Bitcoin Forum
August 17, 2018, 09:56:14 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 2013-05-21 Bitcoin Magazine: BitInstant, Licensed Money Transmitter in 30 States  (Read 1807 times)
razibuzouzou
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354
Merit: 250


coinorama.net


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2013, 11:12:02 AM
 #1

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/bitinstant-we-have-money-transmitter-licenses-in-30-states

I guess that's a good news Smiley
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1430
Merit: 1010


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:40:23 AM
 #2

Fascinating piece. It's surprisingly upbeat, even while revealing details about the massive amount of red tape it requires to be "licensed" in the US.

"You can spend only a medium amount of money (in business terms; for a basement startup, it is still very much prohibitive) and get the licenses in several years, or you can spend more to get them faster. Tradehill currently has two lawyers per engineer hired to work on compliance issues."

salfter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 646
Merit: 500


My PGP Key: 92C7689C


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2013, 11:01:38 PM
 #3

From the article:

Quote
Bitcoin exchanges will now likely be required to have money transmitter licenses in all 48 states to operate across the country

Umm...is it 2013, or is it still 1957 wherever this was written?

Tipjars: BTC 1TipsGocnz2N5qgAm9f7JLrsMqkb3oXe2 LTC LTipsVC7XaFy9M6Zaf1aGGe8w8xVUeWFvR | My Bitcoin Note Generator | Pool Auto-Switchers: zpool MiningPoolHub NiceHash
Bitgem Resources: Pool Explorer Paper Wallet
prophetx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000


he who has the gold makes the rules


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 12:31:00 AM
 #4

From the article:

Quote
Bitcoin exchanges will now likely be required to have money transmitter licenses in all 48 states to operate across the country

Umm...is it 2013, or is it still 1957 wherever this was written?


It is because the federal govt only has control over interstate commerce not intrastate commerce, it is buried somewhere in constitution Wink

Commerce clause and 10th amendment

WINGS Beta is live - list your ICO for only 5000 WINGS at https://wings.ai - over $650 Million raised by ICOs with WINGS
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:38:42 AM
 #5

Fascinating piece. It's surprisingly upbeat, even while revealing details about the massive amount of red tape it requires to be "licensed" in the US.

"You can spend only a medium amount of money (in business terms; for a basement startup, it is still very much prohibitive) and get the licenses in several years, or you can spend more to get them faster. Tradehill currently has two lawyers per engineer hired to work on compliance issues."



of course its positive.  its written by Vitalik Buterin of Bitcoin Magazine which is not surprisingly pro Bitcoin.
solex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:59:36 AM
 #6

Fascinating piece. It's surprisingly upbeat, even while revealing details about the massive amount of red tape it requires to be "licensed" in the US.

"You can spend only a medium amount of money (in business terms; for a basement startup, it is still very much prohibitive) and get the licenses in several years, or you can spend more to get them faster. Tradehill currently has two lawyers per engineer hired to work on compliance issues."



Government has been relentlessly growing in size every decade.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/GovernmentGrowth.html#lfHendersonCEE2-075_table_024

This bigger it gets the more petty bureaucrats need to feather their nests.This licencing is a glimpse into how desperate the situation has become.

smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1003


LEALANA Monero Physical Silver Coins


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 05:17:12 AM
 #7

So what does this imply that bitstant could not do before?

I mean they used third party intermediaries to get funds from your location to the exchange of your choosing.


███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.        SMOOTHIE'S HEALTH AND FITNESS JOURNAL          History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA  PHYSICAL MONERO COINS 999 FINE SILVER.
 
salfter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 646
Merit: 500


My PGP Key: 92C7689C


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 07:32:42 AM
 #8

From the article:

Quote
Bitcoin exchanges will now likely be required to have money transmitter licenses in all 48 states to operate across the country

Umm...is it 2013, or is it still 1957 wherever this was written?


It is because the federal govt only has control over interstate commerce not intrastate commerce, it is buried somewhere in constitution

Last time I checked, there were 50 states, not 48. 1957 was the last year we had 48 states; Alaska and Hawaii were admitted in 1958.

Tipjars: BTC 1TipsGocnz2N5qgAm9f7JLrsMqkb3oXe2 LTC LTipsVC7XaFy9M6Zaf1aGGe8w8xVUeWFvR | My Bitcoin Note Generator | Pool Auto-Switchers: zpool MiningPoolHub NiceHash
Bitgem Resources: Pool Explorer Paper Wallet
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1002


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 11:20:06 AM
 #9

From the article:

Quote
Bitcoin exchanges will now likely be required to have money transmitter licenses in all 48 states to operate across the country

Umm...is it 2013, or is it still 1957 wherever this was written?


It is because the federal govt only has control over interstate commerce not intrastate commerce, it is buried somewhere in constitution

Last time I checked, there were 50 states, not 48. 1957 was the last year we had 48 states; Alaska and Hawaii were admitted in 1958.

It's like you didn't even read qhat you quoted...

Would you like a lawyer to go research this response?  Would providing the constitutional reference or perhaps regulatory guidance?

I agree it's a little fuzzy, and I don't know the answer, but perhaps the interstate vs intrstate is where you're not following?

Why does interstate imply juxtaposition on a map?  Is that a legal definition thing?

Coinbase for selling BTCs or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
PM me with any questions on these sites!  Happy to help!
aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1430
Merit: 1010


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:31:30 AM
 #10

Fascinating piece. It's surprisingly upbeat, even while revealing details about the massive amount of red tape it requires to be "licensed" in the US.

"You can spend only a medium amount of money (in business terms; for a basement startup, it is still very much prohibitive) and get the licenses in several years, or you can spend more to get them faster. Tradehill currently has two lawyers per engineer hired to work on compliance issues."



of course its positive.  its written by Vitalik Buterin of Bitcoin Magazine which is not surprisingly pro Bitcoin.

I know - the surprise (for me) was that he managed to show no overt bitterness about the situation. Most people would be furious at the red tape and many would give up, which I suppose is the point of red tape as industry gatekeeper.
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1002


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 11:44:04 AM
 #11

Well this is excellent information.

I'll have to look up the Ohio minimum, but seems like for less than the cost of one bitcoin ATM ($5k), I might be able to get licensed & start selling bitcoins!

Very exciting!

Heck, I may be happy to do that just so I can "legally" sell bitcoins.  However, I may worry more about that a few months down the road.  Let FIN CEN and the futures commodity commisioner hash out some more guidance.

Coinbase for selling BTCs or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
PM me with any questions on these sites!  Happy to help!
TangibleCryptography
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


Tangible Cryptography LLC


View Profile WWW
May 25, 2013, 06:56:20 PM
 #12

Last time I checked, there were 50 states, not 48. 1957 was the last year we had 48 states; Alaska and Hawaii were admitted in 1958.

Not all states require a license for money transmitters although I figure it is only a matter of time.  It gets more complicated in that some US "territories" like Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and whatever the hell Washing DC is also license money transmitters.  Of course the laws aren't uniform.  Some only require a license for entities operating in the jurisdiction.  Some require licenses for entities who offer services to citizens of their jurisdiction.  Even the definition of what is a money transmitter varies from location to location.
TangibleCryptography
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


Tangible Cryptography LLC


View Profile WWW
May 25, 2013, 07:02:33 PM
 #13

I'll have to look up the Ohio minimum, but seems like for less than the cost of one bitcoin ATM ($5k), I might be able to get licensed & start selling bitcoins!

The cost of the license is usually trivial however most states require a surety bond and certain capitalization requirements.  Those are pretty tough.  You may wonder why the state wants the company to have large amounts of funds AND a surety bond in case something goes wrong.  The reason (or at least stated reason) is that States don't regulate MT for AML or KYC reasons they regulate them in the name of consumer protection.  Take your billpay provider as an example.  Say you use your billpay provider to pay your mortgage.  Well the reality is you don't pay your mortgage.  You give money to the billpay provider in return for the promise to pay your mortgage company.  Now imagine they don't and just disappear with the money.   Oops your mortgage is now delinquent.   Now worst case scenario you can't afford to make a second payment so your home goes into foreclosure.  Now that is extreme but traditionally MT have been an entity which acts as a middle man between TWO PARTIES (i.e. Sally uses WU to pay John).  FinCEN guidance tries to cram exchanging virtual currency into MT but the states are more concerned about ensuring that if a MT fails that there are funds to compensate victims who's payments "disappear".

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!