Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too!

[LTU_btc]

First of all, I think that main problem of campaign management. If manager accepts shitposts, any rules can't help to reduce spam.
If campaign have fixed rates and they require to make 20-25 posts weekly, users don't need to spam. As other already said, Fortunejack campaign users have to spam in gambling board to get payment.
But anyway, users in pay per post campaigns also makes spam, because many people always trying to reach maximum allowed posts to get biggest possible payment.
I'm saying that only good management of campaign can minimize spam. Lauda's Bitmixer wasn't perfect, because there was some users spamming, but still, it was one of campaigns, which was managed as it should be.

[hilariousetc]

It's alright suggesting these things but numerous rules/restrictions and ideas have been proposed to combat spam but theymos never responds to them so not much that can be done. Things like being harsher on poorly run campaigns can easily be implemented but then there's proposals like making users pay a fee to get a bigger signature which are more difficult/controversial but would stop people signing up purely to earn here without at least investing in bitcoin/their account.

Asking users to pay a fee for using signatures would indeed be controversial. Especially if they get banned for spamming after that, the users would cry themselves hoarse about how the forum is scamming them.

True,  but we wouldn't need to ban anyone if campaign managers did their job properly and they didn't pay poor posters or accept them in the first place. I think we should just move towards banning poorly run campaigns instead because it's unmanageable and unfair for staff to essential run campaigns for them and once they start having their accounts banned and ico threads trashed they should start to get the idea.

[actmyname]

And what about signature campaigns not allowing to post in certain forum section why do you think there is difference between them and sig camp which are forcing people to post in certain sections?

What you posted above is different because it's not a forced bump (I myself don't do this because I have nothing to say in the threads).

The difference between signature campaigns forcing posts in sections vs. them discounting posts in others is that the former is more limited than the latter. The former pushes one to post in Gambling for example (FJ, always resort to it) to which one may not be able to find enough discussion that they can be constructive in during the week.

I frequent Scam Accusations, Reputation, Meta and Gambling. If I'm forced to post in Gambling then I'm sucked out of 3/4 of my discussions. When I'm limited to boards that are not Scam Accusations, Reputation and Meta, then I can still cover ground in other boards, sifting through the shitmounds of spam to find some good things.And I think the percentage is closer to 98%