JarzikCoin aka segwit2xCoin exposed: trying to get KYC crap on the code

[franky1]

DNS hardcode seeds is hard ...  

this will clear the problem andre

If you don't like the seeds, simply download the code yourself, change the seeds to whatever you like and then compile. It's that easy.  

the "hard" part is you cant really change things at runtime

[1714103927]

1714103927

[1714103927]

1714103927

[1714103927]

1714103927

[Andre_Goldman]

DNS hardcode seeds is hard ...  

this will clear the problem andre

If you don't like the seeds, simply download the code yourself, change the seeds to whatever you like and then compile. It's that easy.  

the "hard" part is you cant really change things at runtime

Yes I remember vaguely some polemics regards RFCs 882, 883, 973, 1035 ...

ps-> in case I get a good analogy to our current situation I'll post here 

[pooya87]

ok someone clarify this for me, (i am still not convinced about last one either).

first of all DNS seeds are used as a "fallback" method in case you have no prior known IPs to connect to or can not use the hardcoded list of nodes. this means one may not even use it at all...

and when you connect to these DNS seeds you just receive a list of IP addresses of bitcoin nodes to connect to as a start (to find other nodes if you have none).

it was individuals (the developers) list and now the code changed it to a couple of known services (bitpay, blockchain.info, bloq, don't recognize the other one).

my question is:
why is this bad?
and what the f**k this has to do with KYC?

[pereira4]

stop fudding, this has nothing to do with KYC.

Anyway i wont be running or using SW in any way shape or form.  

You mean that you won't be disposing of your SW coins that you get off the fork so that you can accumulate non SW coins? I admire your principles.  

I will be immediately liquidating some of them yes, and continue to liquidate as the market asserts itself based on the fact that users want low fees and fast confirmations, and a Bitcoin that can scale.

You fill find soon enough that the market doesn't want a blocksize increase. Maybe in the future, but not now, because we don't need it.

A hardfork needs way more research and dedication than this rushed up garbage.

https://bitcoinhardforkresearch.github.io/

If a hardfork happens and you are going to take that risk, it must have something of real value, not a dumb ass blocksize increase.

[crazyivan]

Bitcoin anonymity is the BIGGEST shit crypto currency has ever faced. It achieved nothing but allowed bunch of scammers, ponzi pumpers and pyramids lovers to find an excellent tool to scam people.

If I have nothing to hide concerning the source of my money, why the fuck anonymity??? Not to pay taxes you say? Well, you do want your kids to go school or your local hospital to work, ha?

Fuck this shit, anonymity s good only for people who ve got something to hide.

[pereira4]

Bitcoin anonymity is the BIGGEST shit crypto currency has ever faced. It achieved nothing but allowed bunch of scammers, ponzi pumpers and pyramids lovers to find an excellent tool to scam people.

If I have nothing to hide concerning the source of my money, why the fuck anonymity??? Not to pay taxes you say? Well, you do want your kids to go school or your local hospital to work, ha?

Fuck this shit, anonymity s good only for people who ve got something to hide.

Are you fucking kidding me? The whitepaper says "p2p cash". Cash includes anonymity. Don't give me the crime propaganda bullshit. If you don't want anonymity, then why the fuck are you even here? go use Ripple and stop caring about decentralization.

These guys want to put bitcoin inside corporate buildings via massive blocksize agendas. They want their own bitcoin that they can control. The value propositon of such a bitcoin is exactly 0, which is what the value of segwit2xCoin will be.

[aso118]

Bitcoin anonymity is the BIGGEST shit crypto currency has ever faced. It achieved nothing but allowed bunch of scammers, ponzi pumpers and pyramids lovers to find an excellent tool to scam people.

If I have nothing to hide concerning the source of my money, why the fuck anonymity??? Not to pay taxes you say? Well, you do want your kids to go school or your local hospital to work, ha?

Fuck this shit, anonymity s good only for people who ve got something to hide.

If that is your problem, there are enough government promoted e-coins which are coming up. Why don't you just move over?
And if people under a tyrannical ruler made a small religious donation, and got busted for it, you really wouldn't care. They don't need anonymity, do they?