionable ending,
And the participants always rejected for unknown reason,even thought they accepted them in the first and second week.
After that he'll reject them.
And lack of comunication with other team member,make it even worst.
Corruption? It might be

Old strategy of him " Reject participants at the end of campaign. "
Thatis is his best strategy with delay payment.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1924985.1540 this is monaco card problem

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905333.580 onegram case the same

Already answered this in Monaco thread:

there is no reason to reject someone from start.
I accept users from beginning because I think they may follow the rules.. if someone follow the rules there is no chance for him to get rejected. for other who don't care about rules they deserve to get disqualified.

only 43 users out of 250+ disqualified. and anyone can see why I've rejected them and  BTW I am still open to listen those who think they disqualified by mistake or with wrong reason (already changed 3 user's status from rejected to accepted)

If you say that your strategy is the best, Why there always crowd at the end of the campaign, many participants complaining. My article also rejected at the end of the payment date. You make participants waiting. At the beginning of the first week you can reject or disqualify participants. I just give suggestion. I don't follow any campaign of your managing anymore but I feel dissapointed seeing your act. If you reject at the first week so the participants will stop campaigning, no problem after that. I know your strategy to make more participants but don't want to pay more.

Probably he gets your bounty. Its likely that is his strategy to confuse people and gets to ran-off with your tokens.

[wajik-tempe]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair

I agree with this Statement
i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing 
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations

[fudster]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair

I agree with this Statement
i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing 
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations

Why don't you ask Jamal for proof of having a multiple accounts, if he has proven you have multiple account would you take back the responses you made here? The guys is just working for the team, if the team hasn't given you the bounties you can always ask the dev if they have already paid jamal. The way I see it is that Jamal can't give you the bounties unless the dev team already sent the payment to him.

[wajik-tempe]

Does it mean onegram team don't pay or jama not pay.If onegram not pay , onegram will make the name of islam bad but if jamal not pay I will never join the campaign managed by him.

I already decide this I will never join any campaign which is managed by Jamal because he is really one of worst person here managing campaigns and rejecting members at the end of campaign its never been fair

I agree with this Statement
i was rejected at the end of the campaign by accusing me of multiple accounts without any evidence and clarity,really disappointing 
if you Mr. Jamalz accused me for that reason .i want to ask for proof that I am a multi account with his allegations

Why don't you ask Jamal for proof of having a multiple accounts, if he has proven you have multiple account would you take back the responses you made here? The guys is just working for the team, if the team hasn't given you the bounties you can always ask the dev if they have already paid jamal. The way I see it is that Jamal can't give you the bounties unless the dev team already sent the payment to him.

This is just misunderstanding and wrong checking by Mr. Jamalz
He has given me an explanation of this misunderstanding,so i am quite satisfied with the answer. Jamalz

[bitcoinvestor]

Jamal and suporters always accused participanst using multiple accounts. That's the way they answer. I delete my red trust to jamal because he in the end paid the bounty reward. But the fact the payment is lower than the stated in the ann. It's OK It is just lesson to bounty participants. You see that  monaco and onegram show the end of crowd bounty WHy? Why? That's  the same manager, the same case. He is not scammer but he is unfair. If he sees that some participants using multiple account just easy to mark red at the first week. No problem after that. isn't it.