Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 06:11:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: How many USB Device on a single system ?  (Read 3043 times)
squall1066
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1032


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 09:05:41 PM
 #21

I would like to nail a common miss-conception here about processors/memory/speed.

I have had 54 units on 3 hubs running on a p4 2.8Ghz (skt 775) with 2x512 MB memory (DDR2) on PCLINUXOS with a 20GB IDE drive.

All is sweet, CPU hangs around 2-3% usage, I have no idea why people are throwing money at "I" core systems with vasts amount of memory and HDD space.

If it a stand alone miner and you leave it as such, You can use dated hardware and save $$$
razorfishsl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 399
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 12, 2013, 11:13:35 PM
 #22

All on Intel Nuc Core i3



That is OSX.. lets see the 'activity monitor' and a double click on the "CPU usage"

High Quality USB Hubs for Bitcoin miners
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560003
Charles999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:45:02 PM
 #23

I'm thinking I can get atleast 100 on a machine easily.  I just need a usb hub that supports that.  There are a few out there, but it's pricy.  better to buy some smaller and just daisy chain it.
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 04:02:23 PM
 #24

That is OSX.. lets see the 'activity monitor' and a double click on the "CPU usage"
Really?? The screenshot is of OSX, but he's blatantly using TeamViewer to remote into a Windows8 machine that's running 8 instances of CGMiner 3.1.1 to run 76 devices. And that Intel NUC is a 4"x4" little box with a dual-core 1.8GHz CPU. Not exactly beefy.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
tom_o
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 07:53:05 PM
 #25

I would like to nail a common miss-conception here about processors/memory/speed.

I have had 54 units on 3 hubs running on a p4 2.8Ghz (skt 775) with 2x512 MB memory (DDR2) on PCLINUXOS with a 20GB IDE drive.

All is sweet, CPU hangs around 2-3% usage, I have no idea why people are throwing money at "I" core systems with vasts amount of memory and HDD space.

If it a stand alone miner and you leave it as such, You can use dated hardware and save $$$

I know what you mean, my 'rig' has a single 4GB stick of DDR3, and a old i3 530 with one core disable and the other down-clocked to 1.3GHz and 1.05v! Doesn't even need a fan on it and stays around 50*C!
razorfishsl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 399
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2013, 12:45:14 AM
 #26

That is OSX.. lets see the 'activity monitor' and a double click on the "CPU usage"
Really?? The screenshot is of OSX, but he's blatantly using TeamViewer to remote into a Windows8 machine that's running 8 instances of CGMiner 3.1.1 to run 76 devices. And that Intel NUC is a 4"x4" little box with a dual-core 1.8GHz CPU. Not exactly beefy.

Sorry I imbued him with a little too much intelligence....

Seems you can get osx running on that intel stack.... with a few hacks, I initially thought he had gone that route.


Anyway .... whilst we are on the number of USB devices

Spotted another serious flaw with trying to 'tree up' a USB port to its maximum.. (actually it was my cat that found it)
A defective plug on a USB cable, allowed the cable to operate out of spec and in doing so took down a section of my miner network
(fortunately i'm on multiple controllers)... unfortunately it also burned out an ATX PSU

So maybe that is an argument for multiple cheap computers....

High Quality USB Hubs for Bitcoin miners
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560003
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!