BTC or BCC

[un1que]

Which coin should I keep? I mean it will going to seperated but which is going to be profitable more ?

[maeusi]

I am quite sure, that bitcoin will stay the leading cryptocurrency and bcc maybe will even disappear . But you needn't choose against bitcoin or bcc. You will get bcc for free 1:1 if you are owner of bitcoin. So you can  watch what will happen before you exchange your coins.

[Risktaker31]

Which coin should I keep? I mean it will going to seperated but which is going to be profitable more ?

dont believe on BCC

[bathrobehero]

BCC is silly altcoin.

BTC will remain BTC.

[dipok07]

I just trust Btc not Bcc.

[go4crypto]

Everywhere I checked, people are mostly against BCC so BTC will remain the main choice.

[MBrandoeye]

Hold both but BTC will be always the big one

[kekek]

Sell your BCC for BTC and enjoy the free money

[bitcoinvestor]

Which coin should I keep? I mean it will going to seperated but which is going to be profitable more ?

I think BTC is still the option I choose because more exchanger still accept BTC rather than BCC. You can cash your BCC if you don't convert into BTC. BCC will be the next asset become it is going to be new  coin. New coin not accepted by exchanger because it has no infrastructur like BTC.

[agustina2]

Which coin should I keep? I mean it will going to seperated but which is going to be profitable more ?

It's your decision mate. What if people here will told you to hold BTC or BCC then it doesn't goes to the direction you want, you will blame them? If you believe in bitcoin then hold it while on the other hand, if you believe that BCC will give you more profit then choose BCC.

Analyze the current trend and spend time to think where do you stand your side.

[AuctusProject]

Be careful when referring Bitcoin Cash as BCC, because this is BitCoinnect.

[misterbigg]

I would prefer BTC but would recommend to checkout for alts as an option
most of the alts are falling hard, its not bad to pick few of good alts

[xtyling]

There is only one true king!

[favila]

BTC has the majority support so will have the highest price but as to which one will be the most profitable is a difficult question to answer. BCC is untested but could prove to become more profitable over time and will likely always have some value just as ETC does in the ETC/ETH comparison.

[Pab]

So 1 aug i go to shop to buy cigarettes,i pay from my pocket in btc cash,in what currency i will get a change
If seagweet will be succesfoul bcc wil die.I dont trust bcc all that situation is owful

[bathrobehero]

BCC is the sad manifestation of a very small yet very loud group of people who believe they know better for everyone else. They believe they represent everyone while they are utterly disconnected from the silent majority who actually uses BTC on a daily basis.

They are the people you can't possibly argue with, and if BTC was launched with 8 MB blocks, they'd still do the same but with a higher number.

They can't possibly understand that transactions should have a price and Bitcoin is not intended for dust transactions. Even if the blocksize was 50 MB, eventually casinos, dice games and various services would fill the blocks with dust transactions requiring users to increase their fees to compete. It's a very simple notion they can't seem to understand.

After <insert the latest fork proposition> propaganda ended, we now currently have 10223 unconfirmed transactions (which is very low) compared to 100k+ when the network was spammed by supporters of various fork attempts.

And considering how high BTC's price is and how many new people are interested in it, the backlog is really nothing. Besides, with 8MB blocks, the whole network could be spammed for the same amount of money - if transaction fees are linear.

You have to have a market for transactions, because spamming the network will always happen! 100k transaction backlog with 1MB blocks or 800k transactions with 8 MB blocks doesn't make any difference at al - it costs the same!


Besides, transaction fees going to miners are intended as blockrewards decrease...

The whole thins only really going to temporarily set BTC back in exchange of having some power over it. But at least the real BCC buy walls will actually show how many people actually care about this abomination.

PS.: what a dumb name Bitcoin Cash actually is?

[boris singer]

We need to see how and what a bitcoincash breakthrough, I am quite curious about this coin because it can be directly owned for free in accordance with amount of btc in our exchanges wallet. Many people have negative connotations, but it's natural because there is no business proposal from this coin that has been proven.

[JohnMacaron]

BCC is the sad manifestation of a very small yet very loud group of people who believe they know better for everyone else. They believe they represent everyone while they are utterly disconnected from the silent majority who actually uses BTC on a daily basis.

They are the people you can't possibly argue with, and if BTC was launched with 8 MB blocks, they'd still do the same but with a higher number.

They can't possibly understand that transactions should have a price and Bitcoin is not intended for dust transactions. Even if the blocksize was 50 MB, eventually casinos, dice games and various services would fill the blocks with dust transactions requiring users to increase their fees to compete. It's a very simple notion they can't seem to understand.

After <insert the latest fork proposition> propaganda ended, we now currently have 10223 unconfirmed transactions (which is very low) compared to 100k+ when the network was spammed by supporters of various fork attempts.

And considering how high BTC's price is and how many new people are interested in it, the backlog is really nothing. Besides, with 8MB blocks, the whole network could be spammed for the same amount of money - if transaction fees are linear.

You have to have a market for transactions, because spamming the network will always happen! 100k transaction backlog with 1MB blocks or 800k transactions with 8 MB blocks doesn't make any difference at al - it costs the same!


Besides, transaction fees going to miners are intended as blockrewards decrease...

The whole thins only really going to temporarily set BTC back in exchange of having some power over it. But at least the real BCC buy walls will actually show how many people actually care about this abomination.

PS.: what a dumb name Bitcoin Cash actually is?

I'll tell u smth boy. Bitcoin Cash means that by means of by far larger adjustable block size BCC will be able to process all transactions it needs to. Adjustable block cap means that there will not be such an issue like people defecting from bitcoin because it's congested like toilet pipe and crowded by speculators and gamblers. BitcoinCash is the future, while Bitcoin BIP148 is sinking shit. it's going down, boy

[Seansky]

We need to see how and what a bitcoincash breakthrough, I am quite curious about this coin because it can be directly owned for free in accordance with amount of btc in our exchanges wallet. Many people have negative connotations, but it's natural because there is no business proposal from this coin that has been proven.

It is very normal that people will have negative connotations about it, they are like that in bitcoin at first, after all. In my opinion, bitcoin cash would be just like ethereum classic, that is always having some percent of value so I think it will still be worth it to hold both btc and bcc when the time comes, they can also both be as profitable as it is now. For now I think it bcc would have a dump, after all many will get it for free.

[bathrobehero]

BCC is the sad manifestation of a very small yet very loud group of people who believe they know better for everyone else. They believe they represent everyone while they are utterly disconnected from the silent majority who actually uses BTC on a daily basis.

They are the people you can't possibly argue with, and if BTC was launched with 8 MB blocks, they'd still do the same but with a higher number.

They can't possibly understand that transactions should have a price and Bitcoin is not intended for dust transactions. Even if the blocksize was 50 MB, eventually casinos, dice games and various services would fill the blocks with dust transactions requiring users to increase their fees to compete. It's a very simple notion they can't seem to understand.

After <insert the latest fork proposition> propaganda ended, we now currently have 10223 unconfirmed transactions (which is very low) compared to 100k+ when the network was spammed by supporters of various fork attempts.

And considering how high BTC's price is and how many new people are interested in it, the backlog is really nothing. Besides, with 8MB blocks, the whole network could be spammed for the same amount of money - if transaction fees are linear.

You have to have a market for transactions, because spamming the network will always happen! 100k transaction backlog with 1MB blocks or 800k transactions with 8 MB blocks doesn't make any difference at al - it costs the same!


Besides, transaction fees going to miners are intended as blockrewards decrease...

The whole thins only really going to temporarily set BTC back in exchange of having some power over it. But at least the real BCC buy walls will actually show how many people actually care about this abomination.

PS.: what a dumb name Bitcoin Cash actually is?

I'll tell u smth boy. Bitcoin Cash means that by means of by far larger adjustable block size BCC will be able to process all transactions it needs to. Adjustable block cap means that there will not be such an issue like people defecting from bitcoin because it's congested like toilet pipe and crowded by speculators and gamblers. BitcoinCash is the future, while Bitcoin BIP148 is sinking shit. it's going down, boy

Bitcoin already processes all transactions it needs to. You'd know if you'd use it and not just talk about using it.

Go back to your ciclejerk that is /r/btc, "boy". Regardless of block sizes, transactions will eventually cost the same because you can spam 1MB blocks just the same as 8MB blocks for the same amount of money if fees scale linearly. Maybe try understanding basic principles like this instead of calling people "boys".