I dont know that everyone agrees with that. However, I feel like thats the first response that makes a little sense to me. IF one feels it is truly in the greater good for the rollback to happen, then I can see why it would be supported. I supposed I am just confused about whether this is the Wild West or Wall Street.
Break it down simpler. We have two sides fighting, but we all can agree on one thing, the person/s who stole the coins is THE MOST at fault. Gox, is second at fault. Better security, blah blah blah, I can easily attribute that to "Every single user took that risk when they signed up"..... but no one, not one fucking person signed up to be fucked over by a hacker.
Gambling is one thing, fixing the game, well, fuck that. All sides should agree, that the person/s who stole the coins need to be held the most responsible.
I agree that getting mad at a parent (Gox) if their kid turns out to be a murderer (h4x0rz), is easy to do, but in the end, wrong.
Even even simpler, we are the whole class, and we are all being fucked because one person (h4x0rz) decided to throw a paper airplane at teacher (Gox).
Also, the teacher looks like this:
Sorry, growing tired of these analogies and bullshit. It fucking sucks for everybody, there are no rules written about this situation, no 'right or wrong' .. just the ability to step out of your shoes for a second and go 'okay, this is the best decision for most people involved'