[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees

[chermah]

Due to high transaction fee and delays in accepting and processing bitcoin transaction, we have temporarily suspended payments for goods with Bitcoin on https://fudmartng.com  till it's favourable to our customers and us.Customers can pay with #BitcoinCash , #Dash and #Litecoin

Another business switching for alts, close your eyes baby we have no problem in bitcoin, everything is fine lol

Please BTC guys stop trolling us, this is a bitcoin cash topic ...

[1715536123]

1715536123

[1715536123]

1715536123

[1715536123]

1715536123

[1715536123]

1715536123

[Mrpumperitis]

BCH is a chinese shitcoin.. it will bounce again someday :-D lmao

With your comment you make it very clear that you have no idea what bitcoin is. Please refrain from making erroneous or unconstructive comments for the sake of new users

no actually ive been involved since 2012 so fuck fake BCH shitcoin and the trolls they rode up on :-D  clowns<<

your a racist noob, mate, you want to remove segshit but dont understand you cant,lols...you are lost.

[David48l]

The new DAA was supposed to stabilise the block generation but now BCH is only doing a average of 2 blocks per hour because it keeps adjusting the difficulty and appears to be keeping BTC just that bit more profitable (anything from 20% - 100% ive seen) I wonder if it will stabilise after a few days or if its just as broken as before just in the opposite direction

You do not have to worry, the new difficulty setting is still dealing with the old EDA, you need at least 144 blocks to work correctly. Be patient and enjoy a coffee, I invite you, I guess you accept bch;)

[gembitz]

BCH is a chinese shitcoin.. it will bounce again someday :-D lmao

With your comment you make it very clear that you have no idea what bitcoin is. Please refrain from making erroneous or unconstructive comments for the sake of new users

no actually ive been involved since 2012 so fuck fake BCH shitcoin and the trolls they rode up on :-D  clowns<<

your a racist noob, mate, you want to remove segshit but dont understand you cant,lols...you are lost.

proof? how much you wanna bet we can remove SegWit easy..you are new here? :-D n00bzzz yawn

[Children of Gaia]

it is so ridiculous. bch has good chances to become more valuable than btc. are you afraid of that? because you behave like little children. bch has more to offer. the times of bitcoin are over.

Bitcore has more to offer than both BTC and BCH, so what?

[classicsucks]

So all I'm seeing is miners jumping around from btc to bch and who knows what else comes in the future..this has a big effect on the price of bch.

If that's all you see, you may want to consider having an optometry test...

from 21.co: For the median BTC transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 174,020 satoshis. That's an average of $11.31 per transaction at today's price, that's still taking several hours to complete, wow. Mempool over 100k unconfirmed for the past week. But don't worry, Lightning is only 18 months away! /sarc The BTC network has too much friction...

People who don't think the volume on South Korean exchanges is real aren't reading carefully. https://www.bitcoinisle.com/2017/11/11/operation-to-bypass-chinas-capital-controls-using-bitcoin-ends-up-in-south-korean-court/

Code:

The case involves a transfer of 12 billion won, which is almost USD $11 million at press time. 
In addition, the prosecutor also charged a money lender (Mr. D, age 33), who illegally exchanged 5 billion yuan, 
approximately USD $756 million, to bitcoin and into won using the same technique.

Are you catching on? Try substituting "Bitcoin Cash" everywhere you see "Bitcoin"...

[David48l]

It is true, there is a lot of troll in this forum, they must be really worried about their segwit coin. I think they should devote more effort to fix this

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

instead of coming to tell lies about bch, they are pathetic jaja

[European Central Bank]

i predict within 10 more pages i will reach one entire page of ignores. my first time ever. great work, guys.

i'll take bcash serious when they have a road map, stop brigading and stop spamming bitcoin.

until then i've seen more skilled and mature campaigns from teenage girls driving each other to suicide.

[abeke]

it is so ridiculous. bch has good chances to become more valuable than btc. are you afraid of that? because you behave like little children. bch has more to offer. the times of bitcoin are over.

What I like that it's much faster and lower fees than BTC. Soon enough it will just surpass BTC.

[jbreher]

what is the small exploit in the POW?  I think that first sentence if false.  There is no small exploit.  what is that referencing?  does anybody know?     

https://themerkle.com/what-is-asicboost/

Referring to ASICBOOST as an exploit seems rather silly. After all, its availability is a direct consequence of the algorithm chosen, derivable directly from first principles. And you can bet your sweet bippy that -- should TPTB ever get into the mining biz in order to coopt Bitcoin -- they'll be using the exact same techniques. We need to be ready to match them hash-for-hash. For only in an _excess_ of honest miners do we retain a usable system.

[classicsucks]

what is the small exploit in the POW?  I think that first sentence if false.  There is no small exploit.  what is that referencing?  does anybody know?    

https://themerkle.com/what-is-asicboost/

Referring to ASICBOOST as an exploit seems rather silly. After all, its availability is a direct consequence of the algorithm chosen, derivable directly from first principles. And you can bet your sweet bippy that -- should TPTB ever get into the mining biz in order to coopt Bitcoin -- they'll be using the exact same techniques. We need to be ready to match them hash-for-hash. For only in an _excess_ of honest miners do we retain a usable system.

To understand Kore minions, you have to use the Kore-speak Translation Matrix:

optimization = "exploit"
hard fork = "attack"
forking the code = "attack"
specification = "code"
former Kore dev = "attacker"
advocate for sane solutions = "troll"
etc.

Anybody read Gerard? https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2017/11/12/news-lightning-network-new-layer-monero-popularity-ico-securities-tether-analysis-devouring-the-past/

As a sysadmin for developers, I’m pretty familiar with the antipattern “add another layer of indirection to avoid finally dealing with the actual hard bit,” and how it signals the project is circling the drain; perhaps the Lightning Network will prove me wrong.

LOL only 18 more months

[serby10101010001100010]

twas nice to see that bch rally to almost 3ks last week, let's see what the market has in store for us, it's going to be very interesting.

[hv_]

what is the small exploit in the POW?  I think that first sentence if false.  There is no small exploit.  what is that referencing?  does anybody know?    

https://themerkle.com/what-is-asicboost/

Referring to ASICBOOST as an exploit seems rather silly. After all, its availability is a direct consequence of the algorithm chosen, derivable directly from first principles. And you can bet your sweet bippy that -- should TPTB ever get into the mining biz in order to coopt Bitcoin -- they'll be using the exact same techniques. We need to be ready to match them hash-for-hash. For only in an _excess_ of honest miners do we retain a usable system.

To understand Kore minions, you have to use the Kore-speak Translation Matrix:

optimization = "exploit"
hard fork = "attack"
forking the code = "attack"
specification = "code"
former Kore dev = "attacker"
advocate for sane solutions = "troll"
etc.

Anybody read Gerard? https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2017/11/12/news-lightning-network-new-layer-monero-popularity-ico-securities-tether-analysis-devouring-the-past/

As a sysadmin for developers, I’m pretty familiar with the antipattern “add another layer of indirection to avoid finally dealing with the actual hard bit,” and how it signals the project is circling the drain; perhaps the Lightning Network will prove me wrong.

LOL only 18 more months

....

Move away mining power = "attack"
Move away funds = "attack"
Critisism = "FUD"
Critical thinker = "enemy"

[Mrpumperitis]

Ohhhh i just heard some big news ......BCH trading pairs 

[David48l]

i predict within 10 more pages i will reach one entire page of ignores. my first time ever. great work, guys.

i'll take bcash serious when they have a road map, stop brigading and stop spamming bitcoin.

until then i've seen more skilled and mature campaigns from teenage girls driving each other to suicide.

I respect your decision, what I do not understand is what you do in this forum if you do not understand or hate bch. Do you have personal problems and do you need to get all the shit out here? I recommend a very good forum ..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.365960

but measure your words well because they use censorship

[tekmobile]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

[gembitz]

im kinda butthurt i missed the pumpining now ill buy back down to around .10? :\ hmmm poof!

[classicsucks]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

But the image of Adam Back sweating while trying to carve zeroes and ones into a stone tablet is priceless!

[gembitz]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

it's not a lie even tho certain core members are beholden to segwit/ln :-D bitcoin will scale<<

[tekmobile]

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize