The website is up as a way for investors to get refunds easier. Easier for me to distribute, and them to login and withdraw.
It's not up for players to deposit and play.
That part I understand, they can however play with existing tokens which they could lose. If they win, payout will be based on the crypto game they won.
If I thought there was a chance old players would play and I had the time I would open it to players again and any profit the site made would just go to investor refunds.
If that was the case I would close the site the moment the last token was refunded.
This is a defeatist attitude one would not expect from you. What has changed for you to hold this view?
I have no long term goal with the website or brand and have no interest in trying to make a profit with it.
The question arises: why have you given up on it? (I am not saying you should or should not give up on betking because my perspective as a non-token holder would depend purely on what you claim your intention is).
What has changed this time in the latest attempt to re-launch. If it is purely to allow those holding BKB/BKT then it has to be funded from somewhere. Who are the private bankroll investors and how much have they actually invested? Has that diluted your shareholding/ownership?
There is confusion because there is a contradiction. On one hand you say you have no interest in making a profit from the website and also you would close it after the last token was refunded yet you said it is privately funded. Can you elaborate because if $2 million worth of tokens were outstanding and only $44,000 was recently refunded (or brought back in the sale), how do you intend to make all token holders whole again? Do you have $2 million worth of investment to pay all those funds back if token holders try to sell them back to you?