Owners of GTX 1070, what is your hashrate?

[MHB]

Just a heads up, I've noticed that many people say +500 or +600 or even +700 for their memory OC which is subjective depending on your system settings. Sort of learnt this the hard way:

In CUDA / compute tasks, a stock GTX 1070 runs memory at 7600 MHz (base 3800*2). So a +600 OC will result in (base 3800+600)*2 = 8800 MHz. In 3D tasks, this same +600 OC will result in (base 4004+600)*2 = 9208 MHz, which can be unstable /crash the system.

You can use Nvidia Profile Inspector to set "Force Cuda P2 State" to "OFF". This prevents the base memory clock from dropping to P2 state while mining (keeping it in P0). Result: +500MHz memory OC gets you to 9GHz in BOTH gaming and CUDA/compute tasks, which should be safe for most.

[1714842785]

1714842785

[1714842785]

1714842785

[1eth1]

Gigabyte 1070 overclocked 80% powerlimit
CryptoNight - 750-760 - xmr-stak
Ethash - 32-33 - Claymore
Equhash - 450-460 - ZM
Lyra - 33 - ccminer

[cryptobengal]

Yeah im getting like most everybody else 31.5 on duel claymore. running real cool and very constant, using msi afterburner overclocking about 1797 over 4394 mhz   power limit -75   temp- limit- 72 they stay around 61c in my basment -core clock- +129  memory clock-+594  its been running stable for me at these settings, when i try to bump it up , i get a lot of errors. im not a pro at mining , i am just a beginner , but its fun..cheers

[jaideep10002]

we bought over 500 1070s for our mining farm.

Hashrate figures are as follows

Inno3D 1070 HerculeZ = 31 Mhs
Galax GTX 1070 Katana = 31.2 Mhs

The Katana cards are very compact(single slot) and you can put them close together and put a couple 120mm fans and they run nicely.

[Larz952002]

Thanks for all the responses everyone.  Its nice when a group can come together to ensure that everyone can get the best hash out of the cards that they have

[wetblanket]

Asus Rog Strix 1070 (8G model) with dstm `zm` miner, I'm seeing 485-495 sols/s mining zclassic. 6 of them:

Code:

2018-01-01 08:50:51 PM|   GPU0  46C  Sol/s: 488.2  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 489.8  I/s: 262.4  Sh: 1.15   1.00 211 ++
2018-01-01 08:50:53 PM|   GPU1  52C  Sol/s: 480.5  Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 483.6  I/s: 259.3  Sh: 1.14   1.00 212
2018-01-01 08:50:56 PM|   GPU3  40C  Sol/s: 492.2  Sol/W: 3.63  Avg: 488.5  I/s: 261.8  Sh: 1.19   1.00 215
2018-01-01 08:50:57 PM|   GPU4  58C  Sol/s: 493.3  Sol/W: 3.62  Avg: 487.2  I/s: 261.1  Sh: 1.26   0.99 213 +
2018-01-01 08:51:07 PM|   GPU5  57C  Sol/s: 485.9  Sol/W: 3.62  Avg: 487.1  I/s: 261.0  Sh: 1.20   0.99 234
2018-01-01 08:51:07 PM|   ========== Sol/s: 2924.4 Sol/W: 3.62  Avg: 2922.5 I/s: 1565.7 Sh: 7.15   1.00 217

dstm zm miner has a 2% fee, but I feel (but maybe I'm wrong?) that the increase in hashrate is worth it.

[100percent]

Ethash Claymore:
6 cards at 26-31
6 cards at 21-25 -> still don't know why these 6 are slower: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2663376.0

[adrianTNT]

Can someone tell me what CCminer version to get for GTX 1070 cards with Ubuntu ?

There are many links pointing in different directions, many modified source codes and forks, outdated versions, it is confusing as hell.

[MarkSinn]

my mh power with gtx 1070 is 28

[wetblanket]

Can someone tell me what CCminer version to get for GTX 1070 cards with Ubuntu ?

There are many links pointing in different directions, many modified source codes and forks, outdated versions, it is confusing as hell.

Depends on what algorithm you want to mine. For equihash, take a look and compare the following:

• tpruvot's fork of ccminer seems to be the most active ccminer fork that I've seen; of course ccminer handles multiple algorithms, which is handy
• ewbf is a custom equihash miner, hasn't been updated in a while
• dstm is a custom equihash miner, actively maintained and is more recent and hashes faster than ewbf
• bminer is a custom equihash miner, actively maintained and is more recent and hashes faster than both ewbf and dstm (marginally so for dstm, but still)

All three have devfees and can be disabled, usually with a performance decrease (CPU/GPU optimizations are disabled).

[newmz]

No..directly on the motherboard.At this moment, no monitor is connected to the rig.i use real vnc.

I know this is a pretty old post, but one possibility I thought of in your situation is (if you are using Windows at least) raise the virtual memory up to more than the total of VRAM on all the cards installed, so for example I have one rig which is 5 x 1070's which are all 8GB VRAM each, so my virtual memory is set to 48GB.

I had a similar situation to the one you described but it was on a 1060 rig and it was the card which was running the display - so I switched to the Core i5 onboard graphics for display and then the 1060 in the first slot improved.

[AngelSky]

No..directly on the motherboard.At this moment, no monitor is connected to the rig.i use real vnc.

I know this is a pretty old post, but one possibility I thought of in your situation is (if you are using Windows at least) raise the virtual memory up to more than the total of VRAM on all the cards installed, so for example I have one rig which is 5 x 1070's which are all 8GB VRAM each, so my virtual memory is set to 48GB.

I had a similar situation to the one you described but it was on a 1060 rig and it was the card which was running the display - so I switched to the Core i5 onboard graphics for display and then the 1060 in the first slot improved.

If he have dashboard link of the concern pool link alone he connected. He can get the details whether it is mining or not in the mobile itself. I am not sure why you are explaining about the virtual memory usage with the 1070 cards.
I don't understand why he is doing this. However, this is works better for the people whoever want to use the virtual RAM.

[Erba]

i got 8 x Gigabyte GTX1070 gaming G1 v.2.0 running on win10 on an Asrock H110 BTC PRO+.
Dunno about the other algorythms but with ccminer KlausT v 8.18 CUDA 9.1 and afterburner set to Core +50 (1700), MEM +200 (4000) Power 80% i'm getting
Hashrates of between 960 kH/s and 1130 kH/s, average 1060 kH/s per card with Neoscrypt.
Cards running at 57C with standard manual fan profile.
Virtual mem of 102400 Mb (i think it's overkill but got nothing else to fill the hdd with anyways)

[shater]

31.5MH/s single mining Ethereum ETH.

[kasparpalgi]

Inno3D 1070 HerculeZ = 31 Mhs
Galax GTX 1070 Katana = 31.2 Mhs

Are these Inno3D and Galax ones reliable? I've been told you should prefer ASUS, Gigabyte and Sapphire and maybe also Zotac. I know where to get good priced Inno3D 1070ti but I've been suspicious about that manufacturer.

[TeamCyr]

Can someone please help me out?

Its been two months I am trying to get on Neoscrypt with my 7 x GTX 1070 rig, but every time I give up after hours and hours of trying. (Im tired of low profits on Equihash  so I need to switch algos)

I can never get over 720 per card from a single GTX1070 which is terrible I get only 5000 kH/s from my 7 GTX 1070 rig. I should get at least 7700.

HSRMiner doesnt download it says virus detected.

CUDAMiner from this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.0 is just one exe file and missing dll files and doesnt run.

Neoscrypt Miner has very  low hashrates.

Klaust-T has low hashrates.

ccminer 2.2.3 Cuda gives me low hashrates.

https://imgur.com/a/k5tnF


It may be my MSI after burner settings?

Power Limit 75%
Core 122%
Memory 594%

[JustinJX]

For Ethhash and Equihash, this is what I did
1. Push the memory clock up until it becomes unstable, and use the highest stable setting.
2. Using the highest stable memory clock setting, push the core clock up until it becomes unstable.

Test it on Neoscrypt after that to ensure system is stable. Equihash is most friendly. So, I tend to do the optimization on Ethhash, then test the same result for stability on Neoscrypt. If its stable on Ethhash and Neoscrypt, it is highly likely to be stable on Equihash.

I'm mining on Nicehash, only switching between the 3 main algo. It usually runs on Equihash.

On Afterburner, I've pushed Samsung ram up to +775. I've pushed Micron ram on Aorus up to +775 as well. However, Micron ram on MSI Gaming X only goes up to +625. The absolute mem clock speed on MSI Gaming X will be about 9Ghz while the rest are clocking above that.

Core clock from 0 to +175. Aorus 0. MSI Gaming X +25.

MSI Gaming X, eventhough the card is real solid, the power consumption is higher and overclocking potential is limited compared to Gigabyte Windforce/G1/Aorus.

I've un-link power limit and temperature limit. My temp limit is 68dC and card will throttle down when temp reach 65dC which is my ideal max temp.
I'm also running a custom fan curve that holds the temperature around 60dC or lower while not being too loud.
Just play with it, the GPU will generate a certain amount of heat given a certain amount of work it is required to perform, you can turn your fan speed all the way up to keep it really cool but it creates a lot more noise for a limited amount of temperature decrease. Find out where the temp likes to settle and adjust the fan speed to hold it there.

GPU spacing is also very important, if you space them really tight then the rig will run a lot hotter.

At the moment I don't have any extra fans on my rig.

I'm very new to this gig, less than a month, I approached this scientifically and spent the first 2 week optimizing the system and testing ideas.

Read up about Marginal Diminishing Return.

[PetrovichCoinMaster]

I have an Asus 1070. It's performance on Ethereum is 33 Mh/s, zcash is 470 sol/s.

[oni4an]

My video cards  8 gtx 1070's at 31,2 mh/s mining Ethereum -67 on core +605 on memory aan 70%  running 65-70 degrees 1000 watts for the entire rig. I think if the prices will decrease to increase the quantity to 12, always dreamed Saddle big farm))

[miner916]

Hey all,

Just finished up my first mining rig ((3) 1070's) yesterday and have been doing the best I can with the OC settings.

Adding either 3 more 1070's or may buy 3 1080's when GPU's are back in stock.

Currently averaging around 1440 sol/s mining Zcash (between 1400 - 1450 sol/s) which is about 480 sol/s for each GPU.



Rig:

(3) EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 SC GAMING ACX 3.0, 8GB GDDR5

-- OC settings: (MSIAfterburner)  112 Power, 90 core, 680 mem  -  for all 3 GPU's  -  pulling 610 watts (about 200 watts per GPU)

-- Temps between 55-60c and fans on auto

(2) EVGA SuperNOVA 850 G 80 Plus Gold

ASUS PRIME Z270-A motherboard

8g of Corsair Vengeance DDR4 memory

Intel G3930 processor

Windows 10

Using ZEC Miner EWBF on the us1 flypool server

The first GPU only pulls about 440 sol/s and the other two GPU's are pulling around 480 sol/s each. Not sure why that is... Anyone know why?


Let me know what you guys think or if you have any suggestions. I have played around with the OC settings quite a bit and have found this to be the sweet spot for now, but definitely open to suggestions.

Every now and then I'll get a rejected share, is that normal? I've looked around and some people have said it is. I've read its a stale share due to a new block updating to the network.


PS: I'm not paying for power where this rig is stored so decreasing the power limit isn't a big factor in the equation.


Just looking for more opinions or insight.


Thanks,

Brandon