|
bitekoin
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 10:18:05 AM |
|
Well, 5x might be a bit of a stretch. If you place importance to a good project with a good team and plan then you might want to check out RoboAdvisorCoin. See info here http://roboadvisorcoin.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.Stuart
|
|
November 22, 2017, 07:56:30 PM |
|
guys, what do you think about the gonetwork project? I plan to participate in this ICO, are there obvious disadvantages?
|
|
|
|
Tokentournament
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 22, 2017, 08:04:01 PM |
|
One of the best promising lending crypto of this end of the year, a decentralized hedge fund with bots and big ROI like bitconnect. May be a shitcoin but x10 guarenteed for christmas  The IDEACOIN ICO is on last round, 10 billions founded in 48h : https://ico.ideacoin.co/invite/Ideacoinfrenchuser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.Stuart
|
|
November 23, 2017, 07:26:29 AM |
|
I think Cindicator was the best
Best by far: Datum They already have hardware, working prototype, very active development, a whitelist, and KYC. www.Datum.orgboth of them are good. I like datum more but datum dev team is not enough to handle a large project like this. They dont have any experience before for this work I support your opinion on these projects, but the cindicator has already ended, but the datum is still going on |
|
|
|
marcio153
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
November 23, 2017, 08:37:32 AM
Last edit: November 23, 2017, 08:52:43 AM by marcio153 |
|
I really believe in RepuX ICO Great project, professional team, promising roadmap RepuX site
|
|
|
|
|
0kechuku
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
November 23, 2017, 10:10:01 PM |
|
To locate tutorials simply have searching using the tor browser after which there are lots of knowledge about darkish market segments.Do not established 1 up though it's certain to appeal to criminal activity which forces you to responsible for poor items that happens.
|
|
|
|
|
mohima1230
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2017, 09:21:50 PM |
|
Bankera ico will starts on 27th November, those who are interested to invest get prepared. The project will pay you weekly profit generating from there business. Don’t miss the opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SilverVigilante
|
|
November 24, 2017, 10:39:10 PM |
|
I think the best ICO in November was UTrust. For the moment it seems that the most money is summing it up. I think the project of UTrust is of good quality and I know that it has the potential to do good work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rancidgash
|
|
November 28, 2017, 12:40:02 PM |
|
October has passed long time ago, but on Friday starts presale of GIZER Tokens (GZR) - take a look, because in my opinion it is worth it!
GIZER tokens presale was swifted to 30th of November, so you still have few days to collect funds 
You also guys have to look on ALGORY project: https://algory.ioAnd here is announcement thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2414339.0Crowdsale is starting at 8th of December 2017 - 14:00 PM UTC |
|
|
|
|
Fr0styFIedgIing
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2017, 04:15:05 PM |
|
Bitcoin is the most transparent way to deliver funds directly to thin require. Bitcoin continues to be an incredible program of payment tht is easy, affordable,and quick.The real great thing about bitcoin system and every one of the cryptocurrencies constructed from it's its decentralization. Crypto currencies eventually become used for the buying and selling of everyday things.ae os
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.Stuart
|
|
November 29, 2017, 04:38:23 AM |
|
October has passed long time ago, but on Friday starts presale of GIZER Tokens (GZR) - take a look, because in my opinion it is worth it!
GIZER tokens presale was swifted to 30th of November, so you still have few days to collect funds
You also guys have to look on ALGORY project: https://algory.ioAnd here is announcement thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2414339.0Crowdsale is starting at 8th of December 2017 - 14:00 PM UTC what is so good algory you can explain to me? Does he have a strong development team? |
|
|
|
|
andromed22
|
|
November 29, 2017, 09:59:46 PM |
|
It has been a long time for this topic, but I guess this answer is obvious. The best ICO in October was Aventus. This is indisputable fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rancidgash
|
|
November 29, 2017, 10:29:49 PM |
|
October has passed long time ago, but on Friday starts presale of GIZER Tokens (GZR) - take a look, because in my opinion it is worth it!
GIZER tokens presale was swifted to 30th of November, so you still have few days to collect funds
You also guys have to look on ALGORY project: https://algory.ioAnd here is announcement thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2414339.0Crowdsale is starting at 8th of December 2017 - 14:00 PM UTC what is so good algory you can explain to me? Does he have a strong development team? It's hard to say whether the developers are a strong team - We will know about it soon. In my opinion it is a well organized project and a truly great idea. |
|
|
|
|
indika8821
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2017, 11:53:49 PM |
|
Rule of choose best ico
Rule # 1 - Choose the Right Sized Projects, focus on value and avoid projects with too much hype
When it comes to sizes, it appears that there is a "golden range" where projects are not too small and not too big. This range is statistically proven to be in the $2M to $10M. Don't forget that ICOs are start-ups in nature.
Google was founded in a garage and was later on funded with $1M USD. Generally if the project and the team are good, any raised amount in the range between $2M and $10M would be more than sufficient to build the project and to get to a point where they can make a proof of concept. And in the same sense if a project is bad or the team is made up of idiots, giving them $232 Million is not likely to solve any of the problems.
Don't forget that this is the initial funding that the company needs to deliver their project. Once they do, they should scale up their operating revenue according to the size of their business.
By eliminating hyped/over sized projects you eliminate a big amount of the "pump and dump" risk factors and a lot of the "noise". Not that smaller projects can't sell to whale investors, it's just that it is much less likely. You also lower the regulatory issues, because with big projects there are a lot more legal risks because they also attract more attention and have contributors from a much wider spectre.
In addition, team founders will not be incentivized to work towards improving their token value, because If they raise $232 Million before the project starts, then they would have already made a fortune that would definitely have an impact on their motivation and focus.
Rule # 2 - Analyze the team and make sure they are already successful
If the team founders don't have any other successful businesses - ditch them! Make sure the founders are business oriented. They must have proven already with other projects in order to be eligible for your money. Otherwise it would be something similar to throwing money at someone who has no idea on how to develop a business from scratch. Doing that will not make him learn how to do business. Also if they are successful, it would imply that they are not likely to commit any illegal stuff as they have a reputation and a life to lose.
By choosing a successful, experienced and business oriented founders team, you greatly increase your chance of success. This by itself is the most important value metric, but I place it at #2, simply because of the regulatory risk associated with #1 which can easily ruin a good project regardless of the founders experience.
Rule # 3 - Avoid projects with big "Dark periods" in their road-maps
The concept of ICO is to launch a cryptocurrency that would be useful and widely adopted. This is possible only through a service which should be innovative, disruptive and with high and immediate value to the retail users. Waiting 1 year to get an alpha version is not acceptable.
Ideally you should be able to get a feeling of the service during the ICO itself and be able to spend your tokens immediately after the end.
Rule # 4 - Make sure there is a reasonable Hardcap, any unsold tokens - destroyed and that there won't be any future offerings
With current abundance of ICOs it is becoming much more often that projects don't meet their hardcap. This is generally not a negative signal as long as the raised amount is over $2M, as like already mentioned, a group of smart people will perform better in the long term with $2M than a bunch of idiots with $232M.
This is why it is extremely important the token holder to destroy all unsold tokens immediately upon finalization of the tokensale. This will ensure that the supplied amount of tokens will be corresponding to the demand of the market and that its economy will be in balance.
Also making sure there won't be future offerings on the same token. This gives you protection against oversupply and this way the price can potentially go up as high as 500% - 1000% increase within a year.
Copied by fb post....
|
|
|
|
|
|
rancidgash
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:23:34 PM |
|
Rule of choose best ico
Rule # 1 - Choose the Right Sized Projects, focus on value and avoid projects with too much hype
When it comes to sizes, it appears that there is a "golden range" where projects are not too small and not too big. This range is statistically proven to be in the $2M to $10M. Don't forget that ICOs are start-ups in nature.
Google was founded in a garage and was later on funded with $1M USD. Generally if the project and the team are good, any raised amount in the range between $2M and $10M would be more than sufficient to build the project and to get to a point where they can make a proof of concept. And in the same sense if a project is bad or the team is made up of idiots, giving them $232 Million is not likely to solve any of the problems.
Don't forget that this is the initial funding that the company needs to deliver their project. Once they do, they should scale up their operating revenue according to the size of their business.
By eliminating hyped/over sized projects you eliminate a big amount of the "pump and dump" risk factors and a lot of the "noise". Not that smaller projects can't sell to whale investors, it's just that it is much less likely. You also lower the regulatory issues, because with big projects there are a lot more legal risks because they also attract more attention and have contributors from a much wider spectre.
In addition, team founders will not be incentivized to work towards improving their token value, because If they raise $232 Million before the project starts, then they would have already made a fortune that would definitely have an impact on their motivation and focus.
Rule # 2 - Analyze the team and make sure they are already successful
If the team founders don't have any other successful businesses - ditch them! Make sure the founders are business oriented. They must have proven already with other projects in order to be eligible for your money. Otherwise it would be something similar to throwing money at someone who has no idea on how to develop a business from scratch. Doing that will not make him learn how to do business. Also if they are successful, it would imply that they are not likely to commit any illegal stuff as they have a reputation and a life to lose.
By choosing a successful, experienced and business oriented founders team, you greatly increase your chance of success. This by itself is the most important value metric, but I place it at #2, simply because of the regulatory risk associated with #1 which can easily ruin a good project regardless of the founders experience.
Rule # 3 - Avoid projects with big "Dark periods" in their road-maps
The concept of ICO is to launch a cryptocurrency that would be useful and widely adopted. This is possible only through a service which should be innovative, disruptive and with high and immediate value to the retail users. Waiting 1 year to get an alpha version is not acceptable.
Ideally you should be able to get a feeling of the service during the ICO itself and be able to spend your tokens immediately after the end.
Rule # 4 - Make sure there is a reasonable Hardcap, any unsold tokens - destroyed and that there won't be any future offerings
With current abundance of ICOs it is becoming much more often that projects don't meet their hardcap. This is generally not a negative signal as long as the raised amount is over $2M, as like already mentioned, a group of smart people will perform better in the long term with $2M than a bunch of idiots with $232M.
This is why it is extremely important the token holder to destroy all unsold tokens immediately upon finalization of the tokensale. This will ensure that the supplied amount of tokens will be corresponding to the demand of the market and that its economy will be in balance.
Also making sure there won't be future offerings on the same token. This gives you protection against oversupply and this way the price can potentially go up as high as 500% - 1000% increase within a year.
Copied by fb post....
Thank you for sharing that! That's are indeed the most important things in the ICO selection process. I just want to add that if someone does not want to give you detailed information, then there is a signal to not invest! |
|
|
|
|
Gladyshaa
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 02, 2017, 11:00:34 AM |
|
Base on my research this Utrust is a blockchain-based platform that combines elements from traditional payment systems with the advantages provided by cryptocurrencies. The platform allows users to buy items, digital or physical, with their favourite cryptocurrency or token while providing a consumer-protection system in which coins are held in escrow until the transaction is fully complete. In case of a conflict, the resolution is handled by Utrust
|
|
|
|
|
Custard81
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
December 03, 2017, 02:38:48 PM |
|
December - I would say Experty.io... if the ICO starts when we think it will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marks1976
|
|
December 03, 2017, 03:05:14 PM |
|
Base on my research this Utrust is a blockchain-based platform that combines elements from traditional payment systems with the advantages provided by cryptocurrencies. The platform allows users to buy items, digital or physical, with their favourite cryptocurrency or token while providing a consumer-protection system in which coins are held in escrow until the transaction is fully complete. In case of a conflict, the resolution is handled by Utrust
Utrust already sold out in the crowdsale and it may become the best ico in november. you may no need to mention the previous project that alreayd raised a lot of the funding on the ico. Utrust similar with monetha and another just like openmoney. |
|
|
|
|
