No fork detected--> Segwit is now active UASF is active! WE did it!

[Quantus]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

[BINAYKR]

So you mean to say that Bitcoin will not split and we can't get Bitcoin Cash or something like this.

[BitcoinBarrel]

So you mean to say that Bitcoin will not split and we can't get Bitcoin Cash or something like this.

Bitcoin Cash is something different and not happening for a few more hours.

[keithers]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

To be honest I'm intrigued by all the talk of bitcoin cash, but me personally, I was/am hoping for no fork. I want to have just one form of bitcoin. I would obviously like it to scale so that transactions aren't so laggy and expensive, but I feel that if there are multiple forms of bitcoin, it is going to make the entry barrier even more difficult for the novice. They will have no idea which to buy or what they are buying.

[Quantus]

BitmainCash is completely unrelated to bitcoin, segwit and UASF.

[Lutpin]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

http://segwit.co/
Not yet. Soon, yes. But SegWit isn't quite activated (or locked in) yet.
It's gonna happen though, only a matter of time (we already knew that after BIP91 activated).

[Wendigo]

BitmainCash is completely unrelated to bitcoin.

How so?

[Quantus]

BitmainCash is completely unrelated to bitcoin.

How so?

My understanding is if miners try to make a non segwit block now a fork would happen; it could happen at any moment but so far so good.

As far as BitmainCash thats just an altcoin. That has nothing to do with the Bitcoin network upgrade.

So regardless of what happens with BitmainCash in about 5 hours we have already succeeded in upgrading the network.  

[virtual_miner]

https://coin.dance

[NUFCrichard]

I'm sure BitcoinCash will plan to use fork/UAHF on 12.30 today which will happen in few hours and even forum news said that
I just hope BitcoinCash price will crash hard to the point where no one even bother to invest on that altcoin.

I assume you are a Bitcoin holder, so you will be a BCC holder too in a few hours.
You can support BCC or not, that is your prerogative, but why you want your new coins to be worth as little as possible is a bit strange, and sounds like spite.

If BCC trades at 20% or so, which I find unlikely, I will be overjoyed and sell at least most of my BCC.  If it is dumped and trades at 1%, I will hold.  There is always the chance that Segwit has flaws or that the 2mb blocksize is rejected in a few months, and BCC will become more relevant again.

[LouVandetta]

Just wait for a few more hours for BitcoinCash and we'll see about that.

And the people who support it and not, well what can we say?.
They have the right to choose whichever they want to.

Edit: 6 hours left, huh, until Bitcoin Cash Hardfork.  

[Schuyler]

It’s only a matter of time before we find out if bitcoin cash can have the support it wishes it had. Sure, there’s potential for it to trade higher than expected, but it can only go as far if there’s ample support / demand for it. If it’s not going to cause anybody any harm, holding bitcoin cash for a while but prove to be beneficial.

[mindrust]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

Better yet, we made them fork off .

UASF was a win/win for bitcoin. We activated segwit and we got rid of most of Jihan shills at the same time. Amazing results.

If this mining centralization continues like this, we'll have to bring mining back to home users.

[Simple8.1]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

To be honest I'm intrigued by all the talk of bitcoin cash, but me personally, I was/am hoping for no fork. I want to have just one form of bitcoin. I would obviously like it to scale so that transactions aren't so laggy and expensive, but I feel that if there are multiple forms of bitcoin, it is going to make the entry barrier even more difficult for the novice. They will have no idea which to buy or what they are buying.

Exactly! and how will the media interpret the fork-coin. Which one is the real BTC for simply buyers? It will raise sooooo many questions.

[xFiber]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

To be honest I'm intrigued by all the talk of bitcoin cash, but me personally, I was/am hoping for no fork. I want to have just one form of bitcoin. I would obviously like it to scale so that transactions aren't so laggy and expensive, but I feel that if there are multiple forms of bitcoin, it is going to make the entry barrier even more difficult for the novice. They will have no idea which to buy or what they are buying.

Exactly! and how will the media interpret the fork-coin. Which one is the real BTC for simply buyers? It will raise sooooo many questions.

Yes that was my issue with it at first as well. The fork will certainly cause confusion and media will pick it up for sure. It's unfortunate but I think it will only delay the time before novices start utilizing bitcoin.

[Quantus]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

To be honest I'm intrigued by all the talk of bitcoin cash, but me personally, I was/am hoping for no fork. I want to have just one form of bitcoin. I would obviously like it to scale so that transactions aren't so laggy and expensive, but I feel that if there are multiple forms of bitcoin, it is going to make the entry barrier even more difficult for the novice. They will have no idea which to buy or what they are buying.

Exactly! and how will the media interpret the fork-coin. Which one is the real BTC for simply buyers? It will raise sooooo many questions.

Unfortunately the whole point behind BitmainCash was to sucker and scam people. They (Bitmain) can pawn BitmainCash off to Venture capitalist investment financiers of large hedge funds who don't understand what they are buying and lilky would't care even if they did because they only want something that looks good on a 'prospectus' that they can then use to raise even more money.

[crazyivan]

I'm sure BitcoinCash will plan to use fork/UAHF on 12.30 today which will happen in few hours and even forum news said that
I just hope BitcoinCash price will crash hard to the point where no one even bother to invest on that altcoin.

I assume you are a Bitcoin holder, so you will be a BCC holder too in a few hours.
You can support BCC or not, that is your prerogative, but why you want your new coins to be worth as little as possible is a bit strange, and sounds like spite.

If BCC trades at 20% or so, which I find unlikely, I will be overjoyed and sell at least most of my BCC.  If it is dumped and trades at 1%, I will hold.  There is always the chance that Segwit has flaws or that the 2mb blocksize is rejected in a few months, and BCC will become more relevant again.

I expect BCC to be at 5% BTC price withing hours after introduction. I really do not understand how a free coin, which brings absolutely nothing to the table could be worth anything after the initial fuzz. Who will buy this and keep buying it and for what purpose?

[JorisK]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

Nonense.

Segwit still needs to lock in, will be active at the end of the month.

[Wendigo]

The purpose of BCC and the longest chain is yet to be decided even though based on the sentiment of the Bitcoin community it might be obvious which team has most support right now. But a few years from now? We are no fortune tellers right?

[Quantus]

UASF is being enforced Segwit is now active and no fork is detected!

Nonense.

Segwit still needs to lock in, will be active at the end of the month.

UASF is active tho so if any miner tries to make a non segwit block at any time a fork would happen. Right?
No block will be allowed to propagate across the network unless its signaling for segwit.  Right?

If I'm wrong on this I'm sorry for spreading miss information but that was my understanding of the situation.