Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2017, 06:58:27 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: UASF coin failed, but how about a real LukeCoin?  (Read 180 times)
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672


View Profile
August 07, 2017, 07:00:09 PM
 #1

Big Blockers have their own coin now called Bitcoin Cash.

But this guy is extreme as well and should create his own coin now, otherwise this toxic ideas breakes bitcoin finally.

Small blocks and PoW change, go ahead Luke, "the community" will follow and the good thing, you can mine yourself, hows that?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6s73q3/luke_dashjr_the_1_reason_segwit2x_will_fail_is/

Should we call that Bitcoin Luck?

Carpe diem  -  cut the down side  -  be anti-fragile
A feature that needs more than one convincing argument is no and Satoshi owes me no proof.
My coding style is legendary but limited to 1MB, sorry but cannot come much over my C64, Bill Gates and Tom Bombadil
1513321107
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513321107

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513321107
Reply with quote  #2

1513321107
Report to moderator
1513321107
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513321107

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513321107
Reply with quote  #2

1513321107
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Iranus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
August 07, 2017, 07:16:34 PM
 #2

"UASF coin" does not exist, because UASF did not cause a chain split.  Come to think of it, since BIP 91 will soon achieve UASF's objective (to activate SegWit), you could argue that the main chain is the UASF coin.

As for PoW changes, that would just be a hard fork like BCH, and though we don't know how popular it would be, we know that we could just choose to use the old chain if necessary.

Luke does seem to be a tad mental in that he was OK with UASF potentially causing a chain split (the only reason it didn't is the miners being promised a 2MB hard fork), but he is opposed to basically any other chain splits on the grounds of consensus.  He seems to assume that consensus is following whatever his view is at the time.

hatshepsut93
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


YOLOdice.com - fast, fair, play/invest.


View Profile
August 07, 2017, 07:34:59 PM
 #3

Big Blockers have their own coin now called Bitcoin Cash.

But this guy is extreme as well and should create his own coin now, otherwise this toxic ideas breakes bitcoin finally.

Small blocks and PoW change, go ahead Luke, "the community" will follow and the good thing, you can mine yourself, hows that?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6s73q3/luke_dashjr_the_1_reason_segwit2x_will_fail_is/

Should we call that Bitcoin Luck?

You (big blockers) can all other chains whatever you want in your pathetic attempt to scam newbies, but it's a matter of fact fact that todays economic majority of Bitcoin users runs Core software, and there are no reasons to believe that they will switch to Garzik's software in November. In crypto world, users shows their trust in dev teams by trading coins on free markets. Bcash failed to drop Bitcoin's price, meaning no one lost confidence in Core so far.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!