Is Matonis (W)right ? Analyse this Video and build your Settled View

[hv_]

https://youtu.be/YAcOnvOVquo

i had to see this twice now but i take a 3 rd view for sure.


2:22 Starts

I see a settled Matonis

I see a nervous Wright

He s getting in rage about scaling and governance

He shows lots of insight and data ( will be distributed by Matonis) from the beginning and code pieces and annekdotes.

Smart contracts, B2B, 0 conf tx,...

He will offer some solutios and let the market decide to choose.

He will run a pool to enforce his solutions.

He answers QA and gives a hint why Satoshi Nakamoto is 'Japanese' and Nakamoto was taken from a Japanese Economist who tried colluding with the Western world.

http://ajaigaur.weebly.com/uploads/6/7/3/7/6737815/delios_gaur__makino_jms_2008.pdf
P.  11 = 179 ??

Finally i can only say these guys know a lot and want to make bitcoin great again.recommendet!

I personally can distinguish beween emotion and calculus. So i m happy to see what comes next and I like to see a proper human discussion from my bitcoin community down here. Take a stepp back, whatch the video 2 times and post analytcally...

Cheers

Edit: I also beleive, if bitcoin should succeed, we have to think big and invite all big to join. Who wants to stay nichy?

[Troller Durden]

I have watched it 3 times now.

The angry man is still making sense.

[eaLiTy]

Jon Matonis already verified his stance that Craig Wright is Satoshi ,this is the blog he wrote confirming how he could provide the proof that is needed, unless he could prove the doubts of the entire world by signing and proving who he really is,no one will believe his claims. I am always impressed with CW about his knowledge and all of his visions , but all of his rants are targeted at Maxwell .

If I was not that stupid as I normally are, I wd know how I could help....

Age is not a hurdle to learn new things,you can still learn things if that interests you.

[hv_]

Jon Matonis already verified his stance that Craig Wright is Satoshi ,this is the blog he wrote confirming how he could provide the proof that is needed, unless he could prove the doubts of the entire world by signing and proving who he really is,no one will believe his claims. I am always impressed with CW about his knowledge and all of his visions , but all of his rants are targeted at Maxwell .

Actuall, I really don't care about personal stuff and cults if or not he is Satoshi and how he proof and to whom. This might be all very human and erratic.


I rather care if anyone acts like Satoshi and wants to rule by markets and solution. I m exited to see things coming up here and make bitcoin BIG. 

If I was not that stupid as I normally are, I wd know how I could help....

 

[Kprawn]

CW answered the question himself, HE does not want to have a single authority to be in charge. We should also hope that he is not Satoshi, because

we do not need a single authority to be the figure head of this technology. You know what happens with figure heads? It gets chopped off by the people

who wants to harm Bitcoin. Do you really want someone like CW to be that authority figure? Piss off 

[thejaytiesto]

https://youtu.be/YAcOnvOVquo

i had to see this twice now but i take a 3 rd view for sure.


2:22 Starts

I see a settled Matonis

I see a nervous Wright

He s getting in rage about scaling and governance

He shows lots of insight and data ( will be distributed by Matonis) from the beginning and code pieces and annekdotes.

Smart contracts, B2B, 0 conf tx,...

He will offer some solutios and let the market decide to choose.

He will run a pool to enforce his solutions.

He answers QA and gives a hint why Satoshi Nakamoto is 'Japanese' and Nakamoto was taken from a Japanese Economist who tried colluding with the Western world.

http://ajaigaur.weebly.com/uploads/6/7/3/7/6737815/delios_gaur__makino_jms_2008.pdf
P.  11 = 179 ??

Finally i can only say these guys know a lot and want to make bitcoin great again.recommendet!

I personally can distinguish beween emotion and calculus. So i m happy to see what comes next and I like to see a proper human discussion from my bitcoin community down here. Take a stepp back, whatch the video 2 times and post analytcally...

Cheers

Edit: I also beleive, if bitcoin should succeed, we have to think big and invite all big to join. Who wants to stay nichy?

I did already analyze Craig Wright's presentation here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1996746.msg19883337#msg19883337

His claims are inconsistent in my book. Something doesn't add up. Oh and the way he gets mad at a guy asking if he will dump his coins to crash the legacy chain price if there is a hardfork seems like a clear sign of he not having access to these coins, even tho he makes it seem as if he is just mad about asking about a private financial issue, but if you look closer he is just mad because if he doesn't move the coins in a hardfork it's another proof that he isn't satoshi.

[hv_]

It s clear to me and he said it. He does not want to be the King, so if he really was Satoshi, he needs to destroy anything there ( in our minds) .

No matter what, if he deliver, I m fine. I m bitcoin maximalist longer than most other here and wanted bitcoin big from my earliest contact. And there was never a person cult, just feature ( security first) and adoption. Go for on chain scaling, thats most secure and needs to be maximalized!!!

All other efforts ARE weakening bitcoin, get it or loose.

[Traxo]

https://pastebin.com/TGiFMZ03

updated: https://pastebin.com/ayVc6bNq

[European Central Bank]

he hasn't delivered shit. he hasn't proven shit.

everyone knows what he has to do. he hasn't done it.

he ain't worth anyone's time. can anyone point to one single piece of code?