Which ICO Management Software Do You Recommend?

[JollyGood]

With all the pros & cons which would be the ICO companies/websites/software you recommend for a new project launch?

Ease of use and reputation are as important as is getting FIAT transferred to a bank account after the ICO ends.

[JollyGood]

Are there any?

Yes there are a few but they do not ooze confidence but ICO2GO certainly does have most of the pieces of the jigsaw in place. With just a little more work they could be ideal for all ICOs. Here are two listed below but there are a few more:

ico2go.com
The Good: Very nice UI, easy to understand and user friendly when logged in to the dashboard. All tokens, nodes, blockchain, escrow (literally everything is taken care of) as they do it all for you. Seems very professional. SURETLY are using them for their ICO. I will be keeping an eye on it to see how it goes.
The Bad: The pricing needs to be restructed. Paying a staggering 10% commission on all tokens created and also when removing your incoming funds in order to sell them means project team pays twice. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. There is no re-course if they steal the funds and vanish like Paul Vernon a la Cryptsy. Who are ICO2Go? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO?
The Pricing:
Option#1: FREE upfront cost and you must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (must display ico2go logo)
Option#2: 3 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to BTC/ETH. You must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)
Option#3: 10 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 5% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)
Option#4: 25 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 2% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)

https://www.startico.net
The Good: The licence free pricing structure is acceptable if is a one way transaction, not charging the project team twice (once when receiving funds and once when withdrawing)
The Bad: All links to their social media are diverted to free website company 'Wix'. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. Who are Startico? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO? Does not look a professional company at all.
The Pricing:
Option#1: Use for free and pay only 0.2% per transactions
Option#2: Buy a license for $6 000 or 2.5 BTC  0% transaction fees

[Start ICO]

Are there any?

Yes there are a few but they do not ooze confidence but ICO2GO certainly does have most of the pieces of the jigsaw in place. With just a little more work they could be ideal for all ICOs. Here are two listed below but there are a few more:

ico2go.com
The Good: Very nice UI, easy to understand and user friendly when logged in to the dashboard. All tokens, nodes, blockchain, escrow (literally everything is taken care of) as they do it all for you. Seems very professional. SURETLY are using them for their ICO. I will be keeping an eye on it to see how it goes.
The Bad: The pricing needs to be restructed. Paying a staggering 10% commission on all tokens created and also when removing your incoming funds in order to sell them means project team pays twice. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. There is no re-course if they steal the funds and vanish like Paul Vernon a la Cryptsy. Who are ICO2Go? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO?
The Pricing:
Option#1: FREE upfront cost and you must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (must display ico2go logo)
Option#2: 3 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to BTC/ETH. You must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)
Option#3: 10 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 5% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)
Option#4: 25 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 2% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect)

https://www.startico.net
The Good: The licence free pricing structure is acceptable if is a one way transaction, not charging the project team twice (once when receiving funds and once when withdrawing)
The Bad: All links to their social media are diverted to free website company 'Wix'. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. Who are Startico? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO? Does not look a professional company at all.
The Pricing:
Option#1: Use for free and pay only 0.2% per transactions
Option#2: Buy a license for $6 000 or 2.5 BTC  0% transaction fees

Hi! We updated our web-site https://www.startico.net Now we have Team and current projects. Links on social media will coming soon. We appriciate if you correct your review above Thank you!

[JollyGood]

Hi! We updated our web-site https://www.startico.net Now we have Team and current projects. Links on social media will coming soon. We appriciate if you correct your review above Thank you!

A very big thumbs up to you guys. You took a little constructive criticism, embraced it and made the changes...

So here is an update... startico.net have removed all social media links but have added an about us/the team page. It gives some background in to real people but does not explain the name of the entity/company any project team will enter in to a contract with for an ICO. Startico.net still needs to clarify their legal status (individual, group, shareholder, LLC, LTD, PLC) and also which jurisdiction they fall under (Russia or Ireland) because they list both. These are all things for potential ICO project teams to look at before deciding who to choose or to go it alone.

Does startico have the same all-in-one-setup-solution as ICO2GO where nodes, blockchains, token and everything else is taken care of? Then they need to elaborate on it a little more, highlight it a little more on their website.

[Start ICO]

Hi! We updated our web-site https://www.startico.net Now we have Team and current projects. Links on social media will coming soon. We appriciate if you correct your review above Thank you!

A very big thumbs up to you guys. You took a little constructive criticism, embraced it and made the changes...

So here is an update... startico.net have removed all social media links but have added an about us/the team page. It gives some background in to real people but does not explain the name of the entity/company any project team will enter in to a contract with for an ICO. Startico.net still needs to clarify their legal status (individual, group, shareholder, LLC, LTD, PLC) and also which jurisdiction they fall under (Russia or Ireland) because they list both. These are all things for potential ICO project teams to look at before deciding who to choose or to go it alone.

Does startico have the same all-in-one-setup-solution as ICO2GO where nodes, blockchains, token and everything else is taken care of? Then they need to elaborate on it a little more, highlight it a little more on their website.

Thank you!
Yes, we have all-in-one-setup-solution:
-landing page integration
-crowdseller account with token issuing
-buyer/investor account with order payments
-destribution on blockchain wallts (Waves, Bitshares, Omni, NXT)
-node for coin hosting
-escrow srevice

On request, not included in price:
-custom technical solutions of hosting (on client's servers or in cloud)
-takeing payments by Visa/MasterCard and Wire Transfer
-converting bitcoins to fiat money for investing in company.

PS things you are mentioned also fixed on our site https://www.startico.net Thank you!

[JollyGood]

Thank you!
Yes, we have all-in-one-setup-solution:
-landing page integration
-crowdseller account with token issuing
-buyer/investor account with order payments
-destribution on blockchain wallts (Waves, Bitshares, Omni, NXT)
-node for coin hosting
-escrow srevice

On request, not included in price:
-custom technical solutions of hosting (on client's servers or in cloud)
-takeing payments by Visa/MasterCard and Wire Transfer
-converting bitcoins to fiat money for investing in company.

PS things you are mentioned also fixed on site. Thank you!

You guys are very proactive. Good to see and thank you.

[YodaYoda]

With all the pros & cons which would be the ICO companies/websites/software you recommend for a new project launch?

Ease of use and reputation are as important as is getting FIAT transferred to a bank account after the ICO ends.

Not to flame here, but should you start an ICO if you don't have guys that can do that for you? You should hire those experts and have them on payroll, not outsource to those sites herein recommended. Not that I believe they have a poor service, but if you want to start an ico and don't know how to set up same services internally, it's like starting a bakery, not knowing how to make the dough. 
If a good dev/ico experienced guy see your plan and like it, you can pay most of the cost in tokens, like stock optios for key personnel doing an IPO.


Just my 2 cents.

[JollyGood]

Not to flame here, but should you start an ICO if you don't have guys that can do that for you? You should hire those experts and have them on payroll, not outsource to those sites herein recommended. Not that I believe they have a poor service, but if you want to start an ico and don't know how to set up same services internally, it's like starting a bakery, not knowing how to make the dough. 
If a good dev/ico experienced guy see your plan and like it, you can pay most of the cost in tokens, like stock optios for key personnel doing an IPO.


Just my 2 cents.

Thanks for posting. The idea was to have a project team that will handle the nodes and blockchain etc and whole set up but still the ICO needs to be managed as funds will be coming in, they need to be exchanged for tokens and they need to be released too once the ICO has ended.

The idea of the thread was to bounce ideas of each other to find out which is the best software or website out there and how their UI varies along with its fees and so on. I started the thread with two hoping others would give inputs and list their recommended ones too.

[ArdiPrabowo]

you can use tokenmarket is the best ico management software
in there all in service escrow, ico siste systeme, promotion, announcement thread and campaign manager in bounty campaign

[JollyGood]

you can use tokenmarket is the best ico management software
in there all in service escrow, ico siste systeme, promotion, announcement thread and campaign manager in bounty campaign

Thank you. On their website they have not advertised their fee structure.

[AspEEd81]

I heard there are companies that help you with the ICO and take only percentage from your future incomes.
Do you heard of it?

[JollyGood]

I heard there are companies that help you with the ICO and take only percentage from your future incomes.
Do you heard of it?

I believe both I listed in the OP have options to either pay upfront and pay no future percentages or pay nothing upfront and pay using percentages.

[JollyGood]

Ico2go and startico have token creation and blockchain/node creation included in their fees but Dimcoin for example uses coinpayments because of their commission rates.

It has a simple sign up process on their website where you only enter a name, address, telephone number and amount to invest then click to continue. After that you end up on coinpayments merchant page where you asked to select which coin to invest. Does that mean the Dimcoin team then manually add tokens/coins to their investors wallets? This might take a long time to add manually if there are hundreds of investors. Does anyone know?

[abhinav_thakur01]

Ico2go and startico have token creation and blockchain/node creation included in their fees but Dimcoin for example uses coinpayments because of their commission rates.

It has a simple sign up process on their website where you only enter a name, address, telephone number and amount to invest then click to continue. After that you end up on coinpayments merchant page where you asked to select which coin to invest. Does that mean the Dimcoin team then manually add tokens/coins to their investors wallets? This might take a long time to add manually if there are hundreds of investors. Does anyone know?

Well, I believe there must be a link between the mobile number and name of the canditate and the payment system and this is how they could be verifying it else manula transactions can no way support their fast structure.

[JollyGood]

Well, I believe there must be a link between the mobile number and name of the canditate and the payment system and this is how they could be verifying it else manula transactions can no way support their fast structure.

If that is the case does anyone know how they are achieving it?

[fakecryptsynagger]

 indirectly involving fiat currency not so good idea @_@ dragging more problematic for you

[JollyGood]

indirectly involving fiat currency not so good idea @_@ dragging more problematic for you

About creating tokens, should it be done?

[wnj4]

creating tokens by ICO Management Software, so most of the ICO we was saw without development team!

[JollyGood]

creating tokens by ICO Management Software, so most of the ICO we was saw without development team!

Sherlock, thank you for your input 

So to explain again, I do not want to pay commission to an ICO management company and prefer to keep funds it in house where possible. I think using an escrow and paying commission is not what appeals to me when there must be ways of doing it to save money.

If I go with an ICO company then the work is complete but if I go alone, raising funds and having the escrow has been sorted out but am asking about which company people recommend for creating tokens and how to connect those tokens to the investors (wallets) automatically rather than manually one by one.

[Start ICO]

creating tokens by ICO Management Software, so most of the ICO we was saw without development team!

Sherlock, thank you for your input 

So to explain again, I do not want to pay commission to an ICO management company and prefer to keep funds it in house where possible. I think using an escrow and paying commission is not what appeals to me when there must be ways of doing it to save money.

If I go with an ICO company then the work is complete but if I go alone, raising funds and having the escrow has been sorted out but am asking about which company people recommend for creating tokens and how to connect those tokens to the investors (wallets) automatically rather than manually one by one.

Hi dear JollyGood!
We can create token for you for free, but our position - our client should do it by himself because of safety.
If you cooperate with us, you will always control your funds by yourself. We just organaze purchasing of tokens and destributing it to investros. Also we have prising plan with escrow service.
Visit our site https://www.startico.net or send me PM for more questions.