Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 05:00:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Yacoin - The Eco-killer  (Read 2932 times)
Hydroponica (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


fml


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
 #41

And, last I checked, you can't shove 4 CPU's into a single tower, so, we are talking an entire PC for each CPU...

That's not entirely true.  It would be true if you said you can't shove 4x consumer-level i7's onto a single consumer-level motherboard.  Finding a motherboard that'll fit a normal ATX case and holds 4 Xeon CPU's is not particularly difficult.

4 Xeon CPU's, to barely hit the hash rate, of a single 7950....That is certainly cost effective Roll Eyes

WindMaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 06:58:25 PM
 #42

4 Xeon CPU's, to barely hit the hash rate, of a single 7950....That is certainly cost effective Roll Eyes

What was the hash rate of your 7950 for scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1) again?   Smiley
Hydroponica (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


fml


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:02:50 PM
 #43

4 Xeon CPU's, to barely hit the hash rate, of a single 7950....That is certainly cost effective Roll Eyes

What was the hash rate of your 7950 for scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1) again?   Smiley

I just mine an actual, profitable alt coin, LTC...And my hash rate is 550 KH/sec

TheSpiral
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 113


Sinbad Mixer: Mix Your BTC Quickly


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:03:18 PM
 #44

4 Xeon CPU's, to barely hit the hash rate, of a single 7950....That is certainly cost effective Roll Eyes

What was the hash rate of your 7950 for scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1) again?   Smiley
~650.
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 = ~750.

I just mine an actual, profitable alt coin, LTC...And my hash rate is 550 KH/sec
Because you can only mine 1 at a time, yes?
WindMaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:04:21 PM
 #45

What was the hash rate of your 7950 for scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1) again?   Smiley

I just mine an actual, profitable alt coin, LTC...And my hash rate is 550 KH/sec

Kinda an apples vs. oranges comparison then, eh?

Might that be equivalent to me saying my Radeon 5850's mine SHA-256 coins at 350MH/sec vs. your 7950 on scrypt at 0.55MH/sec and declare the 5850 the winner by several hundred times?
WindMaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:16:03 PM
 #46

What was the hash rate of your 7950 for scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1) again?   Smiley
~650.

I assume you meant ~650kH/sec for scrypt(1024,1,1) rather than scrypt+chacha/kekkac(32,1,1)?
fenican
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1394
Merit: 505


View Profile
May 12, 2013, 07:27:06 PM
 #47

CPU mining of a coin is only inefficient if the difficulty is extremely high.

Some in this thread are showing extreme ignorance by comparing CPU mining of LTC, a coin with 400+ difficulty, to CPU mining of YAC, a coin with 7+ difficulty

In very simple terms that I hope everyone can understand It takes fare more kh/s right now to mint a single LTC , due to difficulty, than to mint a single YAC

You can't compare a coin that is mostly CPU mined, low difficulty, to one that is mostly GPU mined high difficulty.  Apples to Oranges

What you can compare is total joules needed to mine a YAC v to mint an LTC.  At present difficulties, I think YAC wins that battle because - in part - it is so new

Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!