myrkul
|
|
May 18, 2013, 07:05:18 AM |
|
There's a big difference between protecting people from something and recognizing that it is wrong and people who do it should be punished.
For instance, in a libertarian society, people would probably still go armed, even though initiation of force is wrong. Should someone initiate the use of force, they will suffer the consequences, but it's not wise to rely only on those consequences to protect yourself.
Just like it's silly to rely only on the consequences of being caught at fraud to protect you from fraud. Due diligence is the equivalent of carrying a pistol for self-protection.
|