[ANN][YAC][POOL]p2pool for yacoin!!

[DonChate]

Found another, was a bit of a barren patch there!

Need more hashing power - I'll crank up the dial if other people will hop in..

Does pool payout properly?

Dunno, the update hasn't been posted on Github yet from what I can tell.

updating your git soon to make this a real p2pool and not just a single node?

ntkrnl, why are you blocking connections to your node?

[caish5]

I'm hoping for an updated git to set up my own node too.

[erk]

Or at least publish the diffs so we can patch the buggy version manually.

[ntkrnl]

Found another, was a bit of a barren patch there!

Need more hashing power - I'll crank up the dial if other people will hop in..

Does pool payout properly?

Dunno, the update hasn't been posted on Github yet from what I can tell.

updating your git soon to make this a real p2pool and not just a single node?

ntkrnl, why are you blocking connections to your node?

Or at least publish the diffs so we can patch the buggy version manually.

When a connection established,  "share hash error" is flooded into the client console....... it's terrible
so I decide to throw out the code after this bug is fixed.

I'm hoping for an updated git to set up my own node too.

Don't worry, it won't take a long time
In fact, I stared at  pool.bitcn.org to check if there is a problem.
This took me a few hours.

[caish5]

I've opened port 12561 to my computer but I'm not seeing any peers.

I've also tried
-n rav3n.dtdns.net:9355
and
-n 198.84.186.74:12561
all to no avail

[rav3n_pl]

I killed my node after 24hrs because pool code is broken.
Till it will be updated/fixed I`ll not run it again, sorry.

[caish5]

I killed my node after 24hrs because pool code is broken.
Till it will be updated/fixed I`ll not run it again, sorry.

Yeah it seems as if pool.bitcn.org has no peers either.

[dms2012]

Been about 6hours since the last block was found..

[nearmiss]

well,  hashrate does seem to be about half of what it was yesterday

[erk]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

[ntkrnl]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

[erk]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

Thanks, that seems to be working.
Is there anyway to set the default payout address or is that removed?

[ntkrnl]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

Thanks, that seems to be working.
Is there anyway to set the default payout address or is that removed?

In the POS(PROOF OF STACK) featured coin, when a block is mined, and submitted to the client, it must be signed with your public key, while bitcoin/litecoin don't have to. That' why novacoin p2pool delete "-address" option.  Because when you specify an address, it's just a hash160(pubkey), not your publish key, yacoind will throw an error "sign block failed".

In the lastest version of yacoin-p2pool, no matter what the "fee" is, the host user of p2pool will be paid at least 0.01, just for the pubkey, without this, you can never sign a block.

So, if you want to specify an individual address, use the worker-name-as-address mode.

[erk]

In the POS(PROOF OF STACK) featured coin, when a block is mined, and submitted to the client, it must be signed with your public key, while bitcoin/litecoin don't have to. That' why novacoin p2pool delete "-address" option.  Because when you specify an address, it's just a hash160(pubkey), not your publish key, yacoind will throw an error "sign block failed".

In the lastest version of yacoin-p2pool, no matter what the "fee" is, the host user of p2pool will be paid at least 0.01, just for the pubkey, without this, you can never sign a block.

So, if you want to specify an individual address, use the worker-name-as-address mode.
[/quote]

I see, it's created a new account in the yacoind server node's wallet called p2pool and added a payout address to that for the fees.

Lets hope a few more people put up some nodes with the updated code, it' a bit lonely on the YAC  p2pool net atm.

[rav3n_pl]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

My node lost connection, Im solo again :/
Pls add me on run: -n rav3n.dtdns.net:9355

[erk]

If you are using the latest code from github it should have a boot node in it that worked for me.

[chedigital]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

My node lost connection, Im solo again :/
Pls add me on run: -n rav3n.dtdns.net:9355

I'm down too.

"lost contact with bitcoind"

[erk]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

My node lost connection, Im solo again :/
Pls add me on run: -n rav3n.dtdns.net:9355

I'm down too.

"lost contact with bitcoind

The boot node must have gone down before yo peered, I am on a train on my iPad so I cant do an add node ATM. Will do one when I get home if you post IP. The boot node is the one on the first page of this thread, it's web page is responding bu the hash rate had died.

[ntkrnl]

The broken code on github hasn't been updated in 3 days.

What's the progress?

It's OK now.

My node lost connection, Im solo again :/
Pls add me on run: -n rav3n.dtdns.net:9355

I'm down too.

"lost contact with bitcoind"

Sorry, I'm debugging the server.

[fronti]

not sure if this is normal, as I'm not that familar with p2pool right now:

Code:

utgoing connection to peer 91.235.254.37:9355 established. p2pool version: 1100 'b2de428-dirty'
2013-05-16 10:45:21.310680 Sending 1 shares to 91.235.254.37:9355
2013-05-16 10:45:21.364218 Peer sent entire transaction d569d639cecd98d005c22dc854f2eea8be35ab5c7c6c66dae82338cf136c0afe that was already received
2013-05-16 10:45:21.375079 Lost peer 91.235.254.37:9355 - Connection was closed cleanly.
2013-05-16 10:45:21.375517 > in handle_share_hashes:
2013-05-16 10:45:21.375557 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-05-16 10:45:21.375591 > Failure: twisted.internet.error.ConnectionDone: Connection was closed cleanly.

this comes around every 5 seconds..


and another question:
if I run on a windwos host a miner minerd_scrypt_jane_x64 i got this:

Code:

 Worker a submitted share with hash > target:
2013-05-16 10:47:14.835635     Hash:   3cdb25c5746ad9ff4a5002b135160be5a0351dc07b9c62bbe853364b20b4f9e8
2013-05-16 10:47:14.835676     Target: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

is this OK?