My Rep Trust Petition

[Deja]

x

[actmyname]

Trust feedback is not moderated and you will find that any and all attempts to have any 'higher power' put an end to the feedback will be in vain. Plus, there's no feasible way to prevent DT members from tagging your account unless you have them removed from the network outright [which is a difficult task]Where is this Ethereum address containing the $1.5M?

[Deja]

x

[Quickseller]

I find it highly ironic that lauda left you a negative rating for allegedly trying to blackmail him after his history of extortion.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Maybe you should address Lauda's accusation of blackmail.   I can't even see the image on the link Lauda peovided for some reason.

Set your expectations very low, because that trust score isn't likely to be changed.  And no, you are free as a bird to leave feedback as you see fit here.  No proof required--though you should be honest.

[Lauda]

I can't even see the image on the link Lauda peovided for some reason.

Take a look at the top image:

I'm still waiting for proof for these *alleged activities*.

[Yuuto]

There is no use whatsoever appealing to forum administrators. The trust system is based on opinion, and there are 5 DT members that think you are untrustworthy. Theymos will not remove these feedback just because you want him to.

IMO the main problem isn't about the ICO but rather your threats, and baseless accusations.

You shouldn't have accused of Lauda of being an alt of all the others in his Crypto Escrow Team, unless you have proof which you can post right here right now.

Plus i dont see a need for another shitcoin ico purely for the benefit of the devs

[Deja]

x

[GideonGono]

I can't even see the image on the link Lauda peovided for some reason.

Take a look at the top image:

I'm still waiting for proof for these *alleged activities*.

Well I see irony here. Deja is accusing you of being an alt account of whatever or whoever with no proof while on the other hand you painted him red with no proof but rather an accusation (but not speculation) though I would say it has its basis since it is suspicious like what others also stated wayback a time ago. Being all that said, the project is successful and had proven itself being real so I think that you guys who gave him a negative review are proven wrong then I think a man should learn to set aside their ego and correct the wrongs.

Anyway, if you still have any suspicions then Deja is willing to provide proofs, isn't he?

Also, you didn't paint him red because of that, isn't it? If it is a defamation then he shouldn't had pmed you but rather post it so everyone can see it.

[Lauda]

That accusation was retired and posts were deleted...

And you think that makes everything go away over night?

We apologize for that again and I believe you will make the correct decisión.

I am not doing anything until all other ratings are removed. Then, and only then I may think about removing (one of two at least).

Being all that said, the project is successful..

I don't see anything successful about it.

Also, you didn't paint him red because of that, isn't it? If it is a defamation then he shouldn't had pmed you but rather post it so everyone can see it.

I tagged him for two reasons: 1) Shady ICO (followed ibminer). 2) Blackmail.

[3x2]

I think one has to accept Crypto escrow team as mandatory official escrow for being exempted from red tagged. Wow this forum is really decentralised. 

[Lauda]

I think one has to accept Crypto escrow team as mandatory official escrow for being exempted from red tagged. Wow this forum is really decentralised. 

No project ever has been tagged for not using CET. Maybe we should take a look at your own backyard:

Trust summary for 3x2
This user's email address was changed recently.

[GideonGono]

Being all that said, the project is successful..

I don't see anything successful about it.

What is your definition of a successful project? As I can see it, the project has been launched successfully and been listed to some exchanger sites where its value is growing as well as the volume. Well, I don't mean success like they accomplished everything in their roadmap if you think so. If the project is launched successfully i.e. reaching their cap and distributed the tokens then I would consider it as a project that is successfully launched to be precise.

I tagged him for two reasons: 1) Shady ICO (followed ibminer).

I think he already proves that his project is not shady at all, isn't he? If still is shady, can you point those out?

2) Blackmail.

By how? Let's be specific. Or maybe this blackmail is just a trade of insults and accusations but nothing more which will deal real harm to you?

I think one has to accept Crypto escrow team as mandatory official escrow for being exempted from red tagged. Wow this forum is really decentralised.  

No project ever has been tagged for not using CET.

The fact is most likely you will get tagged for not using escrow especially if they think that your project is shady or what. There are campaigns out there who doesn't have escrow, don't they? 3x2 is just mocking you and other DT members who he thinks is acting all high though I can't say if it is true or not, what do you think?