This could be interesting.. I have a few questions though.
According to your white paper, 70% of the subscription fee will be converted to Vertana for the use of their computational power on a monthly basis.
(... • Members collectively use their unused computing power and bandwidth to search for digitally fingerprinted video based content - in the similar way SETI1 ...)
Is this client specific ? Do you limit the number of "miners" who can support a client? OR is this based on the % computational power used irrespective of the number of users?
The second aspect is related to searching & identifying content:
Page 11 of the introductory white paper talks about how the client compensation of "miner/miners". Is this a non-subscription based approach?
Reason being, the fee paid by the subscriber should ideally cover the cost of identifying the pirated copies (70%)
Technically, digital watermarks can be erased - also this technology is constantly evolving . I understand that you are using an in-house solution - is this a patented steganographic solution? The fact that this is embedded this in the blockchain only helps the miners to identify it, but doesnt talk about the steganographic technology involved..which is critical.
As far as i know, you also need device manufacturers to agree to use this.
Just curious how that would play out.
On another note, apart from the subscriber solution, is this different from Custotech? see here:
https://custostech.com/Good luck!!
