Is it right to accuse someone even if there's not enough proof?
Lets put this situation in your shoes..
You know that you dont have enough evidences to prove someone that he/she guilty and that most of your conclusions are just opinionated ideas that you've come up with. Will you still push on? Will you still force your ideas into the crime? Tricking every person and making them think that your ideas are facts?
I think that would be wrong on so many levels. I mean, we all have right on opinion, but that does not mean it is true. Sometime people are so focused on something that they are unable to see whole picture. And with that comes many problems. Being objective about somethings are really hard, but in some cases we need to give our best to achieve that objectivity.