Strange comparison, according to the table for payments via NiceHash you have taken into account only 6 days (8/19 - 8/25), while Zpool 9 days (8/19 - 8/28) and 3 payment.
It is also not clear why you did not publish the results on Friday (9/01) when Nicehash pays? You would have eventually happened the same data (9 deys).
NiceHash: 0,0263393 / 6 days = ~ 0.0043 / day
Zpool: 0,03225614 / 9 days = ~ 0.0035 / day
Or I not correctly think?
Even if you did not have enough amount to output, this does not mean that, the coins are lost, they will be in any case paid.
All test were stopped at the same time. The reason why you saw last payment for Nicehash on Friday is because that is the date of when the payout meets the minimum threshold for external wallets.
Zpool payouts are on Sundays for leftover balances, that does not mean that it was mining all the way till Sunday. As I mention, all test were stopped at the same time once Nicehash paid out to external wallet.
Posting results on Friday would not be the same data, because Zpool still has to process/exchange their coins. Nicehash pays PPS, which is why their BTC earn is instant.
just wondering can you tell if mph miner did switch to quark or qubit or it was mining x11 only, you can see history.
I did see it mining on qubit, not sure about quark, because didn't check all the time.
Yeah, not really a fair comparison. You should at least have used the local NiceHash wallet so that there would be daily payouts.
This is as fair as it gets, trust me. My goal was to find out which one is the most profitable for my Baikals and to share my results.
Also, it wouldnt matter if it was external wallet or local Nicehash wallet. There's about a $25 difference between nicehash and zpool in a week of mining, so you are saying by not using a local wallet, there would be $25 worth of nicehash fee's? If so, ouch!