cloudsito
|
|
August 27, 2017, 01:50:43 AM |
|
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount Do you think that this is not enough for such a period? The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount
|
|
|
|
gidi521
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 27, 2017, 01:51:32 AM |
|
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount Do you think that this is not enough for such a period? The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
August 27, 2017, 01:52:23 AM |
|
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount Do you think that this is not enough for such a period? The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed I think there can still be an element of randomness here. A large investor may not immediately come across this project
|
|
|
|
CryptoFanboy
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:04:40 AM |
|
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount Do you think that this is not enough for such a period? The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed I think there can still be an element of randomness here. A large investor may not immediately come across this project What kind of randomness can there be, if the money is at stake?
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:04:53 AM |
|
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
gidi521
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:05:56 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
|
|
|
|
cloudsito
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:08:26 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:10:11 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:14:16 AM |
|
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
gidi521
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:18:50 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers The lawyers definitely miss this team ...
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:19:48 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers The lawyers definitely miss this team ... Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform?
|
|
|
|
cloudsito
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:20:37 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers The lawyers definitely miss this team ... Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform? At a minimum, this would demonstrate the integrity of the development team
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:21:51 AM |
|
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
CryptoFanboy
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:22:13 AM |
|
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers The lawyers definitely miss this team ... Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform? Any project related to crypto currency needs lawyers
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:43:04 AM |
|
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
|
|
|
|
gidi521
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:47:55 AM |
|
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
In any case, anonymity on the Internet is always only relative
|
|
|
|
cloudsito
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:48:54 AM |
|
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
In any case, anonymity on the Internet is always only relative What do you mean?
|
|
|
|
CryptoFanboy
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:54:51 AM |
|
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
In any case, anonymity on the Internet is always only relative What do you mean? I think, the fact that platforms provide only opportunities to preserve anonymity. To use them or not, this is decided by the user
|
|
|
|
gidi521
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:57:13 AM |
|
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
In any case, anonymity on the Internet is always only relative What do you mean? I think, the fact that platforms provide only opportunities to preserve anonymity. To use them or not, this is decided by the user Exactly. In this case, the client does not need to name his real name or show documents in order to remain anonymous
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
August 27, 2017, 02:58:05 AM |
|
Then this system is not suitable for actors or politicians, for all those people know in person
|
|
|
|
|