#Darren (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 784
Merit: 250
DIA | Data infrastructure for DeFi
|
|
May 14, 2013, 02:01:35 PM Last edit: May 14, 2013, 02:30:00 PM by #Darren |
|
and that the bail out money goes to these private people, who then charge interest on it?
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 02:04:33 PM |
|
No.
Its not a Jewish conspiracy either just in case that's your follow up.
Same answer for New World Order, Trilateral Commission, Communist Party, Bilderbergs and umpteen other people who do not own the Fed.
|
|
|
|
bitdragon
|
|
May 14, 2013, 02:09:39 PM |
|
No.
Its not a Jewish conspiracy either just in case that's your follow up.
Same answer for New World Order, Trilateral Commission, Communist Party, Bilderbergs and umpteen other people who do not own the Fed.
indeed, everything is taken care of. Do not worry ! This short video will bring you peace of mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhZFYGFbTPA
|
|
|
|
#Darren (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 784
Merit: 250
DIA | Data infrastructure for DeFi
|
|
May 14, 2013, 02:21:55 PM |
|
No.
Its not a Jewish conspiracy either just in case that's your follow up.
Same answer for New World Order, Trilateral Commission, Communist Party, Bilderbergs and umpteen other people who do not own the Fed.
wow - d-e-f-e-n-s-i-v-e
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 02:36:52 PM |
|
No.
Its not a Jewish conspiracy either just in case that's your follow up.
Same answer for New World Order, Trilateral Commission, Communist Party, Bilderbergs and umpteen other people who do not own the Fed.
wow - d-e-f-e-n-s-i-v-e You are right. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Alpaca John
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2013, 03:56:33 PM Last edit: May 14, 2013, 04:18:49 PM by Alpaca John |
|
Well, it's owned and managed by both private banks and the government, which is in turn 'owned'(/corrupted) by private banks. So, although indirectly, yes. sources: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/FederalReserve_System.pnghttp://www.opensecrets.org/industries/edit: Oh and to answer your follow-up question. The bail-out money went to private banks. The thing you just suggested happened is a very accurate description of what private banks are in business for. So that's another yes.
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
|
|
May 14, 2013, 04:39:08 PM |
|
My understanding is that it is a privately owned corporation, but their corporate charter is a federal statute rather than an ordinary corporate charter. The member banks are the shareholders, but being a shareholder doesn't confer the usual control that a normally chartered corporation would have. As in, the "owners" can't change the bylaws, etc.
|
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8 I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 14, 2013, 04:49:25 PM |
|
1)No.
Its not a 2)Jewish conspiracy either just in case that's your follow up.
Same answer for 3)New World Order, Trilateral Commission, Communist Party, Bilderbergs and umpteen other people who do not own the Fed.
1) It is all a matter of perspective. If control and ownership are not synonymous, then it is irrelevant who owns it, but more appropriate who controls its actions. From my understanding the FED acts independent of government whose interest should be, the prosperity of the people. If the Fed was under control of government it would let the "owners" audit the books. 2) Or an Al-Qaeda funding body (can't prove it just saying), the question did not provoke anything to do with religion. 3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact.
|
Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
|
|
|
Alpaca John
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2013, 04:57:51 PM |
|
Max Keiser did a very well job of explaining why people like myself can't give a shit about no illuminati or bilderberg or whatever conspiracy you can come up with: we clearly don't NEED any of these conspiracy's to prove that we're all being exploided by a small elite group. http://youtu.be/nd7v5MSRdpw
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:06:31 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact.
Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:33:18 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy.
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:45:47 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. I spent time in Singapore and London - the class of people who live at the top there have no country or race. They have billions in capital and are free to live off their investments close to tax free while their maids pay taxes. Question is; isn't that how capitalism is meant to work? People who inherit capital live tax free off investments. Their investments create jobs for the peons. The peon's salaries create demand for products which leads to economic growth. All seems to be working as planned.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:48:11 PM |
|
It is owned by Dick Cheney. Sleep well.
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:50:44 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right?
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:54:37 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right? No - thats an implementation detail. As is the ECB and the Fed. I meant that there is indeed an oligarchy of rich powerful people who are beyond taxation and largely beyond the law. But that is how you would expect things to work...in any game there will be winners and inheritance means that some people are born certain to win.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 14, 2013, 05:56:45 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right? No - thats an implementation detail. As is the ECB and the Fed. Right, an implementation detail of international central planning. In other words, the world is being run by an international oligarchy.
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 06:00:04 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right? No - thats an implementation detail. As is the ECB and the Fed. Right, an implementation detail of international central planning. In other words, the world is being run by an international oligarchy. Not run by them but seriously influenced. If millionaires formed a political party, they would have the overwhelming majority of Congress, the Judiciary and the Presidency. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/06/if-the-millionaires-party-ever-gets-its-act-together-watch-out/ They haven't but you can't expect those institutions to act hard against millionaires can you? Likewise you can't expect much action billionaires disapprove of.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 14, 2013, 06:03:49 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right? No - thats an implementation detail. As is the ECB and the Fed. Right, an implementation detail of international central planning. In other words, the world is being run by an international oligarchy. Not run by them but seriously influenced. If millionaires formed a political party, they would have the overwhelming majority of Congress, the Judiciary and the Presidency. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/06/if-the-millionaires-party-ever-gets-its-act-together-watch-out/ They haven't but you can't expect those institutions to act hard against millionaires can you? Likewise you can't expect much action billionaires disapprove of. And you wonder why I'm an anarchist?
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 14, 2013, 06:08:03 PM |
|
3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World. The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world. We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact. Not to feed into conspiracies but it is not (new world) order but rather new (world order). A change in the way the world is run. The point is the same. It's not a conspiracy, it's just plain facts. The world is being run by an international oligarchy. I know what you mean. You mean this, right? No - thats an implementation detail. As is the ECB and the Fed. Right, an implementation detail of international central planning. In other words, the world is being run by an international oligarchy. Not run by them but seriously influenced. If millionaires formed a political party, they would have the overwhelming majority of Congress, the Judiciary and the Presidency. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/06/if-the-millionaires-party-ever-gets-its-act-together-watch-out/ They haven't but you can't expect those institutions to act hard against millionaires can you? Likewise you can't expect much action billionaires disapprove of. And you wonder why I'm an anarchist? Anarchism wouldn't' make any difference. The rich and powerful will still have the men with guns.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
May 14, 2013, 06:10:55 PM |
|
Anarchism wouldn't' make any difference. The rich and powerful will still have the men with guns.
And the poor, who are by definition more numerous than even the praetorian class, will also have guns. If it comes to a shooting war... well, there's a reason kings don't have a lot of power anymore.
|
|
|
|
|