Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 05:49:37 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Questions about PCI-E Speeds  (Read 628 times)
clvrtrvr (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 02:30:26 PM
 #1

Im building a simple setup to get started and the board I have already has 1 PCI-E x16 and the other is x4. Im probably going to pick up 2 gigabyte 7950's locally and was wondering if because they are both not x16, will it effect my Mhash/s rate? and is by how much?

Thanks in advance guys & gals! Grin
Coinagect
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 02:39:57 PM
 #2

In my experience you'll be ok, not a lot of data is passing along the channel

I have a x16 3.0 card plugged into the 1x slot
Craynon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 02:43:56 PM
 #3

It shouldn't affect it too much. It isn't really a data9intensive process, it's processor intensive instead. Data throughput isn't a big worry so long as the processor is up to the job
ccc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:10:17 PM
 #4

It doesn't matter at all for mining. I assume you have risers because that's the only way you'll be able to plug the card into a smaller slot.
DaGreatRV
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:12:31 PM
 #5

The main source of trafic is caused by stuff being written to the RAM of your videocard, from the rest of the system. (ie. textures in games)
Bitcoin does not use your VRAM so that's out of the way.
Litecoin does use your VRAM, but the data that's written is generated by your GPU.

As said here, 1x slot will do fine.
clvrtrvr (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 06:48:49 PM
 #6

thanks for the input guys. im just glad i don't have to go buy a new motherboard now lol. Just need a cheap 1155 chip now haha
clvrtrvr (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 06:53:05 PM
 #7

would any 1155 chip do? or should i get like an i5 or something. my main mining is GPU. not sure if it would use a little of the cpu or not
Caesium
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 06:53:54 PM
 #8

It'll use next to nothing - the cheapest CPU you can find that fits in the socket will be just fine.

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
clvrtrvr (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 06:57:09 PM
 #9

It'll use next to nothing - the cheapest CPU you can find that fits in the socket will be just fine.

thanks, just what i wanted to hear lol
boobies
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 07:27:19 PM
 #10

if you want to mine using the cpu as well to get a little extra, I've used pooler's miner on q6600 cpu's (old quad core) with 4 threads each getting ~7Kh/s (~28Kh/s total).

not bad for the cpu which would otherwise be sitting there idle.
Bitmong
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 10:04:14 PM
 #11

if you want to mine using the cpu as well to get a little extra, I've used pooler's miner on q6600 cpu's (old quad core) with 4 threads each getting ~7Kh/s (~28Kh/s total).

not bad for the cpu which would otherwise be sitting there idle.

Well, overall it is not likely worth it, because the CPU consumes more electricity when hashing and that electricity costs more than you earn with coins.
Blis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 11:14:57 PM
 #12

I just recently switched a 7950 to a PCI1x powered riser and am having problems getting it to run at full hashing power. I have however read of many others running multiple cards on pci 1x risers and never having an issue.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!