problem with transaction

[coinerd]

ok, so what's up with this, any ideas?



I've done -rescan no change.

I didn't put the exchange name in the title as it may not be their fault but, what's happening?

This is *ALL* My BTC so I'm somewhere between panicked and REALLY pissed off.

EDIT it';s now 16:08 local, this has been almost two hours and 0 conf.

[1714639960]

1714639960

[1714639960]

1714639960

[1714639960]

1714639960

[1714639960]

1714639960

[1714639960]

1714639960

[grue]

didn't pay fee? expect long confirmation times.

[coinerd]

didn't pay fee? expect long confirmation times.

First of all, a fee was paid.

Second of all, it's not just this transaction.

https://blockchain.info/ip-address/67.176.55.157


No transaction out of that cryptsy IP has been processed in the last hours.

Considering that the transaction has obviously propagated across the network some hours ago why is it not getting confirms?

[coinerd]

ok

https://blockchain.info/ip-address/67.176.55.157

Transactions with fees of .0005 are processing, including ones after mine. Transactions with .0001 and less are not processing.

EDIT: Edited this post to remove a bit of pissy ranting and correct the numbers above. 

[bigvern]

Whose IP is that you are querying?

BigVern

[coinerd]

Whose IP is that you are querying?

BigVern

That IP was given up to me by searching block explorer for the transaction ID. According to the block explorer page that's the "IP that first relayed the transaction".

Logic would suggest that's the cryptsy bitcoind, but of course I have no idea for sure.  Sorry if I misnamed it "a cryptsy IP" but if it's not one you own it's perhaps an external IP for your network/datacenter?

I'm not THAT much of a cybersleuth

[bigvern]

Thats not cryptsy's ip.  Probably just the peer it went through.

BigVern

[coinerd]

The funds cleared, probably (as stated here) a network problem not a cryptsy problem.

There's another transaction (output) from that same address and I went into it to see that the "first reported by" IP or whatever was different from this one.  

A misunderstanding on my part, about the block explorer data. I wonder what it is, or why bother tracking it if it's isn't the origination node.