...

[ekiro]

...

[cellard]

What happens after SegWit2x?

The most likely outcome is nothing will happen. We will get segwit, and there will be no agreement to do a hardfork. If anyone tries to hardfork, their end will crash in price, because they have the inferior code, and the whales (except Roger Ver) do not approve of the hardfork.

So, in the rare occasion of the hardfork actually happening, do not sell your legacy coins for the hardfork coins, or you may lose it all.

[ranreichman]

It's sort of a game of chicken. Many people say that there will be a hard fork but the miners have a lot to lose if they hard fork and people don't go with it. I actually think it's likely that there will be two Bitcoins and that the more decentralized one will win.

[Minecache]

What happens after SegWit2x?

We all have Lambo's on order.

We can dream.

[aeternus]

What happens after SegWit2x?

The miners want to do a hard fork after they activate segwit, however the way they are signaling segwit is different than the one devised by the devs, so I do not know if it is going to be recognized as if segwit got activated.

[BossMacko]

After SegWit2x People who uses Bitcoin will be divided by 2, Bitcoin price will surely decrease for a while, it will take some time to get back again because people will have to choose like in ETH, eth or eth Classic.

[hajimasan]

What happens after SegWit2x?

According to my knowledge segwit2x is upgraded version with the improved technology of the segwit old version ( that is using by us currently ) .
According to my local news I know that in segwut2x , there will be two chain that will handle two coins network ( one is Bitcoin and another is BTU ) .
And also they will increase the size of the block of the blockchain so that we need to pay low fee to confirm the same transaction that we are doing with high fee .
And with this new launching we will find better response of the network to handle our Bitcoin and new gift of the BTU coin and will have the better option to invest money in new coin like BTC ( that was useless in the starting ) so may be in this time we can buy this new coin and then hold it for long time to make profit like the Bitcoin have .

[Carlton Banks]

It's sort of a game of chicken. Many people say that there will be a hard fork but the miners have a lot to lose if they hard fork and people don't go with it. I actually think it's likely that there will be two Bitcoins and that the more decentralized one will win.

+1

And it's unlikely to be the 2x fork. Segwit2x is just the 5th (or 6th?) attempt at big business trying to take control of Bitcoin's source code, it started with Bitcoin XT 2 years ago, and there have been umpteen attempts since then.

And it always involves a hardfork so that the Bitcoin codebase becomes controlled by the people proposing the fork. Bitcoin will continue with the actually talented and innovative programmers it has now, one way or another.

If it means we must do our own hardfork to evade malicious miner action against the Bitcoin Core chain, then so be it. Come with it you cowards.

[Amph]

It's sort of a game of chicken. Many people say that there will be a hard fork but the miners have a lot to lose if they hard fork and people don't go with it. I actually think it's likely that there will be two Bitcoins and that the more decentralized one will win.

there can't be 2 bitcoin fork, there will be always one that will prevail over the other, and other will be considered an altcoin immediately

if segwit2x will not continue with the hard fork of 2mb, then wasn't just better to do the standard segwit? i can't see the point of the 2mb, if none agree to HF

[DoublerHunter]

After the segwit2x, the network or the blocks in the network will become bigger in terms of size so the blocks are capable of having more transactions which will give more space for the network so i think the transactions will become faster and the fees will be lower a little bit and it will be a great news for most of the bitcoin users and there might be a pump after the segwit2x.

[anylic]

This is good news for those who hold btc when there are two strings. If you're keeping btc you will have two strings are "148 BTC" and "Legacy BTC" after splitting. Besides, there will be several other scenarios will occur risky

[ethereumhunter]

i think after segwit, the price of crypto currency will be increase or maybe it will make correction price before the up price. and for bitcoin, after segwit, the correction will be waiting for us and i hope we don't get panic to see this because after correction, the price is moving to go up. just waiting and enjoy the party 

[mindrust]

There are also some suspicions that Segwit2x is just another distraction to prevent UASF happening or at least cut off its possible future support. There is a possibility that we may never ever get segwit2x. They may delay segwit2x to the last second and leave UASF with little support on Aug1 and they may change their minds about it afterwards.

That's not a small possibility considering that Jihan's/Roger's real thoughts on segwit.

That's just another game from bitmain.

[minime]

There are also some suspicions that Segwit2x is just another distraction to prevent UASF happening or at least cut off its possible future support. There is a possibility that we may never ever get segwit2x. They may delay segwit2x to the last second and leave UASF with little support on Aug1 and they may change their minds about it afterwards.

That's not a small possibility considering that Jihan's/Roger's real thoughts on segwit.

That's just another game from bitmain.

btc destroyed by those who profit most
taht would be funny

[Iranus]

There are also some suspicions that Segwit2x is just another distraction to prevent UASF happening or at least cut off its possible future support.

Suspicion?  It's 100% obvious that it's trying to diminish UASF's support.  The whole point is to get it activated before UASF becomes too popular.  There's no way anything would have happened this month if it wasn't for UASF being a threat.

There is a possibility that we may never ever get segwit2x. They may delay segwit2x to the last second and leave UASF with little support on Aug1 and they may change their minds about it afterwards.

That's not a small possibility considering that Jihan's/Roger's real thoughts on segwit.

Honestly, I see that as unlikely.  Looks more like a conspiracy theory than anything particularly intelligent - after that there would just be the threat of a different UASF a bit later instead.

[Casdinyard]

After the segwit2x, the network or the blocks in the network will become bigger in terms of size so the blocks are capable of having more transactions which will give more space for the network so i think the transactions will become faster and the fees will be lower a little bit and it will be a great news for most of the bitcoin users and there might be a pump after the segwit2x.

Yeah hope the activation will be successful. If this will be a success there will be a larger block chain for faster transaction. And like what you'd said. The splitting of the block chain is the only thing I don't like about. This will just bring confusions to many. But still these are all speculations, many things will happen after the activation but hope these are for the better bitcoin community.

[itot]

Bitcoin will do whatever the survey outcome is.
Bitcoin is not a natural phenomena that only
follows the laws of physics , it is exactly what
users wish it to be. If people decide it has value
it will have value.

[cpfreeplz]

It's sort of a game of chicken. Many people say that there will be a hard fork but the miners have a lot to lose if they hard fork and people don't go with it. I actually think it's likely that there will be two Bitcoins and that the more decentralized one will win.

there can't be 2 bitcoin fork, there will be always one that will prevail over the other, and other will be considered an altcoin immediately

if segwit2x will not continue with the hard fork of 2mb, then wasn't just better to do the standard segwit? i can't see the point of the 2mb, if none agree to HF

Well that's just not true. One will obviously do better than the other but that doesn't mean the other will necessarily completely fail. It could be like eth classic and eth where one is worth a hell of a lot more than the other, but the other still has some followers for whatever reason.

[DoublerHunter]

It's sort of a game of chicken. Many people say that there will be a hard fork but the miners have a lot to lose if they hard fork and people don't go with it. I actually think it's likely that there will be two Bitcoins and that the more decentralized one will win.

there can't be 2 bitcoin fork, there will be always one that will prevail over the other, and other will be considered an altcoin immediately

if segwit2x will not continue with the hard fork of 2mb, then wasn't just better to do the standard segwit? i can't see the point of the 2mb, if none agree to HF

Well that's just not true. One will obviously do better than the other but that doesn't mean the other will necessarily completely fail. It could be like eth classic and eth where one is worth a hell of a lot more than the other, but the other still has some followers for whatever reason.

Yeah bitcoin will just have like ethereum classic which is called bitcoin unlimited and it will have followers for sure because it will be generated by the asian people who will support and split from the chain. I think the segwit2x is a completely good action for bitcoin because the chain will split into two and the network will be decreased on its possible users so the transactions will become faster.

[TomUyamot]

After the segwit, a stronger bitcoin will surface. There is no hardfork happening. I think the people behind bitcoin will not even approve of it. Softfork is likely. It will not cause a serious shake for me. Instead, a sort of a development or improvement will be installed. After the segwit come August 1, the price of bitcoin will soar high.