AZIZ1977
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:19:35 PM |
|
network is still at 2gh and im still mining it
What? Network hashrate is at 1.4 GH/s. yes its dropping again very fast. you clearly missed the point of 1.7 so it went up. it went from 2 to 1 to 2 and now again to 1.4 in record time.
|
|
|
|
pizza
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:21:29 PM |
|
network is still at 2gh and im still mining it
What? Network hashrate is at 1.4 GH/s. yes its dropping again very fast. you clearly missed the point of 1.7 so it went up. it went from 2 to 1 to 2 and now again to 1.4 in record time. yep much higher than your shit GLD
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:22:37 PM |
|
network is still at 2gh and im still mining it
What? Network hashrate is at 1.4 GH/s. yes its dropping again very fast. you clearly missed the point of 1.7 so it went up. it went from 2 to 1 to 2 and now again to 1.4 in record time. Those changes in Hashrate, are the same people who believed PWC was 1500% profitable edit - Just noticed, RYC is reporting 180%...I know where they are going
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:23:29 PM |
|
network is still at 2gh and im still mining it
What? Network hashrate is at 1.4 GH/s. yes its dropping again very fast. you clearly missed the point of 1.7 so it went up. it went from 2 to 1 to 2 and now again to 1.4 in record time. yep much higher than your shit GLD Why cant you behave one time normal pizza? We all just want to know what is happening.
|
|
|
|
Kinetic915
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:25:18 PM |
|
You must be pretty thick. If you don't call 15sec block target new.
Perhaps your just a troll?
Changing a few variables doesn't make anything new. Namecoin was new. Devcoin was new. Tenebrix introduced scrypt. PPCoin introduced proof of stake. Those are something new. +1
|
|
|
|
Taxidermista
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:28:50 PM |
|
network is still at 2gh and im still mining it
What? Network hashrate is at 1.4 GH/s. 1.7GH why dont you wait 5 minutes and post a different number again, when i posted it was near 2gh. I'm in Erundook EU and didn't see those violent changes. Still seeing 1.4 GH/s.
|
|
|
|
barwizi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:29:12 PM |
|
Its a shit coin with nothing new, It'll die just like feathercoin did.
I'll just continue merged mining btc and making 108%+.
You must be pretty thick. If you don't call 15sec block target new. Perhaps your just a troll? GeistGeld. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=42417.015 second block time. September 2011. ++ + 1 billion for your cool calm response!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:31:26 PM |
|
23:06:58  getmininginfo
23:06:58  { "blocks" : 52816, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 6.41532247, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 1078770644, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
23:29:18  getmininginfo
23:29:18  { "blocks" : 54242, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 6.41532247, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 1934717394, "pooledtx" : 3, "testnet" : false }
23:43:54  getmininginfo
23:43:54  { "blocks" : 54303, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 6.41532247, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 2026000016, "pooledtx" : 2, "testnet" : false }
00:30:46  getmininginfo
00:30:46  { "blocks" : 54476, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 5.48483013, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 1404999961, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:32:52 PM |
|
Its a shit coin with nothing new, It'll die just like feathercoin did.
I'll just continue merged mining btc and making 108%+.
You must be pretty thick. If you don't call 15sec block target new. Perhaps your just a troll? GeistGeld. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=42417.015 second block time. September 2011. Experimental currency, read your own link perhaps? I have already covered this claim in other threads.
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:38:20 PM |
|
Devcoin may not have as many major changes, but neither did tenebrix or litecoin. Devcoin did have additions though, additions that were required for the voting and the bounties such. At least, to my understanding. Unthinkingbit or Markm would know more. Yes, YAC had some changes as well, I guess that is worth mentioning.
|
|
|
|
BitJohn
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:43:59 PM |
|
Soooo since when is old or original better? Ever owned a knock off? We had walkmans then iPods then Im sure some of the folks in the thread owned a zune! My point is money is being made its all all coins are a currency. Some people call lira shit money some people like euros all I care about is what it buys me and WDC bout me a couple grand soooo its good. When WDC doesnt make money people wont like it with that being said world coins difficulty being time based seems to adjust nicely to the hashrate dropping keeping the price nice and steady. So which of the elder coins have fast time based difficulty adjustment? hence the death of the feather and CNC. Was mincoin the first of the quick diff adjustment?
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:44:16 PM |
|
Experimental currency, read your own link perhaps? I have already covered this claim in other threads. I know what GeistGeld is, I'm aware that it was labeled an experiment. A few words doesn't change the fact that it was still done before. That isn't my point though, my point is that a coin with nothing new has extremely little chance of survival.
|
|
|
|
BitJohn
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:45:13 PM |
|
Experimental currency, read your own link perhaps? I have already covered this claim in other threads. I know what GeistGeld is, I'm aware that it was labeled an experiment. A few words doesn't change the fact that it was still done before. That isn't my point though, my point is that a coin with nothing new has extremely little chance of survival. I'm in it for the money not the glory
|
|
|
|
Praxis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:46:43 PM |
|
Experimental currency, read your own link perhaps? I have already covered this claim in other threads. I know what GeistGeld is, I'm aware that it was labeled an experiment. A few words doesn't change the fact that it was still done before. That isn't my point though, my point is that a coin with nothing new has extremely little chance of survival. I wouldn't say extremely low. Litecoin didn't innovate, but look where it is now.
|
|
|
|
fenican
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:47:40 PM |
|
Don't put too much faith in a market quotation. WDC may trade at .0005 today, .002 tomorrow, etc... Doesn't mean the coin is dead.
|
|
|
|
fenican
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:48:49 PM |
|
Yes, YAC had some changes as well, I guess that is worth mentioning.
Let me kill WDC a bit more. Bitcoin and all cryptocoins that originated from it but kept hash function (NMC, DVC, PPC, IXC, TRC, FRC) are using SHA-256 hash function which belongs to SHA-2 familly and all those cryptocoins can be mined with currently available ASIC chips. SHA-3 used in YAC is different familly, it can't be mined with the same ASIC chips used to mine SHA-256 coins. You lost me. What does this have to do with WDC, a scrypt coin ?
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:48:53 PM |
|
I wouldn't say extremely low. Litecoin didn't innovate, but look where it is now.
Err maybe your right, Litecoin is still kicking. I'm just going by the fact that lots of the recent altcoins are limping. A few months ago one would have survived possibly, but now nobody can take them seriously.
|
|
|
|
BitJohn
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:50:54 PM |
|
I wouldn't say extremely low. Litecoin didn't innovate, but look where it is now.
Err maybe your right, Litecoin is still kicking. I'm just going by the fact that lots of the recent altcoins are limping. A few months ago one would have survived possibly, but now nobody can take them seriously. I use the Bitcoin I make from WDC to shop at the Bitcoin megastore I'm just saying
|
|
|
|
anderl
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:51:09 PM |
|
Yes, YAC had some changes as well, I guess that is worth mentioning.
Let me kill WDC a bit more. Bitcoin and all cryptocoins that originated from it but kept hash function (NMC, DVC, PPC, IXC, TRC, FRC) are using SHA-256 hash function which belongs to SHA-2 familly and all those cryptocoins can be mined with currently available ASIC chips. SHA-3 used in YAC is different familly, it can't be mined with the same ASIC chips used to mine SHA-256 coins. You lost me. What does this have to do with WDC, a scrypt coin ? Scrypt still uses SHA256
|
|
|
|
crypt0maniac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 10:54:57 PM |
|
another dumped coinm but it was a good ride
|
|
|
|
|