EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner with DevFee disabled

[cryptonix13]

Version of EWBF's zec-miner without developer's fee.

Thread which used to mine for developer's fee now works on your shares, so,
you can notice 'Accepted share' message with wrong share counter in program's output. That's fine.

Address for donations t1PD6bM1L7A3MdDJHvsmKwaD2a96vpRxS6P

Win64: https://mega.nz/#!Q34kQLyb!vekU930d5k6wYgMUYjyhPJtdpQR6kp1mZae0IhncRmg
Linux 64: https://mega.nz/#!4iIClQ4D!tbff8HgrT5Pii8yMDXf9eZd5yFSrwOALHnjsaW7NlWU

[od1n]

You can choose the fee yourself with EWBF. Adding --fee 0.0 to the command line does the same.

[cryptonix13]

No. Even with --fee 0.0 it still spends about 5% of time mining on developer's pool. You can check them by 'DevFee' string in the log.

[od1n]

Ah, ok. Thanks a lot for this info.

[ioglnx]

There is no DevFee string if you set --fee 0 it still works as he implemented it in 0.3.3b ..and leave him his devfee.

[cryptonix13]

In my linux/windows miners, 0.3.4b version has 'DevFee Accepted/Rejected share' message even with "--fee 0" argument passed.

Code analysis says the same. That's the part of windows version which processes --fee option. When it set to 0, variable gets assigned to some non-zero value, which influence program's behavior later:
 https://ibb.co/fVoJja

[ioglnx]

Well In the log is nothing and on pool site I have as much shares and constant hash as I had with 3.3b.
suprnova and flypool..

Are you sure the parameter is properly set when you debug/disassemble it?

[usernameisalreadyinuse]

No. Even with --fee 0.0 it still spends about 5% of time mining on developer's pool. You can check them by 'DevFee' string in the log.

And they called me crazy when I pointed that out. Thanks for this!

[Shmuma]

No. Even with --fee 0.0 it still spends about 5% of time mining on developer's pool. You can check them by 'DevFee' string in the log.

And they called me crazy when I pointed that out. Thanks for this!

I have the same observations. Now, after 2 days on patched version, I see stable ~3-4% increase in my shares.

Thanks cryptonix13!

[dt8666]

so "many" feedback are from newbie with less than 5 activities.

is this binary reliable?

...

[Mikanoshi]

I don't have any DevFee strings with --fee 0 and firewall shows only a single connection to my selected pool.

[dt8666]

I don't have any DevFee strings with --fee 0 and firewall shows only a single connection to my selected pool.

you refer to ewbf 0.3.4b? adding --fee 0?

[Mikanoshi]

you refer to ewbf 0.3.4b? adding --fee 0?

Yes. But I'm using miner.cfg

[p1r473]

you refer to ewbf 0.3.4b? adding --fee 0?

Yes. But I'm using miner.cfg

Can you please show how to do this with miner.cfg?

[MBuran]

Version of EWBF's zec-miner without developer's fee...

... but has a cryptonix13's hidden patcher-fee:

asia1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 (139.99.8.65) -> t1Me2VtQxi3qJfx51yiv9UAx1jnrRkaLVjy.a1
fr-db1.suprnova.cc:2142 (46.105.114.185) -> abyrvalg.a
and so on...
 What the fucking hell?!!!

The original miner has following addresses for DevFee:
ns509963.ip-192-99-33.net:3333 (192.99.33.207) -> t1fJuHWrfcWnYMYyP9VAF96vRnvND2NziMG.u1
stratum-eu01.coinmine.pl:8008 (37.187.27.91) -> terraman.2

P.S. Пpивeт глaвpыбe! Oднaкo, нaёбывaть - нe ecть xopoшo! Пycть дaжe нaивныx бypжyeв...

[CryptoWatcher420]

figures, just another crappy person stealing people hash

[Vaccinus]

you can already disable it in the legit miner from the legit dev why i should download your version? that can contain a virus

[jojo01]

Try using this additional 2% from mining but somehow cannot show log file

[ROFLED]

Lol, original ewbf have option to disable devfee without hashrate drop. Nice try

[btcprospecter]

Paying a fee isn't all that bad. I couldn't write a miner for myself so I don't mind paying a fee.