 |
August 06, 2017, 06:56:39 PM |
|
They don't open-source or even disclose the algorithm by which the secret is used to generate the outcome. So you just have to take their word for it that secret X results in outcome Y. So the system does NOTHING to show that the game is fair. They can change the outcome however they like, and then lie and say that the secret generated that outcome, and no one would be able to tell that they lied.
I'm down 300 units on 700 spins of roulette This is almost exactly two standard deviations below expectation. Softswiss could easily rig their systems so that almost everyone ends up two standard deviations below expectation, and then switch the game to be fair before anybody collects enough statistical proof. I saw a similar phenomenon on bovada, where you always get crushed at first, and then it starts to level out before the anomaly goes much beyond 2 standard deviations. That is how an intelligent game rigger would rig their shit. 99% of players don't play enough to get to the phase where the game is actually fair, so the riggers would make almost as much money as if the game was consistently 60% RTP.
|
Poll
