The democrats believed to be too big to jail... will see.

[Masha Sha]

From shaddy dealing with the clinton presidency (gmos) to more recents total abuse and exploitation, i think that they believed to have become to big to jail. Now they start to realize that their little swamp can so quickly be drained that all along they have been played (from lynch airport girl, to holder gun runner, to obama healthcare pimp, to bill clinton rape rampage with his buddies). I don't see the problem to liquidate those assets now. The question is which superframe agenda were they serving? I can't believe that planners could be as stupid to believe to have a single chance of world gov... noise to loot to be exposed to permit the constitutionnalists return in glory? Like a vaccination? Inserting dangerous agents to test in real life the solidity of the consitution?

Test passed.

What will happen to the demcrat basis? Have they started to realize that the rumors on the internet are mostly true? Pelosi cash? Gold mine in haiti? Clinton slush fund, clinton foreign secretary pay to play, hillary server/email etc etc etc... or do they still prefer to stay in their foetal position?

[GreenBits]

From shaddy dealing with the clinton presidency (gmos) to more recents total abuse and exploitation, i think that they believed to have become to big to jail. Now they start to realize that their little swamp can so quickly be drained that all along they have been played (from lynch airport girl, to holder gun runner, to obama healthcare pimp, to bill clinton rape rampage with his buddies). I don't see the problem to liquidate those assets now. The question is which superframe agenda were they serving? I can't believe that planners could be as stupid to believe to have a single chance of world gov... noise to loot to be exposed to permit the constitutionnalists return in glory? Like a vaccination? Inserting dangerous agents to test in real life the solidity of the consitution?

Test passed.

What will happen to the demcrat basis? Have they started to realize that the rumors on the internet are mostly true? Pelosi cash? Gold mine in haiti? Clinton slush fund, clinton foreign secretary pay to play, hillary server/email etc etc etc... or do they still prefer to stay in their foetal position?

Let's define a contemporary Democrats, shall we?

Today, the House Democratic caucus is composed mostly of progressives and centrists,[4] with a smaller minority of conservative Democrats. The party's philosophy of modern liberalism advocates social and economic equality, along with the welfare state.[13] It seeks to provide government intervention and regulation in the economy.[14] These interventions, such as the introduction of social programs, support for labor unions, affordable college tuitions, moves toward universal health care and equal opportunity, consumer protection, and environmental protection form the core of the party's economic policy.[13][15] The party has united with smaller liberal regional parties throughout the country, such as the Farmer–Labor Party in Minnesota and the Nonpartisan League in North Dakota.

What's not part of being a Democrat?:
Caring about Hillary Clinton

For some reason, the right seems to conflate Hillary with the entirety of the DNC. I'm tired of hearing about her, she lost. I never talk about the team that loses the Superbowl, Im too geeked about the other team winning. Essentially, we usually forget the losers and celebrate the winners, but some reason, Clinton is still a talking point half a year into the Presidency she lost . I'm sooo glad she lost, we wouldn't have gotten Trump. What allowing Trump to become POTUS has done is expose what the GOP has drifted to, in the interest of its corporate sponsors:

The Republican Party's current ideology is American conservatism, which contrasts with the Democrats' more progressive platform (also called modern liberalism). Further, its platform involves support for free market capitalism, free enterprise, fiscal conservatism,[3] a strong national defense, deregulation, and restrictions on labor unions. In addition to advocating for conservative economic policies, the Republican Party is socially conservative, and seeks to uphold traditional values based largely on Judeo-Christian ethics.[1]

I have no issue with these ideologies, as presented, even if I don't agree with them. Im personally all for free markets and deregulation, always love a strong national defense. The quirk comes when you see how these noble pursuits have been perverted by corporate lobbying (it's a D and R thing, tbh).

Supports deregulation, but at the expense of worker and environmental safety.

Supports free market capitalism, but restricts state's rights to sell marijuana.

Fiscal conservatism, but has routinely sought tax breaks for corporations and the elite.

Supports the idea of trickle down economics, but this strategy was implemented and proven ineffective.

Definition: Trickle-down economics is a theory that says benefits for the wealthy trickle down to everyone else. These benefits are usually tax cuts on businesses, high-income earners, capital gains and dividends.

So the guys that would outsource jobs out of the country, even establish headquarters outside of the States to avoid taxes, they are suddenly going to make sure that the value they collect 'trickles down to the little guy' the worker.

I won't hold my breath. The shareholders are the first consideration. It's the law, dammit

Another observation is that it is not really fair to push Christian agendas through government. I'm Christian myself, but everyone isn't. No taxation without representation; and Church and State really shouldn't mix. The mixture of church and state gets you regimes that incept things like Al Queada and ISIS. I don't think I have to explain that additionally.

Jesus said render on to Caesar his shit. Even in the Republic that was Rome, people knew to separate Politics and faith.

We have forgotten our fathers faces

So the critique isn't with the party as much as the agenda. The mission of your party is noble, but your voting base is being used to support policies that harm the very base that votes for it, as well as others.

So, what's your actual critique of Democratic ideology, or are you mad at Hillary, a candidate that didn't win, or Obama, a man who is no longer President? His legacy is being erased as we speak by your party it's the new goal post Obama; dismantle his works. Tax repeal, healthcare repeal, and environmental regulatory repeal because we all want corporations to get tax breaks, less healthcare, and a more fucked up environment.

Yuge.

[Masha Sha]

Dear GreenBits,

Your post is awesome! I can't agree more with you. I think your summary is very accurate.

Your critic of the so called republican is very accurate. It's no wonder that all their stars got roasted by trump!

And your view of the dnc is precise however i think the hillary and bill gang was able to use those agendas to hide their crimes, dealing, wealth and power accumulation. They knew that what they were doing was totally unsustainable starting with their worldgov under the united nations charter ruling over the us constitution making the usa a vassal of the united nations to healthcare they knew (you can keep...) was unmanageable but perfect to provide a smoke screen to their real deeds.

The core problem is that democrats are failed europeans! They don't get the problems of collectivized imposed by laws and forces of their policy, or rather they don't like the idea of the wonder than decentralized market incentivized decision can produce...

The problem is that beyond searching if the democrats policy are normatively positive, where does the money come from? Stealing from peter to pay paul isn't sustainable either. It's so easy to sell dream, all markets know that, but when the customer or in this case voter open his purchase or tax paid thing it's impossible to hide from him... health premium, tuition from schools, public school results etc.

And please i don't support any party, but the constitutionalists libertarian conservative one. By libertarian freedom is restricted by the start of another man freedom, consent, unhinged flaw of data, the adapted take over of the market share of the weak etc, constitutionalist because it's still among the best compromize to date, and conservative in the sense that don't change what works, make it leanier and eventually efficienter or rephrazed: your life do what ever you want with it as long as you don't hurt anyone (for all issues).

As much as your post is awesome please read all the christian early texts, from the new testament to those of unapproved sources: in short it's only by loving the others and yourself by admitting your weakness that in the might of god you may live illustrates by the christ and his victorious confrontation toward sin and doubt. You can't compare christianity with any other religion but eastern ones. But it has nothing to do with those vicious democrats... they all want a big mcmansion paid by the tax payers, and if not they will loot it!

[joebrook]

Dear GreenBits,

Your post is awesome! I can't agree more with you. I think your summary is very accurate.

Your critic of the so called republican is very accurate. It's no wonder that all their stars got roasted by trump!

And your view of the dnc is precise however i think the hillary and bill gang was able to use those agendas to hide their crimes, dealing, wealth and power accumulation. They knew that what they were doing was totally unsustainable starting with their worldgov under the united nations charter ruling over the us constitution making the usa a vassal of the united nations to healthcare they knew (you can keep...) was unmanageable but perfect to provide a smoke screen to their real deeds.

The core problem is that democrats are failed europeans! They don't get the problems of collectivized imposed by laws and forces of their policy, or rather they don't like the idea of the wonder than decentralized market incentivized decision can produce...

The problem is that beyond searching if the democrats policy are normatively positive, where does the money come from? Stealing from peter to pay paul isn't sustainable either. It's so easy to sell dream, all markets know that, but when the customer or in this case voter open his purchase or tax paid thing it's impossible to hide from him... health premium, tuition from schools, public school results etc.

And please i don't support any party, but the constitutionalists libertarian conservative one. By libertarian freedom is restricted by the start of another man freedom, consent, unhinged flaw of data, the adapted take over of the market share of the weak etc, constitutionalist because it's still among the best compromize to date, and conservative in the sense that don't change what works, make it leanier and eventually efficienter or rephrazed: your life do what ever you want with it as long as you don't hurt anyone (for all issues).

As much as your post is awesome please read all the christian early texts, from the new testament to those of unapproved sources: in short it's only by loving the others and yourself by admitting your weakness that in the might of god you may live illustrates by the christ and his victorious confrontation toward sin and doubt. You can't compare christianity with any other religion but eastern ones. But it has nothing to do with those vicious democrats... they all want a big mcmansion paid by the tax payers, and if not they will loot it!

I do agree with Greenbits as well, on paper the principles of the Democrat Party is the best, they are all for the people, giving them the freedom that they desire but since the Clinton administration, all they seem to care about is making money on the backs of the common people. Trump is not a good person but am sure glad he won the election rather Hilary who is crooked in every possible way, I never trusted her, she is a serial liar.

[GreenBits]

Thank you, Masha and Joe, I appreciate you guys hearing me out. To be fair, the Dems are just as complicit with corporate/elite pandering, honestly it's worse, given they are supposed to represent the people. The Clintons are no angels, I will be clear. I just think they are financially corrupt (Bill is a horndog), but not like, sex dungeon corrupt. I don't blame rich people for being greedy assholes, I expect it LOL. But I will concede, and y'all need to quote this, Hillary Clinton was a poor candidate, acted dishonestly concerning the election (they cheated Bernie bad, and it should have been illegal), and is a perfect example of the fiscal corruption I was talking about.

If I could, Id buy y'all a beer

[Sithara007]

I'm sooo glad she lost, we wouldn't have gotten Trump. What allowing Trump to become POTUS has done is expose what the GOP has drifted to, in the interest of its corporate sponsors

Trump has performed well so far. He is the only American president till now, to reduce the federal debt by a massive $100 billion+. The Dow Jones is at historical highs, and the economy is cruising along. I really doubt whether the economy would have performed this well under Hillary.