[Overview of all bitcoin casinos] Latest update: 14-03-19 VISIT NEW WEBSITE

[Josepht]

Hey

Just wants to let everyone know that max win profit in a single bet on Yolodice is around 14.6 btc at this very moment.
Also Yolodice have two jackpots of its own kind. Also have rakeback of max upto 30% as well as referral of 20% and zero second delay on bets above 10 satoshi. Which are unique in itself. So according to me Yolodice deserves more rating than the rating atm. 

Hey Mooonu,

Thanks for your input. I do agree with you that YoloDice has some pretty good features. They do deserve a high rating.
When looking at the rating, they already have the second highest rating, so I am tempted to let them stay where they are.
However, if users have very good (or bad) experiences playing on a site, I take that in concideration, so I'll give them a raise.

Always happy with any feedback.

[1714785875]

1714785875

[1714785875]

1714785875

[1714785875]

1714785875

[1714785875]

1714785875

[1714785875]

1714785875

[moooonu]

One more thing. I visited zoomdice a day earlier and I can see that there are a few altcoins added to the site. Maybe you wanna have a look there and update it in your list.

[DogecoinMachine]

Hey

Just wants to let everyone know that max win profit in a single bet on Yolodice is around 14.6 btc at this very moment.
Also Yolodice have two jackpots of its own kind. Also have rakeback of max upto 30% as well as referral of 20% and zero second delay on bets above 10 satoshi. Which are unique in itself. So according to me Yolodice deserves more rating than the rating atm.  

Hey Mooonu,

Thanks for your input. I do agree with you that YoloDice has some pretty good features. They do deserve a high rating.
When looking at the rating, they already have the second highest rating, so I am tempted to let them stay where they are.
However, if users have very good (or bad) experiences playing on a site, I take that in concideration, so I'll give them a raise.

Always happy with any feedback.

Having a rakeback is practicaly the same as having lower house edge Giving players so high max bet with low bankroll is playing with fire imo. At the end the investors are the ones who'll lose.

Maybe you can add in table referral commission percentages.

[Josepht]

Having a rakeback is practicaly the same as having lower house edge Giving players so high max bet with low bankroll is playing with fire imo. At the end the investors are the ones who'll lose.

Maybe you can add in table referral commission percentages.

1. Agreed, rakeback is the same as lower house edge.
2. Are you talking about yolodice? Their max win is 14,6 BTC, with an effective bankroll of 5420 BTC, so it's only 0,27% of the effective bankroll. That's not much, as I know sites who allow 1% of the bankroll as max win.
And at the end, the investors will not lose, because the house edge is still there, so they'll make a profit.

Or didn't I understand you, and did you mean something else?

3. I don't think refferal commission persentages matter for the players, so I don't think it's needed to include it to the list.

[DogecoinMachine]

Having a rakeback is practicaly the same as having lower house edge Giving players so high max bet with low bankroll is playing with fire imo. At the end the investors are the ones who'll lose.

Maybe you can add in table referral commission percentages.

1. Agreed, rakeback is the same as lower house edge.
2. Are you talking about yolodice? Their max win is 14,6 BTC, with an effective bankroll of 5420 BTC, so it's only 0,27% of the effective bankroll. That's not much, as I know sites who allow 1% of the bankroll as max win.
And at the end, the investors will not lose, because the house edge is still there, so they'll make a profit.

Or didn't I understand you, and did you mean something else?

3. I don't think refferal commission persentages matter for the players, so I don't think it's needed to include it to the list.

Their actual bankroll is 586 BTC with max win 14.66 BTC, that 2.5% of bankroll which is way too high. How high is virtual bankroll doesn't really matter in the end...you can't pay players with "virtual" bitcoins. That's just my opinion btw.

[Josepht]

Having a rakeback is practicaly the same as having lower house edge Giving players so high max bet with low bankroll is playing with fire imo. At the end the investors are the ones who'll lose.

Maybe you can add in table referral commission percentages.

1. Agreed, rakeback is the same as lower house edge.
2. Are you talking about yolodice? Their max win is 14,6 BTC, with an effective bankroll of 5420 BTC, so it's only 0,27% of the effective bankroll. That's not much, as I know sites who allow 1% of the bankroll as max win.
And at the end, the investors will not lose, because the house edge is still there, so they'll make a profit.

Or didn't I understand you, and did you mean something else?

3. I don't think refferal commission persentages matter for the players, so I don't think it's needed to include it to the list.

Their actual bankroll is 586 BTC with max win 14.66 BTC, that 2.5% of bankroll which is way too high.

You're wrong here.

The bankroll is 5420 effective, because 534 BTC of the invested 586 BTC has a leverage of 10%. Those investors know that the swings in profit or loss will be higher, but in the end, they effectively invested more in the bankroll, so in the long run they will make more profit.

Investors also have the option to invest at 1% leverage, but most of the investors agree with a higher risk, higher reward option.

Basically what you're saying is that when someone invest 10x as much, they are more likely to lose money by investing. That makes no sense.

[DogecoinMachine]

Having a rakeback is practicaly the same as having lower house edge Giving players so high max bet with low bankroll is playing with fire imo. At the end the investors are the ones who'll lose.

Maybe you can add in table referral commission percentages.

1. Agreed, rakeback is the same as lower house edge.
2. Are you talking about yolodice? Their max win is 14,6 BTC, with an effective bankroll of 5420 BTC, so it's only 0,27% of the effective bankroll. That's not much, as I know sites who allow 1% of the bankroll as max win.
And at the end, the investors will not lose, because the house edge is still there, so they'll make a profit.

Or didn't I understand you, and did you mean something else?

3. I don't think refferal commission persentages matter for the players, so I don't think it's needed to include it to the list.

Their actual bankroll is 586 BTC with max win 14.66 BTC, that 2.5% of bankroll which is way too high.

You're wrong here.

The bankroll is 5420 effective, because 534 BTC of the invested 586 BTC has a leverage of 10%. Those investors know that the swings in profit or loss will be higher, but in the end, they effectively invested more in the bankroll, so in the long run they will make more profit.

Investors also have the option to invest at 1% leverage, but most of the investors agree with a higher risk, higher reward option.

Basically what you're saying is that when someone invest 10x as much, they are more likely to lose money by investing. That makes no sense.

So, when someone wins fe 600 BTC, how will they pay him...the bankroll at that time will be still 4800 BTC.

[Josepht]

So, when someone wins fe 600 BTC, how will they pay him?

That's not possible. Max win in one bet is 14.6 BTC. If that amount is won, the next max bet decreases naturally.

If you read their website, you would know that investors who invest with 10x leverage will lose their whole bankroll if 10% of the effective bankroll is lost.

For example:
If there are only 10 investors who all invest 1 BTC at 10x leverage, the effective bankroll is 100 BTC. As said before, if 10% of the effective bankroll is lost (10% of 100 BTC is 10 BTC), all investors have lost all their money. That makes sense, since the actual amount of BTC invested is 10 BTC. The investors are just taking more risk to gain more profit.

[DogecoinMachine]

So, when someone wins fe 600 BTC, how will they pay him?

That's not possible. Max win in one bet is 14.6 BTC. If that amount is won, the next max bet decreases naturally.

If you read their website, you would know that investors who invest with 10x leverage will lose their whole bankroll if 10% of the effective bankroll is lost.

For example:
If there are only 10 investors who all invest 1 BTC at 10x leverage, the effective bankroll is 100 BTC. As said before, if 10% of the effective bankroll is lost (10% of 100 BTC is 10 BTC), all investors have lost all their money. That makes sense, since the actual amount of BTC invested is 10 BTC. The investors are just taking more risk to gain more profit.

I admit, don't know the specifics of their calculations, but since the higher risk with leverages is much higer I was never a fan of it (and we never offered it on our website, probably never will )

[casinolize.com]

what is the procedure to add our site in your review list?

[Josepht]

what is the procedure to add our site in your review list?

There is no procedure. In a few days, I'll make an update to the list (you know, make sure all information is still correct). I'll also add you guys to the list.

[casinolize.com]

what is the procedure to add our site in your review list?

There is no procedure. In a few days, I'll make an update to the list (you know, make sure all information is still correct). I'll also add you guys to the list.

Thank your for the update.

[Josepht]

As of now, casinolize has been added to the dice list! They are currently new, and don't have high limits, but the house edge of 0.7% seems promecing compared to their competitors.
For gambles with a smaller bankroll, they seem interesting.

I have also updated the list with mostly max bets. They should be up to date now.

As always, if something is wrong or if you want to see something added, just PM me, or post here.

[tabas]

Wow that's a nice list, like those signature campaign's list. I didn't notice on August. Good to see that every casino is well summarized and detailed on the table. Thanks for this list mate.

[casinolize.com]

As of now, casinolize has been added to the dice list! They are currently new, and don't have high limits, but the house edge of 0.7% seems promecing compared to their competitors.
For gambles with a smaller bankroll, they seem interesting.

I have also updated the list with mostly max bets. They should be up to date now.

As always, if something is wrong or if you want to see something added, just PM me, or post here.

Thank you.  We are planning to implement few changes on our site by next week. After that we will pm you to correct those details.

[Josepht]

As of today, I have added to all dice sites wheter or not they are mobile friendly. Nowedays more and more people are gambling with their phone and/or tablet, so it is for sure handy to have that stat listed here.

Also, I am thinking about creating a website with the sites listed. The site will obviousely be more fancy than this list. If you guys are interested, please let me know.

Also, if new sites are around, don't forget to PM that to me (or post it here), so that I can update the list if necessary.

[casinolize.com]

Our site is responsive to mobile. But you have marked its not mobile friendly.. Please double check

[DogecoinMachine]

Not sure why you marked Crypto-Games.net as kind of mobile friendly

   

[Josepht]

Our site is responsive to mobile. But you have marked its not mobile friendly.. Please double check

That's right. It's not mobile friendly. The website shown is just the same website as the one in the PC browser. The creteria that I set was not about wheter or not the site is visible, but wheter or not you can bet easily on the website. That's not the case in your website.

Not sure why you marked Crypto-Games.net as kind of mobile friendly

-image- -image- -image-

You site is marked as kind of mobile friendly, since it's not fully mobile friendly, but neither horrible. The buttons are way to small to easily navige through the site. If you'd make all the buttons a little larger, I would put you in the 'good' cathegory.

[Josepht]

The cathegory Slots have been added. Ýou can check it out (together with the other games) in the OP.

Here is the list:



Slots

|	Name	|	Rating	|	Amount of games	|	Smoothness	|
|	FortuneJack	|	8.6/10	|	9/10	|	8/10	|
|	BetChain	|	8.4/10	|	9.5/10	|	6/10	|
|	CloudBet	|	8.4/10	|	9/10	|	7/10	|
|	BitStarz	|	8.2/10	|	9/10	|	5.5/10	|
|	BitDice	|	7/10	|	6/10	|	8/10	|
|	BetCoin	|	6/10	|	7/10	|	4.5/10	|
|	BitCasino	|	5.5/10	|	4/10	|	7.5/10	|

As always: any feedback is appreciated, and will be taken in concideration.