Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 10:17:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Rank Formula- Should it Change?  (Read 869 times)
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2017, 08:40:24 AM
 #21

Im not really against how theymos is running his forum..
I am almost completely against it. It's flawed from several perspectives.

If a user clearly haven't contributed anything—literally anything—in this forum, why would someone grants his/her demands re: forum rules?
Demands? I was not talking about granting any demands.

Also about Rizzarolla's list, only a few members of this forum really cared about that and it seems like the admins don't have much time to take a look about it due to Epochtalk.
The number of hours that admins spend on Epochtalk per week is near 0. Aside from theymos directing the development every now and then, Cyrus has zero hours to contribute to that project. Even if they were busy, that would just be another bullshit excuse.

A lot of folks seem psyched about DeepOnion. Is there a discussion you can link where people discuss it being a likely scam coin?
A lot of shill accounts and greedy fools. There is enough to be found in the relevant reference links and by using a search engine.

QS is a delusional pest and a scammer. Ignore it. Smiley

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
1713997074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713997074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713997074
Reply with quote  #2

1713997074
Report to moderator
1713997074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713997074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713997074
Reply with quote  #2

1713997074
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713997074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713997074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713997074
Reply with quote  #2

1713997074
Report to moderator
1713997074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713997074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713997074
Reply with quote  #2

1713997074
Report to moderator
1713997074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713997074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713997074
Reply with quote  #2

1713997074
Report to moderator
RedX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 06, 2017, 08:15:31 AM
 #22

nobody can not change it unless the owner or the administrator,
it's created this way to prevent a signature spammer and spammer,
in other word if they allow you to increase your rank by doing posts i believe we will see a thousand shit posts created in the future.
even right now you can see something like that,
for example i saw an account that have a post history for a single word.
like this 'shasing' and else.

so,please be understand about the rules and terms.
and also you just need a little bit more time and spend a little bit of your effort into it and your account rank increase.
just accept it and don't complain,you should be grateful that they allow you to join their forum


I completely agree. You should exert effort into something if you want to achieve something. The moderators here are very active to entertain any concerns that any member has so everything in here are perfect to me.
rjbtc2017
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 252


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 03:35:53 AM
 #23

Being a longtime member doesn't mean you should be given activity points, since activity requires posting. You have options to post non-crappy but why you didn't?.

I also suggest that signature campaign manager should not accept non-english speakers, with this i think spammers and crap posters will be minimized.

Most of the problem campaigns have managers that don't do anything about the quality of users they accept and that's the issue here. Until badly run campaigns are severely punished then nothing is going to change.
They have SMAS list right? and I think it should be mandatory to make each Campaign Managers to use each of their SMAS list to prevent shitposters and alt accounts to continually minimize them. But every now and then i'll just see new Campaign Managers for Altcoins and for BTC , which i think should be supporting the SMAS list.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!